David Eire
New
NDEs are a scientifically categorized phenomena that have repeatedly been experienced by individuals around the world. And all kinds of individuals, from very young children, to individuals who had never heard of an NDE. In the last few decades 65 different scientific studies have been conducted regarding NDEs, and nearly all of them have been published in peer review scientific journals, and have REPEATEDLY provided results confirming and corroborating previous studies.
Scientific objectivity is a form of repeatable observation, but this repeatable observation doesn't require each observer be in the same room observing the same phenomena. In addition, scientific observation does not depend on the assumption that any psychological experience reported must necessarily be false. In fact, all scientists report their observations, which are in of themselves psychological experience. A good portion of psychology and the social sciences and medical research ABSOLUTELY DEPEND on psychological surveys and testimony and analysis of what human beings report. To make the claim that this is not scientific is simply another fallacy by materialist skeptics who use this Skeptical talking point propaganda as if it held some kind of scientific validity or rigor.
If you think it is very useful to study NDEs then maybe you might actually do so, instead of make the ridiculous claim that NDE research does not conform to science. Look at the bloody evidence for once, or better yet, conduct a scientific study like so many others have done.
Finally, I'm not going to waste my time here arguing over evidentiary standards, based on the a priori bias of a materialist skeptic who immediately assumes based on ignorance that whatever evidence has been provided - be it Psi or NDEs it must be necessarily false due to poor scientific methodology. This argument, that is one step away from the accusation of "woo" is just another piece of empty rhetoric Skeptics resort to, while absolutely refusing to grant even a modicum of respect and consideration for the hard work of real scientists (not pseudo-scientists) engaged in the scientific research of Psi and NDE phenomena.
My Best,
Bertha
I did not claim that NDE research does not conform to science.
Only that it presents serious difficulties and inherent obstacles.
You persist in completely misunderstanding my points and arguing against things I dont believe or say
so I wish you well etc; but lets leave it there