New Bem replication

I don't see how it's any more damaging then droves of scientists coming out and saying 75-90 percent of studies are false and or can't be replicated

 

Not sure about the 75-90% figures across the board, but certain types of science clearly have a problem. It's important as Bem's work has previously been held up by many as the best in its field.

 

Ooh look! Your favourite blogger has contributed:

http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/follow-up-on-bems-psi-research/

 

It seems to me parapsychology has gone as far as it is capable of in the lab

 

I feel this way to....

 

Finally getting around to reading this, but can't access the full paper - seems to be "members only". Can anybody help me get access to it?

 

Put the DOI ref into sci-hub.cc

 

Thanks for the tip, Max! Unfortunately, I don't even have a DOI for this article.

 

perhaps there isn't a paper available.

 

Perhaps, yes. Strange though, because isn't the point of preregistration that you ultimately do publish the paper no matter what the results (and in some sense are required to)? Maybe I misunderstand that.