Debate on British morning TV between Psychic and Magician

There is useful information coming from a reading and often it is healing. But it does not proof to me that there are any angels or dead relatives out there talking to me. It could just be as plausible that I continuously broadcast the unresolved issues in my subconscious and that this is what is being read back to me.

True, but drop in communications and the like do - if the reports are accurate - suggest dead people living on as spirits is more likely than psychic power explanations.

There are also the studies where they use proxy sitters and such.

All that said sometimes I suspect it's meant to be a mystery. There's intuitively something to the Forster saying, "Death destroys a man but the idea of it saves him."

Though at the same time the reasons for such a veil are never quite clear to me...
 
True, but drop in communications and the like do - if the reports are accurate - suggest dead people living on as spirits is more likely than psychic power explanations.

The problem I have here that this leads to the validation of reincarnation. That is the concept I really struggle with. Not that there isn’t a part of me that is eternal and keeps on living. But I see this eternal part more like a drop of water or a snowflake. It is on a journey from the clouds to the earth and has certain experiences, changing its properties. Once the snowflake is melted and back on its way to the ocean or lake, those properties become part of the body of water and the droplet itself no longer exists.

That does not mean however, that both theories could not coexist simultaneously in some form.

There are also the studies where they use proxy sitters and such.

I think all this means is that the medium does not have access to any sensory information, and is more likely to do a form of remote viewing. It does not prove that they communicate with the dead vs. the subconscious content of the person who is being read for.


All that said sometimes I suspect it's meant to be a mystery. There's intuitively something to the Forster saying, "Death destroys a man but the idea of it saves him."

Though at the same time the reasons for such a veil are never quite clear to me...

Just a cosmic game of hide and seek maybe
 
Last edited:
The problem I have here that this leads to the validation of reincarnation. That is the concept I really struggle with. Not that there isn’t a part of me that is eternal and keeps on living. But I see this eternal part more like a drop of water or a snowflake. It is on a journey from the clouds to the earth and has certain experiences, changing its properties. Once the snowflake is melted and back on its way to the ocean or lake, those properties become part of the body of water and the droplet itself no longer exists.

That does not mean however, that both theories could not coexist simultaneously in some form.
Allow me to interject here. Please take what I say as personal opinion, as hard proof isn't easy. Nevertheless, as someone who has pondered on the idea of reincarnation for decades, and indeed with a fair amount of focus on my own most recent life, I am very well aware that I am me. I am not who I was before. In many ways I seem to be almost as far removed as one could get from that existence. So what part do I suggest is the continuity? In some ways that is a mystery. It may not be expressible in words. But there are some facets, such as my ideas, beliefs, and preoccupations which follow a similar trend. Some talents and interests manifest in a similar way. Yet no-one, not even those who know me well, know my habits, foibles as well as strengths, would leap to make the connection. As I said, it may be a mystery.
 
Allow me to interject here. Please take what I say as personal opinion, as hard proof isn't easy. Nevertheless, as someone who has pondered on the idea of reincarnation for decades, and indeed with a fair amount of focus on my own most recent life, I am very well aware that I am me. I am not who I was before. In many ways I seem to be almost as far removed as one could get from that existence. So what part do I suggest is the continuity? In some ways that is a mystery. It may not be expressible in words. But there are some facets, such as my ideas, beliefs, and preoccupations which follow a similar trend. Some talents and interests manifest in a similar way. Yet no-one, not even those who know me well, know my habits, foibles as well as strengths, would leap to make the connection. As I said, it may be a mystery.

If I understand you right, do you get the sense that a part of your personality (ideas, beliefs, and preoccupations) has reincarnated? Repeatedly, but more specifically from the last life? Do you feel that the current you is the same you that lived before or how do you connect to that other you?

I am not questioning your experience. I am genuinely interested how other people experience this subject.
 
If I understand you right, do you get the sense that a part of your personality (ideas, beliefs, and preoccupations) has reincarnated? Repeatedly, but more specifically from the last life? Do you feel that the current you is the same you that lived before or how do you connect to that other you?

I am not questioning your experience. I am genuinely interested how other people experience this subject.
Well, I have a definite sense of continuity. Perhaps I might make an analogy. During this life we play many roles. A schoolchild, a college student, a worker in various occupations perhaps. One may look back on all of these and know that they were 'you' yet at the same time they are no longer 'you'. In many ways this is pretty much the same sort of idea, I am no longer a ten-year old at school, I am not working in this or that job which I did at one time, and I realise that I was probably somewhat of a different person during those times. I had a different circle of friends, behaved in a different way, and so on. The change from one life to the next (I would suggest) is somewhat similar to these types of transitions.

