It did in that report you linked to. You used that report to show that Silsby was involved in "trafficking." But that report defines illegally moving kids out of a country for the purpose of adoption as "trafficking" and makes it clear that's what they were talking about.
It seems to me that...
She was "doing her thing" with a callous disregard for the parents of the kids and the laws of the countries she was working in. There is a market among Christian households for poor, disadvantaged young kids to adopt. The Christian adopters think they're doing a good thing, and probably Silsby...
Are you thinking that's saying pedophilia rings? It doesn't say that. Trafficking is what she was doing, but what is meant by that is moving kids from country to country illegally. In other words, "trafficking" is not the same thing as "sex trafficking," but you seem to be going on the...
Do you have anything to show me that the courts/authorities/duped parents thought she was getting children for pedophilia-related purposes, instead of adoption by Christian parents? Because I've read more of that paper now, and it's clear that it's talking about getting kids for adoption by...
Great - then let's talk about those emails instead of the hot dog & pizza one.
But wouldn't you agree that 99.9% of the time, when people are discussing hot dogs and/or pizza, they're actually talking about hot dogs and pizza? I have not seen any additional information that would make me...
Did you link to the right post? That's not about the context of these emails at all.
If you have some larger context around the hot dogs & pizza email that lets me look at it in toto, please let me know.
I'm trying to see your point of view, but I'm just not getting it.
This is another example where you're letting your bias read into an email what is just not there. Some guy named Don Kuykendall at a company called StratFor sent an email to others at that company, using the company email, that...
I made it about 12 minutes into that hour-long video, and so far it's a bunch of nothing. When does it get interesting? If that guy got his hands on my emails, he would probably conclude I'm some kind of monster due to his not understanding the context of the conversations.
Well, I was addressing what Alex mentioned as the key item, and that was the art.
With the emails, I haven't seen anything that seems like "coded" language, but it sounds like we pick up in the middle of a conversation and don't understand the context, so some people irresponsibly started...
You can have discussions about pedophilia, but I (like David) don't think it's wise to casually throw around accusations unless there's something to back it up. And from my digging into the Pizzagate topic, the accusations are completely baseless.
I don't have time to do an exhaustive catalog, but I'll take a stab. I found this own my own last night after you mentioned googling "disgusting pizzagate art." The first hit that I got was to this page, and the first (top left) set of artwork featured was this. The caption says "OK, here's some...
Well, I did that, and the more disturbing images that I found turned out NOT to be from any artist that Podesta knew or liked or anything. The association seemed to be that some of the weird art Podesta liked, was by an artist, some of whose work someone else said was similar to the art of Kim...
I listened to the show - interesting guest to interview.
I was hoping, though, for some substantiation of the Pizzagate claims. The interview spent a lot of time on the disturbing crime of molesting children, but I didn't find any links to Pizzagate.
For the record, I've looked into the...
On the other hand, if you actually read the email and put those words into context, he's not revealing the elitist plans, he's crying about how the Trump arrival is a result of "celebrity" politics coverage, clearly thinking it's a bad thing.
Not really.
Even with just selective breeding, we were frequently trying to exploit mutations that would happen in a plant to try to get that mutation mixed in with the rest of the population. Why would a random mutation be any less worrisome that finding a gene that we know what it does, and...
I'm not sure I understand your question - the "stuff" that the brain does is all that electro-chemical processes added together. Are you wanting me to explain how consciousness works in detail? Believe it or not, I can't! I don't see any reason, however, to think there's more to it than...
What are you talking about? Of course I do think that living things make choices based on sensory inputs. Have I ever said anything that would make you think I don't?
Those sensory inputs are part of the inputs to the deterministic stuff the brain does.