malf
Member
The key here is the opinion of the "hair analyst". Who is this? What were the differences? Is there a report?
I am beginning to suspect that indeed "the DNA doesn't lie" ;)
Last edited:
I don't get it. Aren't they just saying that they couldn't identify the species on microscopy, but on DNA analysis, it was human?The key here is the opinion of the "hair analyst". Who is this? What were the differences? Is there a report?
I am beginning to suspect that indeed "the DNA doesn't lie" ;)
I don't get it. Aren't they just saying that they couldn't identify the species on microscopy, but on DNA analysis, it was human?
Linda
Dr. Melba Ketchum
September 19 at 12:46am ·
******NEWS FLASH**********
There is a new French Documentary that just came out that used our press conference and website (I didn't participate even though they asked) but what is exciting is that the team from Copenhagen tested purported hair from the Orang Pendek. Their hair analyst said the hair was unknown and then the mtDNA sequencing came back ----wait for it----- 100% HUMAN!!!!! I'm vindicated!!!!!!!
http://www.yakimaherald.com/news/livenews/3168318-8/proof-of-bigfoot-is-in-the-bones-winlock
Posted on May 14, 2015
Is the mystery of Bigfoot’s existence finally solved?
One Centralia College professor said he has discovered scientific evidence that proves the creature’s existence.
He believes the information will be one of the biggest scientific finds of the century.
Mitchel Townsend, a Winlock resident and teacher in the college’s Continuing Education program, said he was walking through the woods near Ryan Lake in East Lewis County when he came across a stack of bones. The find itself was unusual since predators typically disperse remains rather quickly, he said. Upon further inspection, he noticed large human-like teeth imprints in the bones.
Using Biotic Taphonomy Signature Analysis and Neoichnology Profiling to determine the identity of the carnivore taxa responsible for the deposition and mechanical mastication of three independent prey bone assemblages in the Mount St. Helen’s ecosystem of the Cascade
mountain range
by
Aaron Mills, Gerald Mills, M. N. Townsend
...
The totality of the evidence analysis very conclusively proves that a new “Hominin” species with an estimated height of over 8’8”, a 16” foot print and physically capable of striding over two times the distance of contemporary humans is currently living and feeding upon various ungulate (Cervidae) species in the immediate vicinity of Mount St. Helen’s. Furthermore, a cursory examination of the applicable literature related specifically to the ichnofossil track print strongly suggests that there is large amount of additional historical and contemporary geographically situated data and analysis consistent with the assertions, declarations, and conclusions contained within this essay. When taken in totality the information and analysis presented in this paper accurately establishes baseline Forensic Taphonomic and Neoichnologic evidence profiles that are measureable, verifiable, and comparable in the process of definitively identifying and eventually classifying a new “Hominin” species resident to the Mount St. Helen’s ecosystem.
Yet two months earlier: