New Bem replication

I don't see how it's any more damaging then droves of scientists coming out and saying 75-90 percent of studies are false and or can't be replicated
Not sure about the 75-90% figures across the board, but certain types of science clearly have a problem. It's important as Bem's work has previously been held up by many as the best in its field.
perhaps there isn't a paper available.
Perhaps, yes. Strange though, because isn't the point of preregistration that you ultimately do publish the paper no matter what the results (and in some sense are required to)? Maybe I misunderstand that.