S
Sciborg_S_Patel
Richard Conn Henry is an exception. How do the great majority of physicists (who supposedly are atheist materialists) deal with this problem of the experiments showing the apparent truth of non-realism? Do they insist that the experiments must somehow be wrong, or find some other way to rationalize it, or just entertain an uncomfortable cognitive dissonance? I think the most common response must be to just refuse to deal with the problem - stick to the experiments and math and ignore the metaphysical implications.
I suspect you'd have to have a near complete elimination of realist models before you get to a sea change.
However, it seems to me that if all realist models are falsified this would apply both to the micro- & macro- levels of reality. As Kaku pointed out in his latest book, this wouldn't mean observers select reality, rather observation merely fixes reality. He might be wrong about that, which I guess is where Radin's work would come in.