Coronavirus Pandemic

'We're not going to be knocking on people doors on Christmas Day': Police officers say new Tier 4 restrictions 'don't make sense' as thousands vow to IGNORE the rules
I doubt they would get away with it either. I think the police know that if they tried to enforce it, with them being recorded at the same time and going viral, then they risk an enraged populace, riots and injury to their officers.


You think so? I hope you are right that the average Brit has had enough. But I don't know. Everywhere in the world, there is not enough pushback, admittedly I don't know what people are supposed to do. I mean you pushback, you can get arrested and nothing changes, you can't open up your restaurant if you own one, if other restauranteers don't do it with you. One nation has to rise up and put an end to this, that could inspire others around the world to do likewise. Yes the authorities are getting more desperate, their methods more draconian, thing is they have support of Big Tech and most people are lulled by that, facebook is the new crack cocaine. Anti-lockdown protests are necessary and must continue and yet clearly they are not enough. Governments don't care so long as their toast is still buttered.

Important to stress that in order to push the vaccines on a desperate population, desperate for work and for social contact, governments and Big Pharma (which nowadays is the same thing) will continue to push the alarm bells of a pandemic that is going to kill your children any day now (although it's been a year and counting... Remind you of AGW aka climate change? It's been thirty years now since I remember being told we would all be forced to live in floating arks because the ice caps were going to melt any day now), will continue to stress the needs for lockdowns. That way people will see the vaccines as the salvation, and just decide to get their vaccine shot, whereas without the hysteria being fanned by media and the medical establishment and their puppet governments, and the lockdowns and threats of more lockdowns, they would otherwise hesitate and turn down the vaccine. So as the vaccine role-outs pick up pace, expect more lying media hysteria and med establishment lying hysteria and our buffoon governments losing their minds, doing as they are told by our new real world government bosses - Big Pharma. It's not a meaningless coincidence that as the mass vaccine role-out and related propaganda gets going, we are being warned that if you meet your loved ones for Thanksgiving (Birx the lying twit who gave the thumbs up to the mass poisoning of Third Worlders with toxic AIDS drugs, just like Fauci) and now Christmas, you - even if you are young and healthy - are going to kill grandma, the family cat and Santa's reindeers and even dear Santa himself, who being perpetually elderly, is of course at risk. I am sure - albeit I haven't checked - you can find some gif somewhere of Santa getting his Pfizer vaccine, with a cheery smile.
 
You think so? I hope you are right that the average Brit has had enough. But I don't know. Everywhere in the world, there is not enough pushback, admittedly I don't know what people are supposed to do. I mean you pushback, you can get arrested and nothing changes, you can't open up your restaurant if you own one, if other restauranteers don't do it with you. One nation has to rise up and put an end to this, that could inspire others around the world to do likewise. Yes the authorities are getting more desperate, their methods more draconian, thing is they have support of Big Tech and most people are lulled by that, facebook is the new crack cocaine. Anti-lockdown protests are necessary and must continue and yet clearly they are not enough. Governments don't care so long as their toast is still buttered.

Important to stress that in order to push the vaccines on a desperate population, desperate for work and for social contact, governments and Big Pharma (which nowadays is the same thing) will continue to push the alarm bells of a pandemic that is going to kill your children any day now (although it's been a year and counting... Remind you of AGW aka climate change? It's been thirty years now since I remember being told we would all be forced to live in floating arks because the ice caps were going to melt any day now), will continue to stress the needs for lockdowns. That way people will see the vaccines as the salvation, and just decide to get their vaccine shot, whereas without the hysteria being fanned by media and the medical establishment and their puppet governments, and the lockdowns and threats of more lockdowns, they would otherwise hesitate and turn down the vaccine. So as the vaccine role-outs pick up pace, expect more lying media hysteria and med establishment lying hysteria and our buffoon governments losing their minds, doing as they are told by our new real world government bosses - Big Pharma. It's not a meaningless coincidence that as the mass vaccine role-out and related propaganda gets going, we are being warned that if you meet your loved ones for Thanksgiving (Birx the lying twit who gave the thumbs up to the mass poisoning of Third Worlders with toxic AIDS drugs, just like Fauci) and now Christmas, you - even if you are young and healthy - are going to kill grandma, the family cat and Santa's reindeers and even dear Santa himself, who being perpetually elderly, is of course at risk. I am sure - albeit I haven't checked - you can find some gif somewhere of Santa getting his Pfizer vaccine, with a cheery smile.

