Coronavirus Pandemic

More from Corbett on Bill Gates:



***
So you know. What do you make of the guy (Gates)? I don't have a good feeling about him. It's not just that he paid for his persona... I heard what other people said he was like in college (before he dropped out). Not real... normal. Then I look at his eyes and it's like, not a good feeling. He will laugh at all the wrong times & smile when talking about horrible things. Kind of creepy.

I mean he lies, so there is that. He refuses to take any responsibility for the children he caused to get polio. I'm thinking since he dropped MS and has taken up entirely this vaccine thing, pushing his public image & the hanging out w/Epstein (which he tried to lie about) so he knew... it's like he has this plan like Epstein had. Controlling the population, getting rid of those he thinks are "wrong".

So, I look at Malinda Gates (his wife) for a clue & I see the upside-down cross. I mean it is upside down. When asked she said nothing. I think if I wore a right up cross... I would immediately correct this whole flap about an upside-down cross. She didn't. Seems like an oddball to me. NOTHING wrong w/oddballs, I just don't want a vaccine by an oddball.
 
***
So you know. What do you make of the guy (Gates)? I don't have a good feeling about him. It's not just that he paid for his persona... I heard what other people said he was like in college (before he dropped out). Not real... normal. Then I look at his eyes and it's like, not a good feeling. He will laugh at all the wrong times & smile when talking about horrible things. Kind of creepy.

I mean he lies, so there is that. He refuses to take any responsibility for the children he caused to get polio. I'm thinking since he dropped MS and has taken up entirely this vaccine thing, pushing his public image & the hanging out w/Epstein (which he tried to lie about) so he knew... it's like he has this plan like Epstein had. Controlling the population, getting rid of those he thinks are "wrong".

So, I look at Malinda Gates (his wife) for a clue & I see the upside-down cross. I mean it is upside down. When asked she said nothing. I think if I wore a right up cross... I would immediately correct this whole flap about an upside-down cross. She didn't. Seems like an oddball to me. NOTHING wrong w/oddballs, I just don't want a vaccine by an oddball.
I saw something about the upside down cross necklace but it was too blurry to tell what it actually was.

I don’t think we have to imagine them as devil worshipping reptilians to understand their actions. We just have to see them as hyper-rational, ends-justify-means, materialists who want to leave a legacy of solving the greatest problem humanity faces: the progress trap.

I think Bill is primarily motivated by his eugenics mission. He’s decided it is his “great work” in life to tackle the world’s biggest problem which is in his mind overpopulation and dysgenics which are results of our technological achievements.

I believe this is his perspective:

For millennia, nature kept the population in check and made sure only the fittest survived. Then with agriculture and large cities, nature alone could not be the struggle that continued man’s evolutionary progress.

War took over from nature as the main eugenics program. City fought against city and nation against nation, the young men would go out to fight and only the strongest and smartest and bravest individuals and the tightest knit collectives would survive to produce the next generation.

This was a very blunt and crude form of eugenics. It allowed some cowards to escape and reproduce. It also allowed psychopaths to reproduce by rape and lack of empathy was not a good trait to pass on because it made societies unstable which ultimately made them vulnerable to destruction and elimination from the gene pool.

With the industrial revolution and then the atomic age, it became obvious that we could no longer rely on war to control the population or to provide some selection force. Conflicts could easily escalate out of hand and those that survived war were merely lucky or technologically superior rather than genetically fit.

With all selection forces conquered and controlled wars no longer tenable, it became imperative that humanity begin to intelligently select and manage the gene pool of future generations. Otherwise in just a few generations we will have an overpopulated dysgenic planet which will devolve into complete idiocracy, chaos, and total violence until the system reboots itself.

So we can take action now with relatively little violence and maintain humanity’s progress, or we can allow humanity to cycle once more through a dark age experiencing a greater violence.

The Eugenicists of the early 1900s felt like the rationality of this argument should be plain to everyone so they were not ashamed and made no effort to hide it. The were able to get forced sterilization laws passed in most states.

