The Donald Trump Thread

Trump is sort of like the anti-structure Trickster to the globalists' effort at oppressive mega-structure. He's the buffoon who wanders into the globalist party and bumbles around and at first everyone thinks he's here for entertainment and then his antics get more and more boisterous and destructive and you're not sure whether he's lucky or wise, but you're sure he's making a mess of all their plans. In this game he's the Jack and the Jacks are Trumps..

Interesting point! :)
 
I've wondered why is it that all throughout history we're basically living in fiefdoms in that a relative handful lord over and control everyone and everything..... and (we) apparently love it

I think it's worth adding that the relative handful remain unseen, which to me is key, and we're left to argue about the puppet presidents. I think with such an enormous, seemingly monolithic system that helps hide and protect those few, it's easy to become apathetic. I'm familiar with Fromm's 'fearing being free,' but I'd say it's hard to tell. If there were actually a chance to dethrone the Oz behind the curtain and attain freedom, more people might be willing to sacrifice than one thinks . . . There just simply seems no realistic chance of doing so . . . but, as always, I do hold out for miracles. Surely they're possible. Actually, I'd consider it miraculous for people to start getting a better idea of who's behind the curtain or to at least start seriously asking the question.
 
Are Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump the same person?

Are Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump the same person? The normal test for that is asking if they've ever been seen in the same room together -- and, OK, they have. At Trump's third wedding. Clinton says she and Bill only went because they thought "it would be fun."

But it's more than that: Power also attracts power; egos are drawn to ego. And when chatting over a glass of champagne at the reception, they might have found they have a surprising amount in common.
 
Gary Johnson: Why I'm running for president

But there was a big problem. I found I could not sit on the couch and watch as the politicians in Washington, Republican and Democrat alike, ran up trillions in debt, sent our young men and women into harm's way to fight ill-advised wars, and turned our government from a protector of freedom into a threat that is intruding into virtually every aspect of our personal and financial lives.

I couldn't stand by and do nothing. I had my freedom, and I had my comfortable life, but I couldn't accept the fact that the politicians were making it increasingly difficult for my kids and millions of others to achieve their dreams as I had achieved mine.

=-=-=

Clinton helped create Trump: Green Party’s Jill Stein blasts Hillary for already implementing Donald’s policies


Under a second President Clinton, Stein said, “We will see more of these neoliberal policies, like Wall Street deregulation, like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which Hillary has always supported. She’s changed her tune a little bit, but Hillary has walked the walk. Look at the walk and not the talk.”

“Trump says very scary things — deporting immigrants, massive militarism and ignoring the climate. Well, Hillary, unfortunately, has a track record for doing all of those things,” she added.
 
I found an English version of a brilliant article by Boris Kagarlitsky, a highly original and remarkably smart Russian leftist thinker, whose analyses are usually quite deep and are not restrained by "political correctness". So, whether you like leftists or not, his article is worth reading.

Some quotes:

In fact, the discussion is about how to maintain and increase current dominant evil for the sake of preventing certain, hypothetical evil, about which we do not know anything other than we ourselves have declared it to be something obviously worse.

The point is not only the moral side of the issue. Critically-minded intellectuals have largely turned into hostages of the existing system, and not just institutionally, since they are part of the system one way or another, but what is far worse, intellectually. While proclaiming the utopias and “alternatives”, they are not able to think in terms of practical politics, and realize that breaking with the established order of things involves risk, drama and challenges that require a significant courage. The intellectual and moral comfort is guaranteed by practical conservatism that people hide from themselves, repeating meaningless “progressive” mantras.

Clinton’s policy is a classic example of splitting society into numerous interest groups, preventing the horizontal integration. It is not a coincidence that the crisis of the labor movement and class politics which is currently happening in the Western world is going along celebration of multiculturalism and political correctness. And the spread of political correctness, in turn, historically coincide with the “financialization” of the economy, in other words a massive redistribution of resources in favor of the banking sector. On the one hand, the capital triumphed over the labor, robbed it of a significant part of the social gains of the twentieth century. But on the other hand, the capitalist class had its own redistribution of wealth, and the financial elite have appropriated nearly all the fruits of this victory.

The defeat of financial capital, no matter who brings it about, opens a new era in the development of the Western society, and would inevitably create conditions for strengthening the position of the working class and the revival of its organizations. In other words, it is Hillary who embodies the most reactionary project in the framework of modern capitalist development. And the unwillingness of Bernie supporters to vote for it, if the Socialist candidate quits, is not just emotional, but is entirely rational – politically, socially and morally. In the context of the current political situation the attempt to turn Trump into “an absolute evil” is nothing more than an attempt to mobilize people to protect the status quo for the sake of preventing any change.