I think the Police are walking on a tightrope because they know if they push it too far, there will be significant resistance. They don't want repeats of London 2011, all over the country. But the weather is cold right now and it seems as though the public are so demoralised that they don't care about anything anymore. Add to that, there seems to be a loud percentage of people who are actually fully and completely supportive of even stricter lockdowns. These types of people are lost, and are also a danger to the rest of society. You constantly see them parrot whatever those in power say, which tends to be "it's only this christmas, two weeks, one month, just a mask etc". They are totally unaware of how retarded they sound to everyone else who has been watching closely, the mouths of the politicians. If you have ever read about the NPC meme, then honestly, and also according to some spiritual traditions, it fits the description. Terrifying.

So there are quite a few factors in play here. I have hopes, but I also think the British public have been totally pacified and rendered docile overall, over the past 20 years. You echo the same thoughts and general concern that I have for the way that this is going. I have ditched FB, IG and moved to other standalone platforms online, much like what we had in the early days of the internet. Feels better. Social media seems to be a cancer on society more than a net benefit indeed.
 
The irony about Big Tech is that when the geniuses at Silicon Valley in the 1960s and early 70s helped to invent what we have now, the guys at SRI (where remote viewing was also pioneered), the Xerox lab, and at Stanford's AI lab, dropping acid, protesting against Vietnam, there was a sense that what they were doing was not only revolutionary, they knew that; but that they were mavericks bucking the system (of course it was all funded by the Pentagon! but that's just one of the ironies here), they were going to change the way we lived and worked, by opening up information channels in ways that were hitherto not even imagined. And of course they did that. However as is often the case (the rebel when he gains power becomes like the tyrant he overthrew), as Big Tech just got bigger and bigger, publicly traded companies that are now among the wealthiest in the world, they were always going to go the way of upholding the status quo and the zeitgeist of the elite (whatever that zeitgeist or mentality happened to be). That's what happens when you become a big behemoth, your allegiance is to shareholders and worse, the outlook of a sadomasochistic suicidal society and a smug, self-satisfied elite that is increasingly zombified, stupefied.

Back in the seventies and eighties it was IBM that was seen as the symbol of corporate Big Tech power (even the most powerful corporation in the world at one time); however today we see it is all the new kids on the block who have morphed into zombies out of some B grade horror. Google, youtube, facebook, Wiki, Twitter, the blogging platforms etc. IBM never had anything on them, they were and are a sober company making business machines, and whoever bought them and made use of their expertise, and could afford it all, did so. If that included some dubious corporate enterprises and nefarious government agencies and related, well so it was. But IBM were not acting as the guardians of the Thought Police, and not helping to cover up the crimes of one of the biggest and most powerful transnational mafia organizations in the world, Big Pharma and Establishment Medicine. And that is aside from the New Big Tech's in-your-face collaboration with our governments and our Idiot Media Networks in other odious ways. Orwell's Ministry of Truth ain't got nothing on these upstarts who whilst they may be billionaires, have no real mindfulness to speak of. They don't even feel any shame at their outrageous censorship and news shaping, which is getting worse and worse every year, it seems every week now. They feel they have the truth on their side, so everything they do rings of self-justification, true believers, like all the mad and misguided. We all know how people are having their blogs deplatformed etc. And I am not talking neo-Nazis here.

We would not be in this COVID-1984 mess without social media and the smart phone. They are the new ingredients (there are plenty others too of course) that helped to accelerate and make inevitable the biggest outbreak of mass hysteria in history. And their (social media and MSM) censorship and shaping of the 'news' ensures that it continues to snowball... And that is what we have here, a snowballing avalanche. We are in the midst of a landslide that has nothing to do with da virus and by implication Mother Nature playing at some cruel mysterious game, but everything to do with a humanity that is unhinged and hysterical, idiotic and insane. And none of us know how it is going to play out.
 
Everywhere in the world, there is not enough pushback, admittedly I don't know what people are supposed to do. I mean you pushback, you can get arrested and nothing changes, you can't open up your restaurant if you own one, if other restauranteers don't do it with you.
In basically 'civilised' places like Britain, I would say you can go to the demos, so long as you don't really oppose a direct order to disperse. Judging from my first demo, they let the demo go so far before they do anything. If plenty of people turn up, it makes a real headache for the police, and the signal may go back up the chain that enough is enough. If I suddenly stop posting here, you will know I was wrong!