But they encountered a great P.R. disaster from Hitler and from some people in America who believed the constitution forbade forced sterilization and forced abortion laws.

Since eugenics and population control could no longer be out in the open, several efforts were made to reduce fertility with chemicals in the food and water supply as well as vaccines. Planned Parenthood clinics were placed all over the country but particularly near low income neighborhoods.

These were blunt crude stopgap control measures to be used until more humane intelligently applied methods could become available.

To a hyper-rational problem solver like Bill Gates, the “final solution” and in the long run the most humane solution is to get everyone ID’d and profiled (genetically and socially). Then AI systems can manage human reproduction and resource distribution and they will be able to improve the human race more in a handful of generations than either nature or war could do in thousands of generations.

The future enhanced generations will be intelligent enough to realize that this was the only path forward for humanity, and they will revere Bill Gates as one does Edison or Tesla or Plato. (And how he will be remembered by future enhanced generations is much more important to Gates than how he is currently perceived by this present one).

When the forest fires are extinguished instead of allowed to burn, the dead wood builds up. Then when a fire does sweep through it is catastrophic. But small controlled burns keep a forest healthy.

We have entered the progress trap. The dead wood is piling up and there will be a catastrophic blaze soon. It’s going to happen one way or another, but if we manage it, then it will be less violent and destructive than if we do nothing.

...that, I believe, is how Bill sees it. I have tried to imagine the most charitable interpretation of his actions.
 
More from Corbett on Bill Gates:



I have just been watching your last video (the Corbet report).

The early part of that seemed a bit lame to me. Sure he pushed the idea that software should have a price, but to be honest, I agree with him. I mean nowadays much software does cost money, while some other very good software is free. However, if all software were free, nobody could make a living out of writing software - and it is mainly people who have made their living that way, who know enough to contribute to free projects later in life.

Under his control, Microsoft broke free of IBM, which freed it to create an operating system that made much better use of the new facilities in the new INTEL 386 PC's. It was widely felt that IBM wanted to limit the power of these machines, lest they ate into IBM's high range machines.

The connection with Epstein is far more troubling, but I'd want to know more about that - did he make multiple trips to Epstein's island, for example?

I definitely don't like his idea that vaccines are all important, nor do I like his idea of identity control.

David
 
I have just been watching your last video (the Corbet report).

The early part of that seemed a bit lame to me. Sure he pushed the idea that software should have a price, but to be honest, I agree with him. I mean nowadays much software does cost money, while some other very good software is free. However, if all software were free, nobody could make a living out of writing software - and it is mainly people who have made their living that way, who know enough to contribute to free projects later in life.

Under his control, Microsoft broke free of IBM, which freed it to create an operating system that made much better use of the new facilities in the new INTEL 386 PC's. It was widely felt that IBM wanted to limit the power of these machines, lest they ate into IBM's high range machines.

The connection with Epstein is far more troubling, but I'd want to know more about that - did he make multiple trips to Epstein's island, for example?

I definitely don't like his idea that vaccines are all important, nor do I like his idea of identity control.

David
I think Corbett’s info and “assessments” are valuable, but I don’t necessarily share all of his “judgements.”

It’s clear Epstein was an operation casting a wide net. Association with him may or may not mean anything. We’ll probably never know. They were clearly trying to ensnare whoever they could... and they were good at it which is why they were able to associate with so many.
 
I saw something about the upside down cross necklace but it was too blurry to tell what it actually was.

I don’t think we have to imagine them as devil worshipping reptilians to understand their actions. We just have to see them as hyper-rational, ends-justify-means, materialists who want to leave a legacy of solving the greatest problem humanity faces: the progress trap.

I think Bill is primarily motivated by his eugenics mission. He’s decided it is his “great work” in life to tackle the world’s biggest problem which is in his mind overpopulation and dysgenics which are results of our technological achievements.

