Mod+ 265. DR. GREGORY SHUSHAN ON CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF NEAR-DEATH EXPERIENCES

Discussion in 'Skeptiko Shows' started by John Maguire, Jan 27, 2015.

  1. Ian Thompson

    Ian Thompson Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2013
    Messages:
    349
    Home Page:
    Spiritually Transformative Experiences (STE)
     
    Raimo likes this.
  2. Ian Gordon

    Ian Gordon Ninshub Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,676
    Now, here, Bertha, is where you might get in trouble with Alex, posting this on a show thread where he can see it.

    Let me be the boring ol' forum rules reminder:
    http://www.skeptiko-forum.com/threads/forum-rules-please-read-before-posting.4/
     
    Trancestate likes this.
  3. Bertha Huse

    Bertha Huse New

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,239
    Pffft. Other than being a hypocrite regarding your ethics. Apparently there is nothing wrong with being a hypocrite. Doesn't sound like someone with much ethical integrity to me.

    My Best,
    Bertha
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2015
  4. I think the bigger point that Dominic ignores is not everyone is going to make a separation between their metaphysics and their ethics. You see hints of this already, for example after the gang-rapes in India some people excused the rapists, said it was biological determinism from pent up sexual frustration. Similar arguments can be found with arguments for legalizing "moderate" child pornography.

    That's just individual criminals and small groups. When you apply the materialist paradigm to the behavior of large bodies like corporations and governments, that's when the utopian pipe dreams of pseudoskeptics is really threatened.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 3, 2015
    Bertha Huse likes this.
  5. Bertha Huse

    Bertha Huse New

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,239
    I find Dominic's entire argument absurd. Of course human beings base their ethical actions on their belief systems which are themselves based on human knowledge. Can you imagine, for example, if Dominic's ridiculous idea of ethics applied to the Allied troops landing at Omaha beach? Whereas each of the soldiers, instead of basing their ethical human sacrifice on the knowledge they were fighting the Nazis, and were soldiers in an organized army, decided to what? sacrifice themselves based on the breakfast they ate in the morning, or that the sand happened to not be the right color? Or decided they weren't going to fight because they just didn't have that warm fuzzy feeling at day break? What intellectual hogwash.

    Of course human ethics is based on knowledge and people's knowledge and beliefs on what their place in reality is. Jesus. Has this guy ever read Socrates or any of the early greeks? How the frack can you have any ethical determinations if it isn't based on some kind of human knowledge? It's just utter Sam Harris sponsored arrogant philosophical crap here, nothing more.

    My Best,
    Bertha
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2015
    Sciborg_S_Patel likes this.
  6. Agreed.

    When you pull away the condescension, word twisting, and shaming tactics most catechisms of the materialist cults fall apart.
     
    Bertha Huse likes this.
  7. Bertha Huse

    Bertha Huse New

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,239
    Man it's so hard to give a Frack about these guys. They come on here, and their only agenda is to spit in your face.

    My Best,
    Bertha
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2015
    Sciborg_S_Patel likes this.
  8. Remember cursing isn't allowed. But yeah, the veneer of fake politeness while twisting words is pretty gross.
     
    Bertha Huse likes this.
  9. Stephen Wright

    Stephen Wright New

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    Messages:
    898
    You are like an Einstein!

    That is a perfect description for a Theory of Moral Relativity.
     
    Sciborg_S_Patel and Bertha Huse like this.
  10. Bertha Huse

    Bertha Huse New

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,239
    Very good description of what he is engaged in here. Thanks. Yes, you're correct. I don't know how Alex maintains his cool- but damn, these arrogant know-it-all X&*&^% love to play you.

    My Best,
    Bertha
     
    Sciborg_S_Patel likes this.
  11. Bertha Huse

    Bertha Huse New

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,239
    It's like saying: you can have ethics without really having ethics! It's ridiculous.

    My Best,
    Bertha
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2015
    Sciborg_S_Patel likes this.
  12. Bertha Huse

    Bertha Huse New

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,239
    "The unconscious, in the narrow meaning in which the word has been etched in our culture, is only a part of the vast amount of processes that remain nonconscious… In fact the list of the “not known” is astounding [and includes] all the hidden wisdom and know-how that nature embodied in innate, homeostatic dispositions."

    "The Feeling of What Happens, 1999", Professor Antonio Damasio
     
    Sciborg_S_Patel likes this.
  13. Dominic Bunnell

    Dominic Bunnell New

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2015
    Messages:
    132
    This all comes back to something I said to Sciborg a long time ago. I suggested that one of the big differences between us is that his philosophy is more in the ancient Greek tradition and mine is more in the modern tradition (i.e. following Hume).

    I'm sure there are some exceptions here, but on the ancient view your ethics and your metaphysics should be consistent and in harmony. The modern view says that perhaps it's just the human condition that this harmony is not possible. It's kind of tragic in a way, but that's just the way it is. So for example, we may believe that metaphysically objective values and libertarian free will are unreal, and yet still we find it impossible to live this philosophy, simply because of the kind of animals we are.

    Anyway, that's my take on it. And by the way I haven't said whether I myself believe in objective values or libertarian free will. To be honest, I don't have a clue whether they exist or not. Let the philosophers argue about that as they have been doing for thousands of years.
     
  14. Bertha Huse

    Bertha Huse New

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,239
    Should what you say matter or not matter to us? It's all arbitrary right? Any authentic basis for ethics is just up to all those philosopher who've argued for a thousand years. So just go ahead, make up your own, and ignore new discoveries in psychology or physics.

    Heck, I guess living by an old proverb is best: Ignorance is bliss! The more ignorance, the more bliss!

    My Best,
    Bertha
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2015
  15. With pseudoskeptics I find two important aphorisms can guide our actions:

    "You cannot awaken a man who only pretends to be asleep"
    -Navajo Proverb

    "The man who wants to beat a dog will always find his stick."
    -Serbian Proverb
     
    Trancestate, MysticG and Bertha Huse like this.
  16. Dominic Bunnell

    Dominic Bunnell New

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2015
    Messages:
    132
    Yes, we've been over all this before. You think that famous scientists and philosophers are able to separate their metaphysical beliefs from their everyday ethical behavior, whereas the masses are somehow less able to do this. I disagree. I think most people are able to do this. But it's really an empirical question, and I could be wrong.
     
  17. If people can separate metaphysical beliefs from ethics, then the moral impetus of groups like the New Atheists pushing a materialist paradigm in order to negate religion goes out the window.
     
    Bertha Huse likes this.
  18. Bertha Huse

    Bertha Huse New

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,239
    I doubt logic will work with Dominic here Patel, but excellent point!

    My Best,
    Bertha
     
  19. LoneShaman

    LoneShaman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,430
    Well thankfully materialists don't live according to what their ideology ultimately entails. Which is devoid of purpose with the most cherished of things and even reason and logic itself to be nothing more than atoms bumping together. Nothing on which to even assume that their logic is anyway valid. They cut off the thin branch at the base on which the whole thing rests.

    They call logic and reason, but by it's own design it refutes any validity for the basis of logic and reason. They want it both ways.

    And thank goodness for that.
     
    Sciborg_S_Patel and Bertha Huse like this.
  20. Dominic Bunnell

    Dominic Bunnell New

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2015
    Messages:
    132
    Yes, good point. But then I can't stand the New Atheism anyway. The whole idea that we can make the world a better place by replacing organized religion with scientific materialism is obviously ridiculous. But unlike you, I also think it's ridiculous to think that Psi and NDEs can make the world a better place.
     

Share This Page