Aquila ka Hecate
New
Thank you Ian; thank you Reece. It's, as you probably know, a detail from the Gundestrup Cauldron.
I love to programme - I'd almost do it for nothing.Hi Terri, welcome to the forum. We're alike in occupation too, not that I do much professional programming these days. The last time I was back in South Africa was '94, so I'm quite out of touch with what it's like to live there these days. It sounds like political corruption is a major problem though.
Welcome!Hi! I found this site about a month ago and have been listening to past episodes since then. I'm interested in 9/11 truth, anything psi related, ufo cover-ups and general work directed at dismantling the power structure of science worship and the neverending bs produced by pseudo-skeptics. I live in kentucky currently and I like to read anything I can get my hands on. Great to be here!
It's all good stuff, juicy. Keep on truckin.Hope I'm not posting too much my first night on the forum. Very excited to be here!
Hope I'm not posting too much my first night on the forum. Very excited to be here!
Hi, my name is Sam Hunter and I was really pleased to find Skeptico (via an interview with Tim Freke). My enthusiasm was raised when I saw that the site (and thus I assume the forum) has the intention to highlight any sort of discussion points, either way, as to "other worldly possibilities." I don't have any doubts because of a massive amount of personal experiences with psi phenomena... specifically the phenomena known as synchronicity. I have had 4 very short but very real OBEs. Several years ago I began to document much of my most profound synchronicity experiences and began to study the phenomena as best as one could while also being a participant... difficult, but doable. I have come to several conclusions though I remain ever open minded regarding all of these types of phenomena. I have developed some theories too as to some of the reasons why much of this is not easily "proved." One particular reason is that these types of phenomena involve far more than what can be measured in physicality. But we can at least examine probability. In this regard, my documented (and even witnessed) cases of synchronicity as well as a few significant precog events I hope to share may stand out. Looking forward to this... this site may end up being one of my greatest wishes come true.
Hi Sam and welcome. I'm also fairly new here, although I've been listening to the Skeptiko podcast for years.
Have you read any of the Synch Books?
I was indeed referring to those books! I have them both, and read them some years ago now.Hi and thanks... If I am on the right track with your question... I am about 1/3rd the way through Book 1 of the two book "The Sync Book" series. 26 essays in each volume. It was only a few months ago that a new suggested I might enjoy these books. I ordered them straight away. Even in the sub title I experienced a personally important synchronicity in relation to the two digit English alphabet "gematria" I have come to enjoy. For me, the numbers 19 and 7 have been the two single most important numbers during this lifetime... and they happen to add to 26.
They say a dog is a human's "best friend"... and I have (for years now) felt that "recognized synchronicity experiences" is our very best friend. In this case, D is the 4th letter... O is the 15th... G is the 7th. D + O = 19 and G is 7. So this synchronicity (for me) was personally meaningful as well as could have meaning to the collective.
What I have found so far in reading the Sync Book is that the very key ingredients I have identified on my own which are foundational to producing and experiencing this phenomena have been mentioned by the writers of the first 4 or so essays. This raised my confidence in my own research and tentative conclusions. Note I mentioned the word "producing." It is my experience that the individual can develop not only the talent to recognize synchronicities and synchronicity strings as they arise but that an individual can increase the number and profundity of this type of phenomena. I have developed criteria for such though I can only be confident this criteria works for myself.
Anyways... I am unsure if this section here is where I should elaborate further. If you know this forum reasonably well, then perhaps you might recommend where I should take this subject up?
Hi, my name is Sam Hunter and I was really pleased to find Skeptico (via an interview with Tim Freke). My enthusiasm was raised when I saw that the site (and thus I assume the forum) has the intention to highlight any sort of discussion points, either way, as to "other worldly possibilities." I don't have any doubts because of a massive amount of personal experiences with psi phenomena... specifically the phenomena known as synchronicity. I have had 4 very short but very real OBEs. Several years ago I began to document much of my most profound synchronicity experiences and began to study the phenomena as best as one could while also being a participant... difficult, but doable. I have come to several conclusions though I remain ever open minded regarding all of these types of phenomena. I have developed some theories too as to some of the reasons why much of this is not easily "proved." One particular reason is that these types of phenomena involve far more than what can be measured in physicality. But we can at least examine probability. In this regard, my documented (and even witnessed) cases of synchronicity as well as a few significant precog events I hope to share may stand out. Looking forward to this... this site may end up being one of my greatest wishes come true.
Don't be shy about posting as much as you like. So long as they are polite and represent your actual views, glad you decided to jump in!
So long as they represent my actual views? What the hell does that even mean?
Bit of a hostile response to what I thought would have been well-received encouragement for a new poster.
You had seemed concerned about being perceived as having made too many posts. I was saying that so long as you aren't a troll (trolls don't post their actual views, but write whatever they think will provoke a reaction in the reader, regardless of whether they believe it or not) your posts were welcomed and you shouldn't hold back for fear of being perceived as "posting too much".
Not speaking for lighter_than_air, but I did like his comment, so I thought I would explain... I thought it was fine to say to be polite, but suggesting "so long ... [as your posts] represent your actual views" to a new poster kind of suggests a (possible) presupposition of dishonesty on that poster's part. I don't think that is how we should be welcoming new posters, esp to one who has already been posting before writing an intro. I found it too odd, too.
Yes, I'm quite sorry now that I even bothered.