I believe this is his perspective:

For millennia, nature kept the population in check and made sure only the fittest survived. Then with agriculture and large cities, nature alone could not be the struggle that continued man’s evolutionary progress.

War took over from nature as the main eugenics program. City fought against city and nation against nation, the young men would go out to fight and only the strongest and smartest and bravest individuals and the tightest knit collectives would survive to produce the next generation.

This was a very blunt and crude form of eugenics. It allowed some cowards to escape and reproduce. It also allowed psychopaths to reproduce by rape and lack of empathy was not a good trait to pass on because it made societies unstable which ultimately made them vulnerable to destruction and elimination from the gene pool.

With the industrial revolution and then the atomic age, it became obvious that we could no longer rely on war to control the population or to provide some selection force. Conflicts could easily escalate out of hand and those that survived war were merely lucky or technologically superior rather than genetically fit.

With all selection forces conquered and controlled wars no longer tenable, it became imperative that humanity begin to intelligently select and manage the gene pool of future generations. Otherwise in just a few generations we will have an overpopulated dysgenic planet which will devolve into complete idiocracy, chaos, and total violence until the system reboots itself.

So we can take action now with relatively little violence and maintain humanity’s progress, or we can allow humanity to cycle once more through a dark age experiencing a greater violence.

The Eugenicists of the early 1900s felt like the rationality of this argument should be plain to everyone so they were not ashamed and made no effort to hide it. The were able to get forced sterilization laws passed in most states.

But they encountered a great P.R. disaster from Hitler and from some people in America who believed the constitution forbade forced sterilization and forced abortion laws.

Since eugenics and population control could no longer be out in the open, several efforts were made to reduce fertility with chemicals in the food and water supply as well as vaccines. Planned Parenthood clinics were placed all over the country but particularly near low income neighborhoods.

These were blunt crude stopgap control measures to be used until more humane intelligently applied methods could become available.

To a hyper-rational problem solver like Bill Gates, the “final solution” and in the long run the most humane solution is to get everyone ID’d and profiled (genetically and socially). Then AI systems can manage human reproduction and resource distribution and they will be able to improve the human race more in a handful of generations than either nature or war could do in thousands of generations.

The future enhanced generations will be intelligent enough to realize that this was the only path forward for humanity, and they will revere Bill Gates as one does Edison or Tesla or Plato. (And how he will be remembered by future enhanced generations is much more important to Gates than how he is currently perceived by this present one).

When the forest fires are extinguished instead of allowed to burn, the dead wood builds up. Then when a fire does sweep through it is catastrophic. But small controlled burns keep a forest healthy.

We have entered the progress trap. The dead wood is piling up and there will be a catastrophic blaze soon. It’s going to happen one way or another, but if we manage it, then it will be less violent and destructive than if we do nothing.

...that, I believe, is how Bill sees it. I have tried to imagine the most charitable interpretation of his actions.
***
Excellent post! That is how I pretty much saw it as well. The " devil-worshipping reptilians" with the upside-down cross.. eh, I kind of thought it would make it easier to dislike them. At least it would clearly show somebody's ignorance. I think it is an upside-down cross, but what she thinks it means, I have no idea. The fact that everyone asked about it & there was no response... it's an upside-down cross.

So now that we have put the situation in a neat package... what do you say? We sure do have a lot of loons running loose. Do we leave it up to Ai? I really don't want to be joined at the hip with a "borg" that has people like the clintons, podesta, or maxwell in it. I do want to be on the winning side (like Elon suggested/can't beat them, join them).

Wonder if we'd make the cut? I mean I don't want to be culled! I like me. hu, well if Ai becomes really smart & figures this out in the next 10 years. I say we ship the loons to another planet.

One thing doesn't make sense though... if you make a virus to kill off the people you don't like, and just spray them. Surely you'd know a virus can mutate. There could be blow-back. The inventor wouldn't have that cure. I mean I always wondered why the S.Africans didn't come up with something already (?).
 