But change is underway, not only because of the political and social logic, but also due to the fact that the possibility of maintaining the current neoliberal model of capitalism is objectively exhausted.

And if the left does not want and cannot fight it, it will be the right-wing populists like Donald Trump in the USA or Marine Le Pen in France who will strike the fatal blow to this order. In this case, it will be possible, of course, to get outraged at the “prejudice” and ” irresponsibility” of the working class , but the real moral responsibility still lies on the leftist intellectuals themselves, who, in times of crisis, have demonstrated their class position, by acting, in fact, as advocates of ideas and defenders of the interests of the financial capital.
 
Interesting paper Vortex, though I'm curious as to what exactly it means to defeat "financial capital".

It seems to me that there will inevitably be something like a stock market where people have freedom to direct their own financial futures, though I would agree the current system is far, far too prone to corruption. (A friend of mine who worked in risk management pre-crash noted her department was just for show, that all their warnings would be ignored.)

I think there is a good deal of well earned resentment against Wall Street, though at the same time I question some of the solutions and "punishments". High tax rates to fund free education, for example, sounds good in principle but what happens when people don't major in something that allows for gainful employment? I certainly didn't major in math/econ because I had a deep love for either subject, rather I was concerned with paying back student loans - my original plan was to major in Literature. Another friend, who was an English major, once quipped "Unless the degree comes with some barista training for Starbucks I don't recommend it!".

The other part, about using political correctness to obfuscate class divisions I think the difficulty here is how broad the term "political correctness" has become. For some to simply question the economics of allowing an influx of unskilled labor or the possibility a particular religion may lead to a greater number of radicalized terrorists is politically incorrect, while on the other hand others feel their inability to spout ill informed negative opinions on various groups in public without consequences is apparently a noose around the neck.

On the whole though I do think there is a segment of the population that has deluded themselves into believing that the worst sins in the world relate to what happens on a person's twitter feed. I was talking with a friend about this - a comic artist who also works in a printer factory. He notes that despite being one of the only white guys at the factory he isn't made to feel out of sorts, that everyone just looks at each other as fellow workers. He also told me that his best friend was Muslim, that if you have 5 black friends in Philly two are Muslim but he's betting on three. To him Muhammed is a "Philly last name". As such he's surprised that for being white he'd be seen as committing some inherent crime against the world. It's this contact with reality that I think a lot of people on social media require.
 
An anarchists' view of electoral politics... :)

20140713_tyranny.jpg
 
We went over this earlier... They consider "lies" to be statements like, "Hillary Clinton wants to get rid of the 2nd amendment" which is 100% true.

The Republican base doesn't see Trump's statements as "lies" to be excused. They like Donald because he says plainly what everyone knows to be true but the media and establishment politicians repeatedly lie about or dance around.

Oh my dear Hurmanetar Cat, you have changed quite visibly! Where are your kindly-looking, old-fashioned eyeglasses? And your funny hat, which you seemed to like so much? And not just your accessories, but your very appearance had changed - your fur became darker; your eyes are like an amber flame, and not so friendly now; and your whole posture shows strength and controlled volition, rather then relaxed curiosity that was so easily noticed in your previous looks.

It seems that you gave up your meek patience, and now is preparinbg for the hard struggle - probably a revolution? A next liberation for America? Tell me, my friend! :D
 
Last edited:
Oh my dear Hurmanetar Cat, you have changed quite visibly! Where are your kindly-looking, old-fashioned eyeglasses? And your funny hat, which you seemed to like so much? And not just your accessories, but your very appearance had changed - your fur became darker; your eyes are like an amber flame, and not so friendly now; and your whole posture shows strength and controlled volition, rather then relaxed curiosity that was so easily noticed in your previous looks.

It seems that you gave up your meek patience, and now is preparinbg for the hard struggle - probably a revolution? A next liberation for America? Tell me, my friend! :D

Hahaha... I Hope I don't disappoint but It is much simpler than that! My fiancée is half Persian and loves cats... It's almost the 4th... And this is a Patriotic Persian cat! :)

Meowica was the runner up
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    35.8 KB · Views: 6
Goodness knows, but it sounds like a good idea :)

David

I think this is the kind of thing that sounds good but can easily lead to the kind of failures we've seen in socialist/communist states?

(To be clear I also don't think the other end of the spectrum, libertarianism, would work either. I do think both ends can inform the "middle" though.)
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ald-trump-republican-convention-campaign-live

"Pence does not come without baggage to a general election, however, where tens of millions more people vote than in the primaries. He is not very popular in his home state, nor well known outside it, and though his conservative bona fides will help unite the party they may push away important swing voters, particularly suburban women."

I'm not a big fan. (For the record I'm not a suburban woman)

At least it wasn't Newt.
 
Back
Top