Al Borealis Created a Podcast That Dives Deep Into Topics That Matter |389|

I never said it was accidental, I think it was quite deliberate. But waiting 20secs just to hear the sound is a long time. They probably just didn’t want each explosion to take that long, the viewer might become bored, so I’m saying they said to hell with the 20secs, lets just make the audio and the visual simultaneous.

What about the survivors testimonies? One Big Bang or an extended bombing by lots of aeroplanes?

That’s what I was asking you! As I’m willing to believe that I/we might be easily fooled - show me how. To me, one mushroom cloud means one bomb. What other bomb was capable of producing such devastation in 1945? How many tons of tnt would be required, and how many aeroplanes carrying it.

We all have our favourites David. This is not one of mine.

 

How does this ‘fit’? This bomb brought about the end of the war. False flags like 9/11, WMD and The Gulf of Tonkin incident (and many more) were all to start wars!

Yeah, Lockerbie was bullshit, Iraq was bullshit, Syria is bullshit...etc etc. I’m in no doubt about anything that we are fed by our governments being at best doubtful, any truth is usually simply coincidental, if they’re telling the truth it’s just because it favours the story they want to get across. That is why I find it hard to accept since I’ve become aware that we’re living under such illusions. We blindly accept delusional psychotic thinking as ‘the norm’. People like me and many others that don’t blindly believe are deemed ‘the enemy’, ‘traitor’, ‘a ’bot’, a conspiracy theorist or basically ridiculed and rubbished.

At first glance I’d be in favour of scrapping all governments. Smaller, less powerful regional, maybe by county (UK) looking after themselves. I really believe that if countries were people, they’d be messed up mentally, psychotic! The EU (look at the way they dealt or rather ignored, the heavy handed way the Spanish govt dealt with the Catalan’s), the British and certainly the US just for starters.

All that being said, I don’t know if we’d be capable of changing. Our consciousness would have to rise, our emotional intelligence would have to increase, basically we don’t yet have enough Love. So why worry too much about something we are, in reality, forced to accept. I suffered a stroke because of my unwillingness to accept what I saw as ‘unfair’ at work. Was that fair? I have never felt that it was unfair on me, it was MY DOING, no one else’s - ironic eh? It’s true, we’re complicated beings.

As (I think) Alex said in his latest episode with Freke and Cox, what’s interesting is not the facts, the details, but the psychology (and more?) behind it all? (9/11, etc It would take too long to check exactly what Alex said, apologies if I got it wrong)In any event, this is what is of interest to me.

 

Hi David,
Sorry for the late reply, I've traveling for work. The point I was trying to make with my comments about Magic, is that like you I also thought magic needed that "paranormal" or "supernatural" component you reference to be "magic".

This is cut and paste from the definition of Magic in the Online Oxford Dictionary:

"The power of apparently influencing events by using mysterious or supernatural forces.
‘suddenly, as if by magic, the doors start to open’"

In ancient times convincing others you could summon supernatural forces to your aid, whether you actually could or not, would certainly be helpful in deterring enemies or controlling the King's subjects, etc. Perhaps I am lowering the bar from your perspective to suggest if the "method" works and the subject is influenced as intended, then that is also magic even if the supernatural component didn't actually exist anywhere except in the mind of the subject being influenced. At that point it becomes "real", at least to the person affected, and why I was suggesting injecting belief is "magic".

Also, I'm proposing there is overlap between magic, science and alchemy, it's not an "either/or" in all cases, but a "both/and" in at least some cases. This is what I meant in the earlier post about it being more of a "spectrum", than different subjects with clearly defined boundaries. The boundaries are "fuzzy" and change over time.

Anyway, I hope I haven't hijacked the thread as it went in a completely different direction since my last post but wanted to clarify my point.