I think this is the kind of topic that would garner lots of comments. The bulk of the arguments were always the C14 testing of 1988, and it certainly follows that everyone appears to have some sort of bias. There seems to be quite a few related papers pro and con. This one in 2013 declares the shroud authentic.
There appears to be hundreds of experts who got involved over the decades. I can't take a firm position about the validity of the C14, but other scientists have and it hasn't let up. Your making a stand on the forgery side by making personal attacks.
The c14 paper is here. https://www.shroud.com/nature.htm
I'm digging around and I'm finding pretty much the same kind of stuff. Dr Rogers does have his defenders though. You have to admit, there's some weird collaborative details. A podcast on the shroud would be perfect bait for the forum. I think it's a credit to the Catholic Church that they have never declared it to be authentic.
Edit: Here is one - http://www.skeptiko-forum.com/threads/carbon-dating-dinosaurs-and-the-shroud-of-turin.823/page-2