What it has led me to think is that our sense of time is perhaps distorted. What seems unreachably far away in Earthly years may be very close in terms of being.

I'm sorry I have to go now. There may be more to be said but I'll leave it there for the time being.
 
Hi all,

Not been on for a while, but thought this thread of interest. I am afraid that all 'TV' psychics are on a hiding to nothing. The debate just continues. As for evidence of survival I am starting to feel a lot of mediumuistic evidence is very poor. Perhaps I am living in the past, but in the annals of Spiriotualism in particular there are some fantastic accounts of brilliant mental and physical mediumship.

I have studied this for many years, and have witnessed quite a bit of physical mediumship for myself. I think this (rare) form of mediumship holds the 'Holy Grail' so to speak.

The problem is that it is so open to fraudulent accusations ( and rightly so in many instances ) . That said there have been some long standing and credible mediums in this field. Voices in the dark by Leslie Flint comes to mind as a most interesting read, and a favourite of mine 'Alex Harris' by his wife Louie Harris is a great read also.( I personaly know someone whom attended many of Harris's seances and had fantastic evidence of materialisations in clear red light ).

I am inclined these days to look at the increasing evidence provided by NDE's ( in particiular veridical accounts ) and DBV's..There is also some interesting work being done in the realm of Instrumental Transcommunication in the work of Soni Renaldi in Brazil. Marcel Bacci in Italy is worth looking into in this field as well.

Kind regards

Dr Malcolm Lewis
 
Hi all,

Not been on for a while, but thought this thread of interest. I am afraid that all 'TV' psychics are on a hiding to nothing. The debate just continues. As for evidence of survival I am starting to feel a lot of mediumuistic evidence is very poor. Perhaps I am living in the past, but in the annals of Spiriotualism in particular there are some fantastic accounts of brilliant mental and physical mediumship.

I have studied this for many years, and have witnessed quite a bit of physical mediumship for myself. I think this (rare) form of mediumship holds the 'Holy Grail' so to speak.

The problem is that it is so open to fraudulent accusations ( and rightly so in many instances ) . That said there have been some long standing and credible mediums in this field. Voices in the dark by Leslie Flint comes to mind as a most interesting read, and a favourite of mine 'Alex Harris' by his wife Louie Harris is a great read also.( I personaly know someone whom attended many of Harris's seances and had fantastic evidence of materialisations in clear red light ).

I am inclined these days to look at the increasing evidence provided by NDE's ( in particiular veridical accounts ) and DBV's..There is also some interesting work being done in the realm of Instrumental Transcommunication in the work of Soni Renaldi in Brazil. Marcel Bacci in Italy is worth looking into in this field as well.

Kind regards

Dr Malcolm Lewis

Do you know much about a spirit entering a body, moving it and speaking through it? I witnessed one such demonstration, but am not sure I can trust the medium. She remained conscious and held a pose for an extended period of time that does not appear possible. In my observation her face had an overlay of an alien entity, but everybody in the circle saw something different.

I am not sure if this strictly fits the category of physical mediumship, but you mentioned the likelihood of fraud, and I am curious what some of the deceptions are.

At the same time, I have had an experience where an energy entered my own body, took control, and prevented an accident. Common vernacular would explain this as a guardian angel taking over and saving me from harm. Have you come across this type of occurrences as well and is there a name for it?
 
Hi Nicole,

I have certainly seen this sort of thing. The holding of a 'pose' may well be that you attended a 'transfuguration' seance, or pehaps just a trance demonstration. The problem today is that there are just too many individuals who THINK they are mediums and are willing to demonstrate their so called 'gift' to the public. Thus the standard of mediumship plumets.

In relation to the phenomena of transfiguration I have only seen one medium demonstrate this to any degree of competence, and that was the late Queenie Nixon of Clay Cross Derbeyshire. I had some great evidence and ectoplasmic mouldings from her. Overall I would be wary. ( by the way Queenie was investigated by one of our universities here in the UK, I think it may have been Loughborough ).

