Sorry mate we have to agree to disagree on this one. There's nothing wrong with that. Forget about the conspiracy angle, the official story is also a conspiracy theory. It is about evidence.
The steel is from tower 7, thermite or not, fire simply cannot do that! The metallurgic analysis is a scientific and structural engineering issue not a conspiratorial one and represents one of the greatest enigmas to occur on that day. It is evidence that cannot just be ignored.
I am not trying to convince you. I am just going to post some more relevant information that is new and not too well known. So it is for general consumption not you personally and not intended to be argumentative.
A more recent extensive study spanning 4 years by
Dr.J. Leroy Hulsey on building seven scientifically refutes the NIST report. It was only released early 2020.
Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
The team sought to explain exactly how the building fell the way it did. Put simply it is just not possible as NIST describes, it fell at freefall speeds symmetrically into its own footprint. The professor is adamant, the answer is a resounding NO. He is not a conspiracy theorist.
The inner columns failed first simultaneously followed about 1.4 seconds later by the outer columns simultaneously , covering about 8 floors below the 16th floor. That is the general gist and the only way the acceleration, the speed profiles and symmetry can be explained.
Abstract.
This report presents the findings and conclusions of a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) — a 47-story building that suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001, following the horrible events of that morning. The objective of the study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed. The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated several scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed. The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. All input data, results data, and simulations that were used or generated during this study are available at http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7.
A new documentary on the research has been produced.
"Fires couldn't cause that, there were other chemicals involved." A quote from the trailer below. BTW I had not seen this until after I posted above.
Watch from the 17:00 min mark for more info. They also discuss the FEMA report I posted above. Also the 39:30 mark is interesting as well, answers to questions from Dr Halsey.