Yes, but that should be something for philosophers, not scientists, IMO.
I definitely agree when it comes to the science of today. But, I'm not so sure about the science of tomorrow. For example, we always used the word empirical to mean "via experiment". But, the word actually means to verify/derive via (1) experiment OR (2) experience. In this way I see modern physics solely focusing on, (1) experiment, so perhaps it shouldn't have anything to do with it. But, I could potentially see something like Yoga as a "science" (as many Yogi's claim), in that it is claimed to be composed of consistent, repeatable, verifiable (mental) phenomenon, which makes it almost solely wrapped up in, (2) experience. This was ultimately also the idea behind Steiner's "Science of the Spirit" - that there are spiritual experiences that are actual experiences of reality that can be discovered/verified via a scientific-like process by anybody willing to put in the effort.
So, I see the science of the future potentially (or, more like, hopefully!) containing bits of (1) experiment AND (2) experience. I think it will have to trend in this direction if it ever wants to gain a greater understanding of parapsychology and the subjective, in general.
Also, one could view those UFO guys from your video, traveling via the medium of mind to our story-line, or our Universe, as "scientists", in that if they can directly experience our reality enough times in a consistent, repeatable, verifiable manner over many "journeys of the mind", they can start drawing some definite "objective" conclusions about us ... we're a bunch of spiritually-impaired morons destroying our planet, as reported by the abductees under John Mack, lol.
If everything is IN mind, even the multiverse (if it even exists) should ultimately be "explorable" (I love making up words) in a scientific-like manner via empirical observation, but using the "experience" sense of that word.
EDIT: Thnking about this again reminded me of the scene in "The Right Stuff" when Gordo was in the Australian Outback (IIRC) and mentions to a local aboriginee something about his his friend (Glenn?) in outer space, maybe he mentions the moon too. The aboriginee says , "oh yeah, cool, the old man over there ... he's been there too" ;-)
Here I disagree. Panpsychism inverts the line of thinking: it makes all matter the ground of consciousness, instead of consciousness the ground of all matter. It grants validity to the delusion of realism. I rather see dualism as a valid, metaphorical step towards idealism.
You're probably right in some cases here. I guess with things like this it's never black and white. I can definitely see this leading to greater delusion in some, even though for somebody like me it would personally make me more receptive to something like Idealism.
Also, I kind of view Dualism as a limiting case of Idealism, similar to how Newtonian physics is a limiting case of Relativity. But, panpsychism really kind of contradicts Idealism.