The acid test in all this is the evidence. Is there good evidence of spirit communication which can be aknowledged and recognised by an individual.? So often so called 'physical mediums' today get phenomena, ie raps, levitations etc of dubious origin but lacking in vital survival evidence. People can sit through these demonstrations and get nothing; and that to me indicates at the competence and genuineness of the individual.
Contrast this with a seance I attended some years ago ( the medium has now passed on ) where an American colleague sitting next door but one to me had communication in direct voice from his deceased wife, and then held his dead sons materialised hand and spoke with him about events that had taken place some weeks before when he was in America which is 'son' had witnessed !!.

As for guardiuan angels, I am open minded about this. Myself and my wife were once in the USA and in extreme difficulties due to weather conditions and other issues on the east coast. It was the middle of winter, and we had an extrodanary encounter with an individual whom on reflection was most strange but very calm and kind...he was certainly unusual and helped us get out of the difficulties we were in. We both think, because of the profound impression it had upon us that we may have met an angel that day, but we shall never know for sure.

Thank you for your kind querie. Let me know if I can be of any more help Nicole

Kind Regards,

Dr Malcolm Lewis
 
I don't find it that surprising, especially if as I suspect, she is the genuine article.

I played the bass guitar( before I had my stroke) and was a total gear maniac, buying and selling basses and amps like there was no tomorrow. (How ironic, cos when it came to bass there was no tomorrow! :()I kept up with the latest bass world news. I met and still keep in touch with a few professionals, I was surprised to learn that many of them stick with a couple of basses for years, and don't have a clue about the latest 'gear'.

If this girl had a talent she would probably have no interest in reading about stooges, mics etc. You might think that she's naive, and in the stuff we read about she probably is, if I was good at something I may or may not be obsessed by it, I may be content just 'getting it'.

True dat Steve. True dat. :)

However, that's not really the point I was trying to make.

Being somebody who has absolutely "no dog" in this fight, and who's interest is purely & completely "the truth", should such a thing exist & whatever it may turn out to be, I guess perhaps my sword cuts both ways, equally

You'll notice several people here have criticised the Zenon's use of the "Randi challenge", including myself, but that does not mean I am questioning his integrity, honesty or sincerity. Likewise with the lady's complete ignorance of what are well known & documented cases of stooges, pre-filled questionaires, secret mics etc which go back 40+ years. I am quite sure that both of these people are lovely, honest, sincere & genuine people who really believe what they're saying & that it is for what they consider compassionate reasons they are making their cases.

What I am questioning is how, actually, useless this segment on this daytime show was. We are presented with a stage magician who quotes Randi's challenge & does a universal "cold-reading" (believe me, there are far better ways of doing a mentalism act "reading"), and a woman who refuses to demonstrate her abilities, but also has no idea about the history of her own field, and mixes up "cold calling" with "cold reading"!

What use was having either of them there, then?

It was a farcical segment if you ask me!
 
If I understand you right, do you get the sense that a part of your personality (ideas, beliefs, and preoccupations) has reincarnated? Repeatedly, but more specifically from the last life? Do you feel that the current you is the same you that lived before or how do you connect to that other you?
Another small comment on this topic. I keep chipping away at this, but everything I ever say seems hopelessly incomplete.

There is a sense of identity, maybe I might use the term 'ownership' though the latter is only partially appropriate. But our language doesn't have ready-made terms for discussing these topics, it's a matter of improvising and misusing available words.

Let's say for example that one was almost saintly and an example of goodness. Or say one was maybe a murderer or someone at the opposite end of the scale. How do we relate to such ideas? In earthly terms we praise one and condemn the other. But when it comes to past-life occurrences, neither praise nor condemnation seems appropriate - in the here and now. Now is now, it isn't then. But in some sense one 'owns' those past actions even in the here and now.

This raises a question which I've asked myself repeatedly. No matter how sure I may be of previous identity, there is a sense in which it may seem like 'identity theft' in its most despicable sense, to actually stake a claim over some previous existence. However this is a two-sided coin. In a very real sense the events and identity of a previous existence make their own claim on the present, not in a superficial sense like a blemish on the skin, but at the deepest level like the name running through the length of a stick of Blackpool rock.

Edit: I should add for clarity that I'm not interested in names. That isn't what matters. It is being.
 
Last edited:
True, but drop in communications and the like do - if the reports are accurate - suggest dead people living on as spirits is more likely than psychic power explanations.

There are also the studies where they use proxy sitters and such.

All that said sometimes I suspect it's meant to be a mystery. There's intuitively something to the Forster saying, "Death destroys a man but the idea of it saves him."