I have just been watching your last video (the Corbet report).

The early part of that seemed a bit lame to me. Sure he pushed the idea that software should have a price, but to be honest, I agree with him. I mean nowadays much software does cost money, while some other very good software is free. However, if all software were free, nobody could make a living out of writing software - and it is mainly people who have made their living that way, who know enough to contribute to free projects later in life.

Under his control, Microsoft broke free of IBM, which freed it to create an operating system that made much better use of the new facilities in the new INTEL 386 PC's. It was widely felt that IBM wanted to limit the power of these machines, lest they ate into IBM's high range machines.

The connection with Epstein is far more troubling, but I'd want to know more about that - did he make multiple trips to Epstein's island, for example?

I definitely don't like his idea that vaccines are all important, nor do I like his idea of identity control.

David
***
Yes, Gates spent a lot of time & visits to the island. He lied about it. So, there is that. um, I mean it doesn't mean he got down w/the girls but he had to have seen. I mean there was an indoor pool area, they had these little brown girls in swimsuits pouring water in these old fashion giant vases. Pretty weird stuff. The girls looked to be about 7 or 8. Well taken care of. I mean you could argue they were taken from some terrible place & at least were groomed & cared for. But... I don't like it.

When he (Gates) went to the island maybe the girls were not on display. I pretty much think Gates isn't a sexual man really. He wouldn't be interested. Epstein/Maxwell would have tried (that is their game). But, Gates would have been too smart to fall for that trap.

They wanted his money. That he didn't finish college I bet that sticks in his craw... he wouldn't want to be seen as stupid. He'd buy his way into MIT & Harvard.

Still, these people are stupid. I mean come on, 20 girls in N.Mexico to have Epstein's children? WTH is with that!? These people don't understand real children (as if).

Wonder if since they live in their own little worlds if they started making up weird ideas (?). Kill off the useless eaters, make my own tribe of children, hook me up to the Ai!!! They just don't want to die. That's their problem.

All these people with a lot of $$$ why does it always go to their heads? How do they get so sick? AND THAT PRINCE ANDREW! oh boy. Wonder what will become of him?
 
When he (Gates) went to the island maybe the girls were not on display. I pretty much think Gates isn't a sexual man really. He wouldn't be interested. Epstein/Maxwell would have tried (that is their game). But, Gates would have been too smart to fall for that trap.
He would get invites if they wanted to collect blackmail evidence on him.

But how do you know he isn't sexual? It's not like all the others flaunted their pedophilia. Maybe Gates is a discrete man, it doesn't mean he isn't sexual. People can be sexual and hide it. For example, in the past some gay men would be married and have children and no one knew they were actively gay.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a link for that?

David
***
I have actual photos and the manifest from the plane. Ya want that? Or will a New York Times article do it for you? David, you doubt me? I mean you could have looked it up yourself. If I say something, it's true. Not like I didn't look into Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn (his accountant) and Boris Nikolic. I don't like child molesters.

BTW Boris was the science adviser to the Gates Foundation. Odd bedfellow for being one of the tools (Epstein's) picked as executor (don't you think)? :) See what the pervert did was make his money into a trust, 1953, the date of his birth. Normally this would be protected because it's tied up in a trust in the Virgin Islands.

I think all the properties he owned were in his brother Marks name, even before his nonsense. He did this to shelter his income. It will be undone of course, but it might take a few years.

Gates knew what Epstein was. He knew. Now I know there are people who don't care what people "do" as long as they get what they want. I'm not one that would let these freaks sit at my dinner table. But, that's me.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates.html
 

Attachments

He would get invites if they wanted to collect blackmail evidence on him.

But how do you know he isn't sexual? It's not like all the others flaunted their pedophilia. Maybe Gates is a discrete man, it doesn't mean he isn't sexual. People can be sexual and hide it. For example, in the past some gay men would be married and have children and no one knew they were actively gay.
***
um, well I can just tell he isn't really "sexual". It's not his thing. It never was, not even in college, he wanted to know your test scores if you were female before he considered dating you. I can just kind of tell. I mean, I can't peg everyone, yes I know about gay men marrying & having kids to hide it (or whatever).