David
 
Our U.S. "Covid Relief" package is so rotten it's funny.

* $1.9 Trillion in tax cuts for the Rich: "Good for the economy"

* $750 billion a year for the military: "for people's safety"

* $3 Trillion to prop up the stock market: "Can't let companies go bankrupt"

* $5,000 per year to every citizen of Israel.

* People struggling through a brutal economy and government-imposed bankruptcy, soon to be evicted into the winter snow: "Here's $600 chump. Enjoy."

 
Here is how much American Politicians care about Americans...

mJwyUVi.png
 
Gunna make this brief even though there is lots to tell.

Lots of controversy over Tiffany Dover, the young nurse who fainted after being vaccinated. Is she alive?

Rumor's of her death quickly flooded social media the day after she collapsed that she had died as a result of the vaccine. That was the i9th.

Then the media fact checkers and such began to dispute the rumors. The hospital where she worked posted a video showing her alive and well on the 21st.

Is this really Tiffany? The bottom image definitely is.

iu

iu


Here is the freaky part. Apparently her death was on file and was able to be seen at this database.

https://www.searchquarry.com/

So I tried looking, Name : Tiffany Dover, from Higdon Alabama. And all I get is this message.
Whoops! Our Searches Occasionally Time Out, Here are Some Reasons Why:

Except I have tried dozens of other names and found files for all of them. The only name that produces this message is Tiffany Dover. WTF!!?

All her social media accounts have been terminated.

I really hope this beautiful young lady, mother of two is actually OK. The media is trying to say that she is. But consider if she has actually died! What would happen then? They have only just rolled it out, what do you think they would do? A cover up?

Lots of people want to know, you would think they would put peoples mind at ease and do a interview with her, instead we get this weird video and high strangeness.

Could be nothing.

Could be something else.
 
I seen that LS.

I thought I found her 'new' Youtube account. The comments had been blocked and it didn't seem like someones personal profile because it had a "How do you do, fellow kids" vibe to it.

Now I've just checked and it's gone. So I have no idea anymore!

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZM3SWozuGCOHH6o9-8jyuQ

Yeah this is quite strange. That video looks like a girl who looks similar for sure. I searched for images of her and found several. She is quite petite, that girl looks slightly heavier, never found any with her hair parted down the middle looking like that. The lighting is bad so it is difficult to really make a call.

But dam, that database consistently gives that error, I have been trying for a few hours using friends and family names in different combination and found hits for all except her name. Not a no file message but always the time out.

Pfizer needs to get her to give an interview. This is highly suspect but I really hope this is just rumor.

Instagram is still up.
https://www.instagram.com/tiffany_dover_/
 
Last edited:
I was reading around and it was said that on social media, the friends and family of her had all set their profiles to private.

Whether this was because of a massive information mob coming after you to get the story and some privacy wanted, or an actual coverup, I don't know.


But surely to put to bed the rumours, it might be best to give an official statement? Otherwise it will look very much like something has happened to her until she does.
 
I was reading around and it was said that on social media, the friends and family of her had all set their profiles to private.

Whether this was because of a massive information mob coming after you to get the story and some privacy wanted, or an actual coverup, I don't know.


But surely to put to bed the rumours, it might be best to give an official statement? Otherwise it will look very much like something has happened to her until she does.

Yes it has got a lot of attention, so keeping away from the mob would make sense.

I agree, the longer it takes the more it will undermine confidence, that doesn't sound like good marketing to me.
 
The nurse is white skinned with dark hair. Nobody in that image looks remotely like that, and I don't suppose she spent time dying her hair just after that incident!

If it is a cover-up it is extraordinarily clumsy - maybe her colleagues are being pushed into faking doing that picture and basically want people to recognise it as a fake. Besides, they surely would not go ahead with a publicity stunt while their colleague was ill?

David
 
Tiffany Dover, the young nurse who fainted after being vaccinated. Is she alive?

Death records are serious legal documents that affect court cases, insurance settlements, real estate, etc.

They are almost impossible to both fake or conceal.

If this Nurse did die, it would be easy for a serious Conspiracy Researcher to verify.
 
