I've been hammering atheists on another site when i wrote this.
Atheists are an irrelevant minority who blind themselves to reality. They worship scientism and science, but are oblivious to the fact that science paints a picture about reality that actually doesn't make sense. For example, the big bang happened, as if by magic. Particle-wave duality is a complete mystery to them. They tell us (without proof) that there is a multiverse which provides an anthropic explanation for life; but then, these atheists ignore and deride all of the NDE and paranormal evidence as being woo.
I guarantee there is a more evidence for the existence of spirits, ghosts, an afterlife and God then there is for an anthropic multiverse. From a position of high prestige, the atheist scientific community ignores the evidence of the paranormal, and misleads the public with anthropic principle nonsense. Whatever values these atheists think they observe, they don't observe the principle of follow the evidence.
Any thoughts?
Here are just a few problems with your 'hammering'.
'blind themselves to reality' - They usually say they like to 'look' at reality and if say, you can prove any god exists, like perhaps Ganesh the Elephant God, then they too will believe it. Are you that open-eyed yourself?
'worship science' - I never hear them say that, but rather that they don't worship anything, unlike religious people.
'science doesn't make sense' - science is a methodology, not some dogma, if something is SHOWN not to make sense, that has to be accepted.
'big-bang by magic' - this example of yours is invalid since no scientist says they propose the big-bang based on magic, but give very specifics reasons for that position; so it's empirical, not magic.
'particle-waves' -is NOT a complete mystery, they know a lot about both, and about some things that sometimes behave as particle and sometimes behaves as waves. No scientist claims to know everything about everything. But rather they use the methodology of science to try to figure things out.
'multiverse' - they do not say there is proof of any 'multiverse',
'NDE' - they admit people are capable of imagining all sorts of things, whether awake, sleeping, in lucid dreams, under anathesia, etc. But they do NOT accept NDE as evidence that there is life after death, or reincarnation, or resurrection, etc. because it isn't. The very term, near-death, means you're not really dead, but still alive. In all the examples of nde, I've never heard of a doctors death certificate being issued.
''follow the evidence'' - People into supernatural woo-woo things do not accept what constitutes evidence, which leads you guys to not understand how science operates. You will accept anecdotes as evidence, scientists don't; religious people will say that holy books are evidence, scientists don't, etc.