Everyone is a sexual being of some kind. But, some people it is their interest or even so much their interest it will lead to their demise. So, I can see that on people. But, don't misunderstand me, I can't read everyone. But, when something is very obvious, I can see it clearly.

A very talented psychopath might fool me for a bit. But, if I take an interest and actually look... people are creatures of habit. Nobody is perfect, eventually, they will slip up, there will be a "tell". I mean if someone wanted to actually look. I don't care much myself what people want to do. But, if you want my attention, I can slowly turn in someones direction & they will have my full attention.

To be very honest I haven't studied that aspect of the guy. That's just a passing observation. I guess I COULD look deeper at him, but I don't care about that aspect of him. I want to know WTH he is planning w/this vaccine... he sure lies a lot. oh lord, I hope he isn't a psychopath that is aging, that's such a bad look to die with.

I did want to like Gates, but now... he's getting kind of grimy.
 
I did want to like Gates, but now... he's getting kind of grimy.

I was never a Gates fan. Windows was not a good quality product but took over the market because of marketing and sharp business practices - to the detriment of the US and world economy. In my first job we used to joke that Windows was a conspiracy to harm the US by holding back the productivity of US corporations.
 
***
I have actual photos and the manifest from the plane. Ya want that? Or will a New York Times article do it for you? David, you doubt me? I mean you could have looked it up yourself. If I say something, it's true. Not like I didn't look into Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn (his accountant) and Boris Nikolic. I don't like child molesters.

BTW Boris was the science adviser to the Gates Foundation. Odd bedfellow for being one of the tools (Epstein's) picked as executor (don't you think)? :) See what the pervert did was make his money into a trust, 1953, the date of his birth. Normally this would be protected because it's tied up in a trust in the Virgin Islands.

I think all the properties he owned were in his brother Marks name, even before his nonsense. He did this to shelter his income. It will be undone of course, but it might take a few years.

Gates knew what Epstein was. He knew. Now I know there are people who don't care what people "do" as long as they get what they want. I'm not one that would let these freaks sit at my dinner table. But, that's me.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates.html
Thanks - it is always good when controversial allegations are backed up by a link, or a calculation, or something!

I must say, Gates should answer some questions, but the NY Times article did not refer to Epstein's private island. I think this is my key test, if he made more than one trip to that island, then I think that is as close as one can get to clinching evidence. Note that Trump made one such trip, and then abandoned his friendship with Epstein.

As I have said before, I imagine that Epstein never told someone they could enjoy sex with underage girls if they came to his island - because that could have lead to trouble for Epstein. The lure would be vaguer, but those who went would see what was available and either accept it, or back right off.

David
 
I was never a Gates fan. Windows was not a good quality product but took over the market because of marketing and sharp business practices - to the detriment of the US and world economy. In my first job we used to joke that Windows was a conspiracy to harm the US by holding back the productivity of US corporations.
I know what you mean. However, it is worth remembering that the most blame should go to IBM, who chose to base their PC range on INTEL 8086 chips even though there was a 32-bit chip available (I forget its name). At that time, chips were developing at a phenomenal pace, and this was obviously a bad choice for the PC.

I wouldn't even really blame INTEL, because obviously these microprocessors were still emerging from the days of 8-bit CPU chips.

IMHO IBM intended to make the PC a hobby-only product, so that 'serious' users would buy one of their seriously expensive computers! Many organisations had a "buy IBM" policy, which helped them to do this. It was Bill Gates that eventually broke the link with Microsoft and enabled PC's to develop into what we have now!

