You were very hard on Steve for that sort of inaccuracy...Sure, Ghost said 20. I'm expanding on that to make it hundreds. Done.
Ghost said 20. I disagree that it's 20, it's a lot more than that. Like with Steve, I'm corrected Ghost.You were very hard on Steve for that sort of inaccuracy...
... and I'm correcting you when you said:Ghost said 20. I disagree that it's 20, it's a lot more than that. Like with Steve, I'm corrected Ghost.
Ghost makes a point of saying that there are hundreds of atheist podcasts .
Of course it would be desirable.
Sure, why not? I was wrong to correct ghost on the fly. However, my correction was to correctly quantify the true amount of podcast that bash proponents. Just like my correction to Steve was to quantify the amount of people actually rejoicing in Stenger's death.... and I'm correcting you when you said:
http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=List_of_atheist_podcastsSure, why not? I was wrong to correct ghost on the fly. However, my correction was to correctly quantify the true amount of podcast that bash proponents. Just like my correction to Steve was to quantify the amount of people actually rejoicing in Stenger's death.
What about skeptic's guide to the universe?
Let's be plain. Respect requires trust. I wouldn't trust any of the skeptics on this forum as far as I could throw them. This is born out of the school of experience, not prejudice, group hugs have no place in the debate. I'm happy to think lovely thoughts about you and the other skeptics, but only in retrospect. While you're still performing your acts of graciousness toward the world of common sense, or whatever it is you think you're doing, you are in the wrong place. You're entitled to your opinion, or so Alex thinks, but you can whistle for the sugar on top. I want you to argue the evidence, not the context. Good manners can come when respect has been earned.Great! How about others? Put aside whether its possible- who agrees that it would be desirable? Anyone disagree? Let's see if we're all on the same page with this at least. (If you guys want, just like this post to express agreement or post- either way!
On Stitcher alone there is 74. And Stitcher alone doesn't have a good compilation; many of your listed podcasts aren't even on it.
Wow, that's a lot of atheist podcasts.
Let's be plain. Respect requires trust. I wouldn't trust any of the skeptics on this forum as far as I could throw them. This is born out of the school of experience, not prejudice, group hugs have no place in the debate. I'm happy to think lovely thoughts about you and the other skeptics, but only in retrospect. While you're still performing your acts of graciousness toward the world of common sense, or whatever it is you think you're doing, you are in the wrong place. You're entitled to your opinion, or so Alex thinks, but you can whistle for the sugar on top. I want you to argue the evidence, not the context. Good manners can come when respect has been earned.
I guess that depends on your definition of degrading.And they all "degrade proponents". I doubt it.
Right. Exactly. Arouet is treated the way he is because of how he acts. As is Linda, as is steve001, as is Paul. As are you. People just outright don't like you guys. This whole thread is trying to force two groups together that have animosity to one another. It's a bit silly, don't you think?@Arouet It has to be different strokes for different folks, ay? The way I engage with Iyace is reflective of the way he engages with others... Equally, proponent Steve is one of my "Skepiko chums"... Reece and I are battling it out at chess.com etc etc.
Yeah, in general my less public interactions with the people here are pleasant and civil. Some of what goes on publicly is show, I think.@Arouet It has to be different strokes for different folks, ay? The way I engage with Iyace is reflective of the way he engages with others... Equally, proponent Steve is one of my "Skepiko chums"... Reece and I are battling it out at chess.com etc etc.
People just outright don't like you guys.