Though at the same time the reasons for such a veil are never quite clear to me...

Blimey, I've been looking all over the forum for this post, and it was right here in the first one I responded to today haha!! :eek:

Your last sentence is a question that I've been pondering over for years now, and I think over the past few years is something I've internally, at least, answered to my own satisfaction, even if only speculatively.

Imo, there is indeed & without doubt a "veil". And that it not only is meant to be there, but that for all our human endevours are proving anything "beyond" it, whether by scientific or philosophical approaches, that it simply will never be done.

For eg., and excuse my arrogance, but I cannot help but smile at all the numerous calls for scientific proof or validation of the NDE or OBEs.

One of my first "dark nights" occurred in my late teens, when I was a full-on "believer" in souls, reincarnation, paranormal abilities etc that extended into the material world. Being able to have an "OBE" pretty much at will, I undertook numerous "experiments" to "prove" to myself I was travelling the objective world "out there". The problem was despite being able to acheive 100% clarity in the OBE state and travel wherever I wished, I simply kept getting things wrong, either seeing things that weren't there in "real life" or vice versa. The final straw was when I acheived an OBE of exceptional "real world" quality and "feel", and many things were absolutely as they would be in real life. However, when I counted some coins laying on a high cupboard, upon returning to "normal consciousness" I immediately went to the cupboard (in my parents room at the time) to see if I got the right amount - there was no coins laying there at all! This was one of the things that sent me into a spiral of nihilism, reductionism, scepticism, materialism etc which lasted for several years - it was all "just" in the head! I am absolutely certain that NO OBEr, anywhere, however good they are at it - and it isn't actually too difficult if one has the desire - can retrieve accurate objective information from the outside world, despite it being extremely easy to do so if it were at all possible. I cannot help but laugh at those who are still expecting these kind of things to be proven in a laboratory!

It is only in more recent years that I have come to what I consider a far more insightful understanding of what is happening here, and one that explains my own numerous "paranormal" experiences, at least to my own satisfaction.

Unfortunately, I've gotta go now so I haven't had the chance to explain what that is, and why I believe there may be a "veil", and indeed how it may be possible to relatively experience a lot of "paranormal" phenomena by understanding the conditions of that "veil", which is what my original intent was :( Maybe next time!!

Cheers.
 
True dat Manjit. True dat. ;)

I think that ' the truth', as you hinted, may not exist. It seems everything is up for question, looked at from different viewpoints. Are you Sci's cousin, or what? :D

Heheheh - It is interesting how mine and Manjit's circle of doubts run, at times, in similar directions - Manjit if you read this I believe you were raised Hindu as I was?

I suspect it might have something to do with being raised Hindu, coming to realize the religion can't be 100% true as given, but retaining a sense that materialism is inadequate.

That said there does seem to be one key separation - I lean more toward post-mortem survival while Manjit seems to lean more toward Super Psi?
 
Heheheh - It is interesting how mine and Manjit's circle of doubts run, at times, in similar directions - Manjit if you read this I believe you were raised Hindu as I was?

I suspect it might have something to do with being raised Hindu, coming to realize the religion can't be 100% true as given, but retaining a sense that materialism is inadequate.

That said there does seem to be one key separation - I lean more toward post-mortem survival while Manjit seems to lean more toward Super Psi?

Either way, you're certainly two members of the forum that I for one respect. ;;/?
 
Hi Nicole,

I have certainly seen this sort of thing. The holding of a 'pose' may well be that you attended a 'transfuguration' seance, or pehaps just a trance demonstration. The problem today is that there are just too many individuals who THINK they are mediums and are willing to demonstrate their so called 'gift' to the public. Thus the standard of mediumship plumets.

In relation to the phenomena of transfiguration I have only seen one medium demonstrate this to any degree of competence, and that was the late Queenie Nixon of Clay Cross Derbeyshire. I had some great evidence and ectoplasmic mouldings from her. Overall I would be wary. ( by the way Queenie was investigated by one of our universities here in the UK, I think it may have been Loughborough ).

The acid test in all this is the evidence. Is there good evidence of spirit communication which can be aknowledged and recognised by an individual.? So often so called 'physical mediums' today get phenomena, ie raps, levitations etc of dubious origin but lacking in vital survival evidence. People can sit through these demonstrations and get nothing; and that to me indicates at the competence and genuineness of the individual.
Contrast this with a seance I attended some years ago ( the medium has now passed on ) where an American colleague sitting next door but one to me had communication in direct voice from his deceased wife, and then held his dead sons materialised hand and spoke with him about events that had taken place some weeks before when he was in America which is 'son' had witnessed !!.