Jeffery Tucker is a good enough writer I took him out to dinner at an expensive Italian restaurant back when I was a Libertarian. :)

This Soviet-style historical revision is incredible.

---------------------------

WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Its Website
Jeffrey A. Tucker, December 23, 2020

"Maybe you have some sense that something fishy is going on?

Coronavirus lived on surfaces until it didn’t. Masks didn’t work until they did, then they did not. There is asymptomatic transmission, except there isn’t. Lockdowns work to control the virus except they do not. All these people are sick without symptoms until, whoops, PCR tests are wildly inaccurate because they were never intended to be diagnostic tools. Everyone is in danger of the virus except they aren’t. It spreads in schools except it doesn’t.

On it goes. Daily. It’s no wonder that so many people have stopped believing anything that “public health authorities” say. In combination with governors and other autocrats doing their bidding, they set out to take away freedom and human rights and expected us to thank them for saving our lives. At some point this year (for me it was March 12) life began feeling like a dystopian novel of your choice.

Well, now I have another piece of evidence to add to the mile-high pile of fishy mess. The World Health Organization, for reasons unknown, has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology: herd immunity. Its discovery was one of the major achievements of 20th century science, gradually emerging in the 1920s and then becoming ever more refined throughout the 20th century.

Herd immunity is a fascinating observation that you can trace to biological reality or statistical probability theory, whichever you prefer. (It is certainly not a “strategy” so ignore any media source that describes it that way.) Herd immunity speaks directly, and with explanatory power, to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild (common cold) or very severe and short-lived (Ebola).

Why is this? The reason is that when a virus kills its host – that is, when a virus overtaxes the body’s ability to integrate it, its host dies and so the virus does not spread to others. The more this occurs, the less it spreads. If the virus doesn’t kill its host, it can hop to others through all the usual means. When you get a virus and fight it off, your immune system encodes that information in a way that builds immunity to it. When it happens to enough people (and each case is different so we can’t put a clear number on it, especially given so many cross immunities) the virus loses its pandemic quality and becomes endemic, which is to say predictable and manageable. Each new generation incorporates that information through more exposure.

This is what one would call Virology/Immunology 101. It’s what you read in every textbook. It’s been taught in 9th grade cell biology for probably 80 years. Observing the operations of this evolutionary phenomenon is pretty wonderful because it increases one’s respect for the way in which human biology has adapted to the presence of pathogens without absolutely freaking out.

And the discovery of this fascinating dynamic in cell biology is a major reason why public health became so smart in the 20th century. We kept calm. We managed viruses with medical professionals: doctor/patient relationships. We avoided the Medieval tendency to run around with hair on fire but rather used rationality and intelligence. Even the New York Times recognizes that natural immunity is powerful with Covid-19, which is not in the least bit surprising.

Until one day, this strange institution called the World Health Organization – once glorious because it was mainly responsible for the eradication of smallpox – has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics. It has literally changed the science in a Soviet-like way. It has removed with the delete key any mention of natural immunities from its website. It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines.

So that you will believe me, I will try to be as precise as possible. Here is the website from June 9, 2020. You can see it here on Archive.org. You have to move down the page and click on the question about herd immunity. You see the following.
Screen-Shot-2020-12-23-at-4.42.43-PM-800x269.png

That’s pretty darn accurate overall. Even the statement that the threshold is “not yet clear” is correct. There are cross immunities to Covid from other coronaviruses and there is T cell memory that contributes to natural immunity.

Some estimates are as low as 10%, which is a far cry from the modelled 70% estimate of virus immunity that is standard within the pharmaceutical realm. Real life is vastly more complicated than models, in economics or epidemiology. The WHO’s past statement is a solid, if “pop,” description.

However, in a screenshot dated November 13, 2020, we read the following note that somehow pretends as if human beings do not have immune systems at all but rather rely entirely on big pharma to inject things into our blood.
Screen-Shot-2020-12-23-at-5.20.39-PM-800x498.png

What this note at the World Health Organization has done is deleted what amounts to the entire million-year history of humankind in its delicate dance with pathogens. You could only gather from this that all of us are nothing but blank and unimprovable slates on which the pharmaceutical industry writes its signature.

In effect, this change at WHO ignores and even wipes out 100 years of medical advances in virology, immunology, and epidemiology. It is thoroughly unscientific – shilling for the vaccine industry in exactly the way the conspiracy theorists say that WHO has been doing since the beginning of this pandemic.

