Search results

  1. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    > complains my posts are too short > complains my posts are too long > http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Concern_troll
  2. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    GS is opaque? They list their members. They list the articles they want to improve. What's opaque? What about it? Ha ha? I guess everyone just a part of some conspiracy, and nobody really just goes an edits Wikipedia for the hell of it.
  3. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    The problem here is that you have the burden of proof. It's simpler to assume that individual WP editors took offense with Viharo et al's edits, than that a skeptical conspiracy orchestrated the events. Your "circumstantial" evidence (which I didn't see much of present in your blog post, btw)...
  4. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    @johnny: Before you read Weiler's book, I recommend a look at RW's Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia article. (http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Guerrilla_Skepticism_on_Wikipedia) @Laird: You wanted a response? Enjoy. I must've forgotten your edit, among the dozen ones Rome proposed...
  5. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    It's all good. Might be true. I was just asking what revision of the page the changes you mentioned happened in, so I could see their context.
  6. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Or maybe pigs are just well-disguised reptiles, plotting to take over humanity -- from the inside.
  7. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Please quote what's wrong with Mr. Viharo's article. Which revision of his page is this? Sorry, there are over 500. Also, I don't argue that skeptics have never removed good content on Wikipedia. Instead, I argue that Mr. Viharo and Mr. Sheldrake and Mr. Weiler et al's claims of an organized...
  8. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Sorry, I'll be more careful about reading publicly addressed comments on forum and thinking they are meant to be generally true, not just true for a specific audience. Good to know you automatically assume (effectively) bad faith. Maybe the reason skeptics so rarely listen to you guys is that...
  9. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    I haven't post links here because I've added them to the article. I've added 20-40 links (subtracting those which have later been removed) from the collective Rome Viharo and GSOW articles. I've responded to every single post on the article talkpage, and either added the change or questioned its...
  10. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Bertha, you're lucky RW doesn't sue you over that statement. Haha, just informing you of the libel content! No threat here! If it's wrong, point out where. [1] Unfortunately, Mr. Viharo's words appear to misrepresent his actions, intentionally or not. Rome Viharo is not necessarily the...
  11. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    If you had supporting links, I might care. At this point, you and Rome have spewed about 30,000 characters of text, with depressingly few actual links to evidence. And those few links have been contested with other links, which more strongly show otherwise. How nice to return for the umpteenth...
  12. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Your statement (among others) can be summarized as: "You're lucky that X doesn't sue." That seems very close to a libel threat. Consider that every proposed edit has been contested as untrue, and not rejected out-of-hand. Perhaps people get mildly angry when they hear very similar nonfactual...
  13. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Part of the reason your article's expanded, Mr. Viharo, is that you've attacked it, and RW defended it by adding sources and information. RW tends to respond to claims of inaccuracy with additional sources and expanded articles. Compare the article before and after your most recent essay...
  14. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    I'm going to stop posting here, since everything I need to say has been said. If you feel the article is unjust, edit it. Both Laird and Viharo's blocks will expire in 2 days.
  15. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Look, we're all using snark! It makes everyone a little bit happier.
  16. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Notice how I put it in "scare quotes"? Yeah. I didn't say it is; I don't know enough to care. Laird and Viharo: Both of your blocks end Monday 04 May at 21:35. If you wish to ask for additional changes, do so then, and do not bring up legal threats -- make statements of fact, not of law.
  17. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Good thing the ignorance in this case is not related to Mr. Viharo's article (which is quite well-cited), but about parapsychology. Way to fallaciously combine my claims and my words.
  18. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    I've already addressed this multiple times. Given that we've added maybe 10 of your talkpage claims and added your statements, after each incident involving a "pseudoscientist", that you do not necessarily support the ideas of the person, I don't think this is a fair assessment. You were...
  19. F

    Rational Wiki deletes essay criticizing Rational Wiki

    Try reading my actual words. My point is that ignorance does not imply incorrectness, and that you should talk to people who know more about the issue than I do.
Back
Top