I suppose Alex wanted to bold "warfare is nothing but total supression of morality-1 by morality-2". If bolded so, the whole statement (and my position) return to their original sense. If you have read my original post, you remember that I advocated the position that our empathic and compassionate traits are not just result of social conditioning; they have an unconditional - I might even say primordal - nature. Most of the times this basic core is supressed by, warped by, or even completely confused with the arbitrary set of rules of this or that particular society. Such rule-sets may be completely different, and may include approval (sometimes even glorification) of warfare, torture, opression, discrimination - of everything definitely non-compassionate and non-emphatic. Whether I'm right or wrong this "primordal compassion" notion, is a debatable issue, of course. But the diversified and mutually contradictory nature of the many moral codes we have is not a decisive argument against it - my own view started with the acceptance of multiplity of "moralities". But, as NDE and STE after-effects show, people who lived through them tend to become more emphatic and less obedient regardless of their original moral position.