What’s even more strange is the claim that a vaccine protects people from a virus rather than exposing them to it. What’s amazing about this claim is that a vaccine works precisely by firing up the immune system through exposure. Why I had to type those words is truly beyond me. This has been known for centuries. There is simply no way for medical science completely to replace the human immune system. It can only game it via what used to be called inoculation.

Take from this what you will. It is a sign of the times. For nearly a full year, the media has been telling us that “science” requires that we comply with their dictates that run contrary to every tenet of liberalism, every expectation we’ve developed in the modern world that we can live freely and with the certainty of rights. Then “science” took over and our human rights were slammed. And now the “science” is actually deleting its own history, airbrushing over what it used to know and replacing it with something misleading at best and patently false at worst.

I cannot say why, exactly, the WHO did this. Given the events of the past nine or ten months, however, it is reasonable to assume that politics are at play. Since the beginning of the pandemic, those who have been pushing lockdowns and hysteria over the coronavirus have resisted the idea of natural herd immunity, instead insisting that we must live in lockdown until a vaccine is developed.

That is why the Great Barrington Declaration, written by three of the world’s preeminent epidemiologists and which advocated embracing the phenomenon of herd immunity as a way of protecting the vulnerable and minimizing harms to society, was met with such venom. Now we see the WHO, too, succumbing to political pressure. This is the only rational explanation for changing the definition of herd immunity that has existed for the past century.

The science has not changed; only the politics have. And that is precisely why it is so dangerous and deadly to subject virus management to the forces of politics. Eventually the science too bends to the duplicitous character of the political industry.

When the existing textbooks that students use in college contradict the latest official pronouncements from the authorities during a crisis in which the ruling class is clearly attempting to seize permanent power, we’ve got a problem.

From: https://www.aier.org/article/who-deletes-naturally-acquired-immunity-from-its-website/
 
Death records are serious legal documents that affect court cases, insurance settlements, real estate, etc.

They are almost impossible to both fake or conceal.

If this Nurse did die, it would be easy for a serious Conspiracy Researcher to verify.

I don't know about that. As far as I know no one has been able to confirm her death or whether she is still alive, or in hiding for some reason. The public record site I posted is not a reliable indicator of a death status. The fact she returns the time out message is curious. Like other names, multiple entries are the norm.
 
Last edited:
The nurse is white skinned with dark hair. Nobody in that image looks remotely like that, and I don't suppose she spent time dying her hair just after that incident!

If it is a cover-up it is extraordinarily clumsy - maybe her colleagues are being pushed into faking doing that picture and basically want people to recognise it as a fake. Besides, they surely would not go ahead with a publicity stunt while their colleague was ill?

David

Yeah, I have tried giving the benefit of doubt, but on further examination... That is not Tiffany IMO. Skin color, hair color, length and style. Facial bone structure, eye color, body type, height and weight. It also may not be 100% positive for the other woman to match but she is clearly "closer" in resemblance than Tiffany is (was) by many magnitudes.

Yet she is wearing the same necklace, the same watch, although much tighter fitting now! The ID tag looks the same too.

The video raises other questions. Why would you have a sign with that date on it when the vaccinations occurred a few days earlier if not to post date the speculation?

Why would one say "we support Tiffany" when she clearly was up and talking again after fainting and supposedly back at work in front of a camera a few days later? Despite the claim she wishes privacy. Would it not make perfectly logical sense that she could say at least a few words since she is on camera already? The Tiffany sign suggests that this was the reason for that small piece of footage, yet she is supposedly standing right there, why would they not simply ask her how she was feeling? So weird. This was damage control that went wrong big time I think.

Yeah some of the staff appear quite uncomfortable and awkward.

Clearly having the staff getting jabbed on camera for the masses is simply a PR exercise. Well this has turned out to be a PR nightmare! With this bizarre video just adding fuel to the fire and no attempts so far to rectify it. Which you'd think would be fairly simple. Add to that it also seems there is a gag on her family and friends across social media networks.

According to a ex-Pfizer research scientist, polyethylene glycol can stimulate antibodies in 70% of people against that substance. Causing allergic and potentially fatal reactions. So death is actually a side effect. I wonder if this is what has occurred.
 
Last edited:
The nurse is white skinned with dark hair. Nobody in that image looks remotely like that, and I don't suppose she spent time dying her hair just after that incident!

