Well, I was reading this... eh... exchange for a long time, and I think I shoud get involved at last.
__________________________
The initial note (in italics), specifically for Charlie Primero: you insistence that the USA was created for white people somehow misses three facts.
1) The land where it was created was forcibly taken away by these very white people from the Native Americans, who were slaughtered by the whites in large numbers, so, historically speaking, they are its first owners who were robbed of it. Do they, nowadays, have a right to claim an exclusive ownership and forcibly banish everyone but themselves - white, black, brown and yellow alike - from it? I doubt it.
2) A lot of black people was brought to this territory later, against their will, to be used as slaves and treated as subhumans. Later they were freed, and then achieved an equal dignity, with an efforts of both rebelliously-minded blacks and liberatory-minded whites. Does their former plight give blacks a right to demand countless reparations from the whites? I don't think so.
3) Things have changed a great lot with the centuries that passed, and the USA became much more diverse and open than it once was. No reverse is possible here. And appealing to the racial policies of the days long gone is hardly relevant. We do have some principles from those days to defend and maintain indefinitely - such as an unrestrained free speech, for example - but racial separatism is one of the conditions that was good to go away.
Well, all for Charlie.
________________________
Now for everyone.
Racism, especially biological one, is an instrumental creation of colonial empires of the 19th century, when elites had to reconcile two irreconcilable parts of their existence: their delcared dedication for liberty, equality and fraternity of all human beings, on one hand, and their political and economic need for colonial conquest and exploitation of the colonised people, on other hand. So, the ideology that claimed that some cathegories of people are not fully people, or least an innately lower and subordinate species of people, was invented - an ideology of racism. Due to 19th century being a golden age of science, it has to adopt sciency-looking appearances, creatively using technically-sounding language to portray a situational, man-made and thus man-challengeable oppressive hierarchy as a manifestation of the Universal Laws of (Human) Nature that Cannot Be Changed. The very cathegories of "whites", "blacks", "yellows", as well as the very "races" as supposedly tangible, persistent and mutually excluding groups (which they never were) were invented by this ideology-masquerading-as-science.
Later, however, it was overthrown, both intellectually and socially, by the Libertarian Left and banished to the margins of culture and society, where it should better remain indefinitely.
Yet, today we have three groups of people who are still desperately clinging to racist assumptions and racist thought. I oppose all these three groups.
The first group is, sadly and paradoxially, are some (but not all) of the successors of the very Left-siding people who once fought, rightfully and successfully, against racism and racists - "social justice warriors" (SJWs), the Authoritarian Left. These are people who has succumbed to the time-old temptations of the victorious revolutionaries: the lust for revenge, which makes such revolutionaries unable to leave the barricades even when the revolutionary battle is won and thus finished. Still perceiving the former oppressors - whites - as the enemies, SJWs managed to invent and install inverse sociocultural racism and reverse discrmination in the some (but not all) areas of society where their presense was strong, such as academia, high-tech corporations and mainstream media. This reverse discrimination was combined with an increasingly dogmatic and uncritical thinking, which is pretending to be scientific while being nothing but, and a burning desire for censorship and supression of critical and contrarian viewpoints.
The censorious and discriminative attitudes was a true gift for some (but not all) persons among the whites who was badly scared by the loss of their dominance. Now the Authoritarian Rightists, or Alt-Rightists, could successfully exploit the repressive and dogmatic attitudes and activities of some (but not all) members the deservedly victorious Left to justify the reclamation of their supposed superiority. Their ideology was based on the lust for power, which they were afraid to lose, and lead them to an increasingly dogmatic and uncritical thinking, which is pretending to be scientific while being nothing but, and a desire to segregate (at best) or subjugate (at worst) everyone they considered to be lower than themselves.
Thus, by acting censoriously and discrimininatively, some (but not all) Leftists, unwillingly and unwittingly, helped the ugly tendesies they once were defeated by them to reclaim the lost ground and reappear in the public sphere. Yet their unreflective dogmatism, combined with their vindictive passions, prevented them from realising their own misguided failures - as well as unreflective dogmatism, combined with power-hungry passions, prevents Alt-Right from realising its own opportunistic and subjugative nature. These two groups are in fact in need for each other, since they require each other to justify themselves in the eyes of the general public - and, to some extent, even in their own eyes.
Yet, there is the third group in this game, and it is much, much, much more dangerous than SJWs and Alt-Rightists taken together. This group is the ruling state-corporate elite, the Authoritarian Center, drunk with the lust for control and usage. Their main interest is to divide and conquer their subjects, never allowing them to unite and struggle together against their elite oppressors. So, both SJWs and Alt-Right are a true gift to them, since they misdirect the fury of the oppressed to each other, inspiring them to fight each other while the ruling elite may keep pillaging the world as it has always done. And this fight between the oppressed is also a good pretext for an increase of the elites' control and surveilannce, under the deceptive banner of "fighting extremism" (as if the worldwide pillage by elites is not "extreme").
So, my coclusion is: black and white, brown and yellow, unite in solidarity against the state-corporate rulers, since your conflicts are artificial remnants of the previous ideologies, manipulated by the elites to maintain their rule. There is no intrinsic biological divisions and hierarchies which you must adhere to. The cultures cannot remain isolated - their interconnection is both inevitable and proiductive. And social segregation leads to nothing but breeding of mutual suspicion and hostility.
And spirit and spirituality is universal, since no one can claimed to be more or less deserving the grace of the Divine Source, which is unconditional and inexhaustible. We can perceive it through different religious and philosophical lens, yet ultimately we are being illuminated by the same Clear Light of Ethernity. Even the elite rulers are - we may have to fight against them to claim our freedom, but even in a revolutionary combat we must not dehumanise our adversaries, who are not monsters but the people like us, with weaknesses and passions like ours, who were unlucky to be granted excessive power and fell to its temptation.
I said what I thought. Now it is up to you to respond.