As for guardiuan angels, I am open minded about this. Myself and my wife were once in the USA and in extreme difficulties due to weather conditions and other issues on the east coast. It was the middle of winter, and we had an extrodanary encounter with an individual whom on reflection was most strange but very calm and kind...he was certainly unusual and helped us get out of the difficulties we were in. We both think, because of the profound impression it had upon us that we may have met an angel that day, but we shall never know for sure.

Thank you for your kind querie. Let me know if I can be of any more help Nicole

Kind Regards,

Dr Malcolm Lewis

Thank you for the great reply, Dr. Lewis. You put much into perspective. There is quite a gap in quality between what I have observed in my community and the séance you attended.

And I am quite touched by your angelic experience. For some reason I am less comfortable talking about angels than dead people and hearing about comparable experiences opens the closet bit by bit.
 
Another small comment on this topic. I keep chipping away at this, but everything I ever say seems hopelessly incomplete.

There is a sense of identity, maybe I might use the term 'ownership' though the latter is only partially appropriate. But our language doesn't have ready-made terms for discussing these topics, it's a matter of improvising and misusing available words.

Let's say for example that one was almost saintly and an example of goodness. Or say one was maybe a murderer or someone at the opposite end of the scale. How do we relate to such ideas? In earthly terms we praise one and condemn the other. But when it comes to past-life occurrences, neither praise nor condemnation seems appropriate - in the here and now. Now is now, it isn't then. But in some sense one 'owns' those past actions even in the here and now.

This raises a question which I've asked myself repeatedly. No matter how sure I may be of previous identity, there is a sense in which it may seem like 'identity theft' in its most despicable sense, to actually stake a claim over some previous existence. However this is a two-sided coin. In a very real sense the events and identity of a previous existence make their own claim on the present, not in a superficial sense like a blemish on the skin, but at the deepest level like the name running through the length of a stick of Blackpool rock.

Edit: I should add for clarity that I'm not interested in names. That isn't what matters. It is being.

Thank you for your thoughtful response Typoz. I get what you are saying and how reincarnation becomes real based on the connections you are able to make. My own queries led to quite different results and almost resembled a broken record. Accessing the same type of life experience over and over; sometimes lives were overlapping, but never feeling like mine.

This leads me to contemplate a few possibilities, a) I have accessed the family karma but not my own life b) I did not set a clear enough intention of what information I was looking for and as a result got back data that answered a different question or c) This may just be my first life on this planet, hence accessing my own records isn't in my best interest or wouldn't make sense.

I get now how reincarnation is quite real for some people, while for others it isn’t. It is not a question of who is right, just that we all only have access to a sliver of the big picture and may have different purposes for being here.

Even as a small child I felt that something went wrong in my life. That I was not with my real family, and not in my real body. My life experience can be summed up as an exercise of sloughing off layers upon layers of a false identity and getting back to the real me.
 
Hi Nicole,

Oh, the topics jumping around quite a bit !. The 'angel' experience I talked about. Don't know what to make of it, it was certainly strange. I am not ready to dismiss it out of hand, so I have an open mind on that one, but not sure.

Reincarnation is interesting ( just read the thread ). In most of the seances I have attended it is not seen as a given. That said my mind is more open to the possibility these days. Of course if reincarnation is a fact, then so is survival. What I find difficult is that IF it is correct and we have had past lives why we cannot remember any of them ( at least the majority of the population would seem not to ). That raises the question of how can we learn from our previous mistakes if we cant remember any of them ?. I am not impressed in the least by these so called 'past life regression therapists' who are probably only tapping into people repressed desires. No logic in that to me.

To get back to TV psychics ( that is what they are, not in my mind true mediums ) Unfortunately today too many are being enticed by easy fame, fortune, and money. I always found this to be sad in the case of Colin Fry, saddly passed on all too young. I knew Colin as an aquaintance, and what many people do not realise is that he was a physical medium and obtained very good direct voice phenomena. However the lure of TV and national fame reared its head, and the rest they say is history.