David
 
I know what you mean. However, it is worth remembering that the most blame should go to IBM, who chose to base their PC range on INTEL 8086 chips even though there was a 32-bit chip available (I forget its name). At that time, chips were developing at a phenomenal pace, and this was obviously a bad choice for the PC.
At the time there was the Motorola 68000 series. (Used in popular home computers such as Amiga and Atari models). I remember writing assembler code for a 68000 cpu and realising how primitive it made the architecture of the IBM mainframe processors seem. I was familiar with assembler code for the mainframe as part of my job at the time. The problem there was backward compatibility. Because the IBM mainframes had been existence for decades, with a vast user-base of existing custom-written software, it made the instruction set more convoluted than the much simpler way in which a newer CPU could be designed.
 
Thanks - it is always good when controversial allegations are backed up by a link, or a calculation, or something!

I must say, Gates should answer some questions, but the NY Times article did not refer to Epstein's private island. I think this is my key test, if he made more than one trip to that island, then I think that is as close as one can get to clinching evidence. Note that Trump made one such trip, and then abandoned his friendship with Epstein.

As I have said before, I imagine that Epstein never told someone they could enjoy sex with underage girls if they came to his island - because that could have lead to trouble for Epstein. The lure would be vaguer, but those who went would see what was available and either accept it, or back right off.

David
****
Trump took a jump w/his plane not to the island but direct to N.Y.. Many exec's do that, they just rent whatever private jet is available. He went to N.Y.. Further, Trump was the only one that gave evidence against Epstein to the NYPD. He also banned him from Maralago. Trump is no angel but his daughter is a VERY big advocate for children. VERY Big. She would have Trumps' ear on this one. She hated Epstein when it all came out.

THAT ASIDE :) I was thinking about this Gates person. Do we just stick out our arms for his tracker vaccine? Well, here are some reasons why I wouldn't:

1) He has worked to cover up the number of polio cases caused by vaccines (by the Gates Foundation). We have to dig to find the actual numbers, don't just "google" & take for truth the first few links on any search engine. You have to go directly to places like Indias numbers reported. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/polio-cases-now-caused-vaccine-wild-virus-67287290
^ This link isn't even giving you the right numbers. I think it was close to 500,000 kids in India who got polio from his vaccine. He owns a lot of media outlets or is invested in them to control how he looks.

2) He DID hang w/Epstein, even after Epstein was outed as this horrible major pedophile. He KNEW how Epstein made his $$$. I don't like pedophile, I don't like anyone who hangs with them just for $$$ or any reason. IF Gates loved children or humanity, he would have seen Epstein for the loon he was & used his $$$ to bring the scum down not hobnob with him.

3) He isn't educated in this field and his background is with people who do believe in culling the population. I would cull too if we could get it right, but we can't. We can't know exactly who to kill off. On Gates side, maybe if he could get Ai to point to the bad people.. well then, we could give it a go. But, it's too damn risky. We could end up being little Hitlers and I'm not going to risk that at this time.

Basically here is the deal. If I look at a photo of children (a dozen or so) that got the polio vaccine & now are in leg braces & crutches... do I feel like saying, "HELL YEAH! I want that!" Then stick out my arm. Hell no.

What the truth will end up being (?) but, we better look closely at this guy, he's kind of sketch. Do this before we laughingly stick out our arms like a bunch of knobs!
 
Trump took a jump w/his plane not to the island but direct to N.Y.. Many exec's do that, they just rent whatever private jet is available. He went to N.Y.. Further, Trump was the only one that gave evidence against Epstein to the NYPD. He also banned him from Maralago. Trump is no angel but his daughter is a VERY big advocate for children. VERY Big. She would have Trumps' ear on this one. She hated Epstein when it all came out.
I think all of that is good news!

David
 
Trump's now a white knight on Epstein? Man, that is some spin there.

At best he didn't look too closely into his one time friend's personal life while ending the relationship over a real estate deal gone bad. At worst.... who knows.

He did have this to say, on the record, when interviewed by New York Magazine in 2002 regarding Epstein:

I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it - Jeffrey enjoys his social life.
 
Top