Chester Hunter
New
...they will be emotive for some readers.
Indeed was/is... trying to keep my feet on the ground.
...they will be emotive for some readers.
I have not myself received this information into my head from this artefact, though I have had many experiences of my own and some are relevant.
Intrigued by his story and evidence connecting this account to actual facts. Gnostic teachings and a bit of Chris Geo and you have yourself a working hypothesis...archons, Michael Tellinger? My mind reels, as they don't really contradict each other. Wow. More exploration needed. Hadibov? I mean really, its astounding how all these stories link up...Alex- please explore these strands as I think you will find a lot in common. Love your work!!
But that is my deep worry in a nutshell. Let's use "communicate information directly into their head" instead of "download." My response is still, "be very afraid." Forgive, please, but I do not discern where you, or anyone, tested the veracity of what was communicated. Demonologists do have techniques for this.Note here that nobody involved at the start of this 'situation' intended t receive any download. An artefact was brought to the persons home and that artefact began communicating information directly into their head, I have called it a download as it seems a fitting term. I have not myself received this information into my head from this artefact, though I have had many experiences of my own and some are relevant.
But that is my deep worry in a nutshell. Let's use "communicate information directly into their head" instead of "download." My response is still, "be very afraid." Forgive, please, but I do not discern where you, or anyone, tested the veracity of what was communicated. Demonologists do have techniques for this.
The modified human is intended to be used as a vehicle for the consciousness of both the rapidly dying 'star people' and in the longer term as containers for far more hostile entities that can reincarnate into these bodies and essentially embark upon the path to self-realisation through the uniquely designed bodies that are in some way able to offer experiences (sensations, emotions, energies) that the bodies of the hostile ET can't. This is something I can't validate or even hope to fully appreciate but is basically what is claimed.
I think Bruce Fenton may have hit upon Alex's question regarding "evil" in his Four Questions video. To clarify I will regard Bruce Fenton's rendition of "Earth History" as a metaphor so as to avoid losing others before I make my point.
It seems many current humans regard actions and behaviors of others with such incredulity that we are only able to explain it as "evil incarnate."
Within the dynamic of Bruce's history, "the Reptilians" play the role of this very evil, yet perhaps, if we took a wider look at the unfolding of physicality within a grander possible immateriality... from the perspective of conscious agencies which are not faced with mortality, for "the game" to be fulfilling, it has to be intense, no?
This section of reality (physicality) and the ability to experience form at a far more intense level, perhaps conscious agencies incarnate into physical bodies much like the movie, Avatar suggests (as also a metaphor).
What I am suggesting is that "the Reptilians" are playing a role.
And so then the reports of "rape by a Reptilian being" is widespread suggesting that perhaps these beings, in their discarnate form, have the ability to access another being through the same psychic region both inhabit.
And so now consider this too - the incredibly ridiculous state of our physical world based on "human" activity. It seems to me that within the framework of Bruce Fenton's history, especially his suggestion that "bad actors" are incarnating within human form...
...is alive, well and kicking yet also... I can say in all honesty and in my own case, progress has been made (very much needed from the point of view of others in my life)... and why I find myself on this forum for example and where synchronicity connects me to this story - maybe not a metaphor after all.
But that is my deep worry in a nutshell. Let's use "communicate information directly into their head" instead of "download." My response is still, "be very afraid." Forgive, please, but I do not discern where you, or anyone, tested the veracity of what was communicated. Demonologists do have techniques for this.
In the big scheme, we have to recognise the lion is not evil for eating the zebra, but when it is munching on your best friend in front of you it sure seems evil. That is really where we are at with any fundamentally hostile or problematic entities, they are what they are, they are true to their natures, the label of evil is just one of convenience that warns everyone to treat with extreme caution. They too are performing some function, no matter how repellant it may seem to us. For religious people, they can consider why did God make the devil? Wasn't that a crazy evil thing to do? The devil must have had a purpose in the story or God would never have allowed for its creation.
Many years ago my wife received a series of messages from a 'higher being' in which was one comment on this business of positive and negative inclined souls inhabiting humans, it was suggested to her that around 50% are considered to be essentially 'fallen' souls from entities that are implicitly problematic and potentially very dangerous. Look at the world we live in, I would like to think that number is exaggerated but it would fit well with the way Earth functions. It's like a crazy Battle Royale down here, and a lot of people are living what I consider a total nightmare thanks largely to other people.
Again I say, there be dragons. There were never ANY peoples who did not know this until the Enlightenment. Pls cf Alex 's interview with OBEr Robert Bruce: https://skeptiko.com/out-of-body-experience-expert-robert-on-our-daemon-haunted-world/What if the dynamic of "demons/angels/demonologists/necromancers/angels" is simply an organically grown "framework" we collectively created so as to try and explain the arising of all sorts of phenomena which we, as conscious agent observers (at our psychic level) may play a role in its manifestation as well as the form(s) we "think" it is taking?
My only point is that I have found some well received freedom from the fears that often dominated me when I started exploring "outside of the box" alternative possibilities.