Its also no wonder these 'magicians' who in the majority dismiss any form of survival or psychic phenomena get airtime and have a field day destroying 'mediums'. The art of illusional magic today is well advanced, and I think they CAN give the phenomena of mediumship a pretty good run for its money in replicating what goes on in seances..That said it does not negate possible genuine phenomena in the seance room either. I also think that any attempt to film physical mediumship ( the debate in Spiritualist circles continues over this ) is a waste of time. Considering the sophistication of video equipment and filming these days anything can be faked on film, even if the film released was genuine it would have major detractors.

Dr Malcolm Lewis
 
Reincarnation is interesting ( just read the thread ). In most of the seances I have attended it is not seen as a given. That said my mind is more open to the possibility these days. Of course if reincarnation is a fact, then so is survival. What I find difficult is that IF it is correct and we have had past lives why we cannot remember any of them ( at least the majority of the population would seem not to ). That raises the question of how can we learn from our previous mistakes if we cant remember any of them ?. I am not impressed in the least by these so called 'past life regression therapists' who are probably only tapping into people repressed desires. No logic in that to me.
Sorry - I may be responsible for some of the diversions in this thread. I'll not add much more at present except to add, regarding 'past life regression' (a subject of which I actually know virtually nothing, or only heard of other people's experiences), the story of Cpt. Robert Snow is perhaps one of the more interesting examples.

To get back to TV psychics ( that is what they are, not in my mind true mediums ) Unfortunately today too many are being enticed by easy fame, fortune, and money. I always found this to be sad in the case of Colin Fry, saddly passed on all too young. I knew Colin as an aquaintance, and what many people do not realise is that he was a physical medium and obtained very good direct voice phenomena. However the lure of TV and national fame reared its head, and the rest they say is history.
This is a subject on which I know even less. I will only say that Colin Fry's TV programmes were at least watchable, some of the others (not to be named) just make me want to switch to a different TV channel.
 
Heheheh - It is interesting how mine and Manjit's circle of doubts run, at times, in similar directions - Manjit if you read this I believe you were raised Hindu as I was?

I suspect it might have something to do with being raised Hindu, coming to realize the religion can't be 100% true as given, but retaining a sense that materialism is inadequate.

That said there does seem to be one key separation - I lean more toward post-mortem survival while Manjit seems to lean more toward Super Psi?

Hey SSP!

Actually I was born in a Sikh family, which I guess is more or less Hindu on most levels (socially, culturally, theologically, linguistically etc) ...but don't let any militant Sikh Independantists hear me say that!! ;)

But my family wasn't really religious (which is still basically raving fundamentalist religious nuts according to secular western standards hehe ), don't wear turbans, rarely go temple etc. I was clearly the most interested in the subject in my family, and my parents and everyone just let me get on with it.....I actually begged to be allowed to wear a turban when I was very young, about 7 or something, but my dad said it would cause me too many troubles in the area and social climate we lived in. That was the only time they ever really stopped me in my choices, but I was very young.....and alas my dad was probably right.

Besides which, I don't really associate or i-dentify myself with any labels, religions, race, social class, belief sets etc nowadays, I find it quite hard to do actually, and am only reminded of all these distinctions when someone reminds me of my "place" in this world. I just feel like consciousness myself :)

It's interesting you lean more towards post-mortem survival actually, I never really got the sense you had come down on one side of the fence, even if with one foot?

I don't really lean towards super-psi I feel....I cannot, I haven't even got the foggiest idea what it means really! I'll let smarter people than me work that one out!

I just live with my intuition. And I can't help but feel that the universe, reality, consciousness, being, divinity or whatever.......is just so much fucking more mysterious, awe-some, magical, astonishing, incomprehensible, mind-shattering than anything humankind has conceived of.

I believe we may be like cute little dogs trying to understand the universe, and wondering which theory is more applicable; Is the sun a big biscuit, or is it actually a chew toy?

:)


EDIT: Sorry SSP, I wanted to ask a question a while back but couldn't find your post. You mentioned somewhere something about "the more people who see my avatar icon in psychedelic/altered states...." Do you recall? I just wanted to ask what you meant by that? Not sure if you read my post where I mentioned when I took DMT first or second time, I literally saw the picture of your Avatar but as if in real life, kind of growing out of the ground! Now that what at a point where I was reading a lot of your output on this forum, and really appreciating it deeply......but afterwards I also noticed somebody on the DMT Nexus forums, which I had been reading for days before I took it, also had the exact same avatar, and I had read several of their posts.

I found it really interesting why you made that comment now? Is there a lot of people seeing that exact image?!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top