If it is a cover-up it is extraordinarily clumsy - maybe her colleagues are being pushed into faking doing that picture and basically want people to recognise it as a fake. Besides, they surely would not go ahead with a publicity stunt while their colleague was ill?

David

Death records are serious legal documents that affect court cases, insurance settlements, real estate, etc.

They are almost impossible to both fake or conceal.

If this Nurse did die, it would be easy for a serious Conspiracy Researcher to verify.

Yeah, I have tried giving the benefit of doubt, but on further examination... That is not Tiffany IMO. Skin color, hair color, length and style. Facial bone structure, eye color, body type, height and weight. It also may not be 100% positive for the other woman to match but she is clearly "closer" in resemblance than Tiffany is (was) by many magnitudes.

Yet she is wearing the same necklace, the same watch, although much tighter fitting now! The ID tag looks the same too.

The video raises other questions. Why would you have a sign with that date on it when the vaccinations occurred a few days earlier if not to post date the speculation?

Why would one say "we support Tiffany" when she clearly was up and talking again after fainting and supposedly back at work in front of a camera a few days later? Despite the claim she wishes privacy. Would it not make perfectly logical sense that she could say at least a few words since she is on camera already? The Tiffany sign suggests that this was the reason for that small piece of footage, yet she is supposedly standing right there, why would they not simply ask her how she was feeling? So weird. This was damage control that went wrong big time I think.

Yeah some of the staff appear quite uncomfortable and awkward.

Clearly having the staff getting jabbed on camera for the masses is simply a PR exercise. Well this has turned out to be a PR nightmare! With this bizarre video just adding fuel to the fire and no attempts so far to rectify it. Which you'd think would be fairly simple. Add to that it also seems there is a gag on her family and friends across social media networks.

According to a ex-Pfizer research scientist, polyethylene glycol can stimulate antibodies in 70% of people against that substance. Causing allergic and potentially fatal reactions. So death is actually a side effect. I wonder if this is what has occurred.

I think the actual truth is much larger than the fate of this one unlucky nurse, and it is truly horrifying: the world in which we live in is coming ever closer to something which truly resembles the (in)famous Orwell' 1984 dystopia.

From the beginning of human social life, the power elites have employes lies and hoaxes to deceive people and thus obtain and maintain their power. But it was important for them that the falsehoods and fabrications they used were at least somewhat believeable, were close enough to the actuality so that the people would confuse them with one. They were careful not to be exposed, so their deception-based power would not be shattered.

But from late 20th century onward, the situation began to change rapidly: the appeal to authority, once universally recognised as invalid argument, started to become increasingly whitewashed by the "mainstream", and then was exalted to the pedestal as the decisive aggument in any debate; while the rejection of it was branded as "conspiracy theory" as was stigmatised, marginalised and persecuted to an increasingly extreme extent. And, quite predictably, most people, out of fear to be ridiculed and dismissed and out of desire to be heard and accepted, have supported this act of intellectual sabotage.

So, now, a claim made by "authority" (read: by the mainstream) is no longer considered refutable, dubitable and controvertible; it is presented as being synonymous with, and identical to, "truth", "fact" and "reality". Any argument or objection raised against it, and, most importantly, any evidence or testimony contradicting it, is, by definition, either delusional, or fraudulent, or both at once - and any person or group presenting them are either bad, or mad, or both.

So, after this act of intellectual sabotage became successful, the power elites can feel some relief after all: from now on, there is no need for them to lie and fabricate in an at least somewhat believable manner. Instead of it, they can propagate any convoluted, baseless, in-your-face-fabricated nonsense and get out with it, since to point to the falsehood publicly is to brand yourself as malevolent and / or delusional "conspiracy theorist" in the eyes of "normal" society.

In this society, people are more than just not encouraged to observe attentively, think critically and decide wilfully; they are encouraged, in fact commanded, not to observe, think and decide by their own at all, but "trust the (mainstream) experts", "believe in (mainstream) science" and "follow the (mainstream) consensus" instead - with the power elite being the ones who decides who is "expert", what is "science" and how the "consensus" is reached and perpetuated. To observe, to think and to decide for yourself is interpreted as a sign of either vileness or insanity; the refusal to do so is what "normalcy" is.

In the end, what we will face is effectively this...

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984
 
Back
Top