Yes. The, 'higher being might have added that success of inhabitation of a human would require a sort of consent/compatibility. So it is up to us to choose: good or evil? It is worth remembering before we choose, Good ultimately triumphs over evil. After enduring enough karmic hardship; Wisdom chooses good.Many years ago my wife received a series of messages from a 'higher being' in which was one comment on this business of positive and negative inclined souls inhabiting humans, it
I'd never heard of the 'tsunami-migration' theory either, but it's easy enough to find Rupert Gerritsen's postulation. I suspect he's never experienced that event, as he wouldn't be here to tell about it.With all due respect, nobody else seems confused. The academic community has repeatedly rejected the use of boats or even watercraft one million years ago, and as such, they have repeatedly suggested tsunami events can explain the movement of humans through Island Southeast Asia. If you feel I am inventing this it shows laziness on your part, not deception on mine. Go and ask a paleoanthropologist how they think early humans reached Flores hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.Thanks for your comment. Just to clarify, the difference in physical appearance that you are referring to is not really about 'looking like their land' (which I do not understand as a description) but is due to increased neoteny in Eurasians vs conserved robust features in Aboriginals. Today we are starting to understand that lifestyle influences us in a profound way via epigenetics, meaning the more wild outdoor lifestyle the more robust the morphology, the more 'tame' a group is the greater the progression towards neotenous featres. There will be more to it than that but recent studies indicate this as a major factor.
There are several issues with Sitchin's work, but you highlight a very important one right there, his date is wildly wrong.
With all due respect, nobody else seems confused. The academic community has repeatedly rejected the use of boats or even watercraft one million years ago, and as such, they have repeatedly suggested tsunami events can explain the movement of humans through Island Southeast Asia. If you feel I am inventing this it shows laziness on your part, not deception on mine. Go and ask a paleoanthropologist how they think early humans reached Flores hundreds of thousands of years ago.
Dating[edit]
The species was formerly thought to have survived on Flores at least until 12,000 years before present, which would have made it the longest lasting known non-Homo sapiens human (unless the Red Deer Cave people belonged to its own species), surviving long past the Neanderthals (H. neanderthalensis), which became extinct between 39,000 and 41,000 years ago.[64] However, subsequent and detailed study of the Liang Bua cave where Homo floresiensis was found show that its youngest osteological remains date to 60,000 years ago, and youngest associated stone tools to 50,000 years ago.[1][65] Previous younger estimates resulted from the presence of an undetected unconformity in the cave stratigraphy.[1]
Because of a deep neighbouring strait, Flores remained isolated during the Wisconsin glaciation (the most recent glacial period), despite the low sea levels that united Sundaland.[66][67] This has led the discoverers of H. floresiensis to conclude that the species, or its ancestors, could only have reached the isolated island by water transport, perhaps arriving in bamboo rafts around 100,000 years ago (or, if they are H. erectus, then about 1 million years ago). At this time, the islands of Komodo and Flores were joined, leaving a 12-mile-wide (19 km) strait with Komodo visible from the mainland. This idea of H. floresiensis using advanced technology and cooperation on a modern human level has prompted the discoverers to hypothesize that H. floresiensis almost certainly had language.[68]
The revised 2016 dating of 50,000 years ago[1] is close to the time that modern humans reached the area, suggesting that the initial encounter with H. sapiens caused or contributed to the demise of H. floresiensis.[69] This would be consistent with the disappearance of H. neanderthalensis from Europe about 40,000 years ago, within 5,000 years after the arrival of modern humans there, and other anthropogenic extinctions.[70] Skeletal material from modern humans dated to 46,000 years ago has been recovered from the Liang Bua cave, strengthening the evidence for a role for modern humans in the extinction. Subsequent to this date, other megafauna of the island (such as the proboscid Stegodon florensis insularis and the giant stork Leptoptilos robustus) also disappeared.[71]
Leading thinkers predict that it will likely become possible to either upload our minds or to fully simulate replicas of ourselves inside silica networks. This means we are not talking about just computer software that acts like it is an entity, but actual beings that are non-biological. We can think of voice-to-skull technology downloads or artificial telepathy used by a previously physical being now inhabiting a mainframe. Either scenario works perfectly well and our personal preferences may bias which we select more readily.
I am definitely stating that in my theory we have hominins widespread across Island Southeast Asia and Oceania approx 1 million years ago. I would also add that my position is they used watercraft and were not swept along by tsunami as per the current popular hypothesis in academics - one that I feel is ridiculous. While hominins are already on the islands one million years ago (confirmed by stone tools on Flores) they can reach the North Coast of Australasia any time during the next 200,000 years and be in time for the alien visitation. Considering the short distance involved in moving from Flores to Australia, and that they have already done all the hard work (crossing Wallace's Line), this is a ridiculously generous allowance. It is much more likely that they reached Australia within a few thousand years of inhabiting Flores.
The fact that the author of the chimp-pig hybrid theory advocates a natural explanation does not mean a natural explanation is necessarily the best explanation when you are open to possibilities that go beyond naturalism.
wow... This is a big point. and it seems to mirror an ongoing conversation the #427 thread with the very excellent medium claire broad.What we are exactly remains a very fundamental question, you can infer from this that humans today house souls from a wide range of entities that have had experiences living as other forms of intelligence on other worlds (many of whom would be very much service-to-self and quite malicious in nature).
this is a point I return to again and again... but I have to say that my interview with claire broad #427 was a bit of a turning point for me. what if my job... What if that reptilian's job... Is to transcend.. to transmute... to adlib the script in a small way that moves it to the light... To the greater good.What I am suggesting is that "the Reptilians" are playing a role.