Sarah Westall, Trafficking/Blackmail Cycle of Evil |410|

#1
Sarah Westall, Trafficking/Blackmail Cycle of Evil |410|
by Alex Tsakiris | May 14 | Skepticism
Share
Tweet
0SHARES

Investigative reporter Sarah Westall dives deep into the the insidious cycle of human trafficking, prostitution and human compromise.
photo by: Skeptiko
(clip from the Sopranos)
Forget it, this game is not for you.
No, it’s just, you know, I was thinking it would be a kick.
Davey, you’re a nice guy, I like you, okay? But trust me, this game’s not for you. I don’t want to see you get hurt.

That’s a scene from the Sopranos. Here Tony is luring his lifelong friend into a card game that he can’t afford.
…You told me not to get in the game. Why do you let me do it?
Well, I knew you had this business here Davey, it’s my nature. The frog and the scorpion, you know? Hey, you’re not the first guy to get busted out. This is how a guy like me makes a living, this is my bread and butter.

Yeah, the scorpion and the frog, isn’t that the way it is? I mean, some of us are just put here to exploit other people, that’s what we do.
Sarah Westall: …he ended up working for the New York Police Department. They brought him in and said, “Can you figure out what’s going on with this prostitution problem that we have?”
So, he was put in charge of figuring out prostitution. He said it took him three weeks to figure out that everything we’d learned about prostitution was BS. Prostitution, at its core, is about human trafficking. The majority, 99% of them are forced to be there and if they don’t do their work, the stuff that happens to them is really incredible.
Then he also talks about the human compromise, the human compromise at the very highest levels. Admirals in the military, CEOs, people running for president.

Alex Tsakiris: So compromise… I get a prostitute thing, and when I say prostitute, that may conjures up the wrong image, because in some cases, yes, it is some woman and we can imagine it like Pretty Woman in the movie [even though it’s not], but in other cases we can’t even pretend it’s that.. when it’s an 11-year-old boy or a 9-year-old girl, or all of these other really sick things that are out there.
But let’s lump all of that together and [call it prositution], then we have some room in the back of an apartment that has a bunch of hidden cameras and microphones in it, the target is going to be lured back in there and then at the end of the day the person who was taping it, the person who has that stuff is going to go and knock on that guy’s door and say, “Look what I’ve got, what are you going to do now?” Or, “I’ll tell you what you’re going to do now.”

I’ve explored this topic before on Skeptiko, and I’ve always come at it more from the spiritual angle, in terms of the nature of evil Because the Crowleyan, Luciferian, “Do what thou wilt,” fuzzy morality around evil never seemed very satisfying to me, and I wanted to approach the topic from that direction. What’s interesting about today’s show, with the extraordinary investigative journalist who you just heard, Sarah Westall, is that she takes us into the same evil from a different direction, the pragmatic, Tony Soprano, get things done perspective.
Sarah Westall is doing great work and I commend her for bravely covering this topic that is systematically and intentionally ignored by the mainstream media for reasons that are all too obvious.
 
#2
Alex,

I think there are limits to neuroplasticity. For example it is not realistic to expect that mediation could cure schizophrenia. Some people are born with mental retardation - that is a physical problem not a spiritual problem. In some cases people could be born genetically "evil", others might learn it from their environment. I don't claim this explains all evil but I think we have to accept that in some cases it is possible that it comes from the physical body or the physical realm and not the spirit or spiritual realm. Our bodies are not perfect in a spiritual sense, they are constrained by natural law and by the need to perpetuate themselves, they were designed to to survive in a primitive environment and to reproduce themselves and that brings in all kinds of behavioral artifacts that we can consider evil.

I think on the spiritual level the point is that the physical world exists to have experiences that cannot be had in the spiritual realms. To understand evil we need to consider what is learned from it. Unfortunately that is not much comfort to the victims. Why is there evil? I don't think we can really understand that until we return to the spiritual realm and can see the purpose of it. In my own case I can say that my mistakes have taught me forgiveness and my own suffering has taught me compassion.

Regarding right and wrong ... there are always exceptions, but for the most part the golden rule is a good guide: Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
 
Last edited:
#3
This episode was the first one I felt like I needed to comment on in a while.

I do appreciate Alex trying to find out where Sarah Westall came from; she did not want to answer it (I believe she is getting propped up by the CNP). I am also glad that you pushed her as well on Trump. Man, she tried to push the Alliance narrative. She tried to shuck and jive, and you tried to get her to be honest, she would not be honest, I heard the cognitive dissonance. She claims she doesn't care about the right left paradigm, yet Trump is our guy. Trust the alliance? Give me a break.

Sarah, do you want the documents that Trump is as bad as everyone else? I have them.

Alex, I got some issues with Sarah Westall's body of work, I have been subscribed to her YouTube channel for awhile and know her work.

For one she is pushing Qanon, the narrative that Trump is fighting the deep state, he is rounding up the pedos, etc.

Well, I hate to tell her, but she needs to do some research on Trump/Epstein and the Council for National Policy. Sarah, whether she realizes it or not, is making more difficult for people like me and George from cavdef.org that are reading the books, finding the documents, talking to sources, to get the truth out there, especially when nothing good comes out of the Trump administration. I know I voted for Trump and a few early podcasts I was on I mentioned that he might be our guy, but since I have learned the truth I haven't stopped trying to spread it.

There are some major issues with detective Jim Rothstein, for example. Sarah claims no one questions him, well some people that have been researching this for years do. For one Rothstein has claimed on multiple occasions that Trump is draining the swamp, he is rounding up the pedophiles and that they will be tried. Second, he used to admit that Roy Cohn was one of the heads of the major blackmail ring, but when Ed Opperman questioned him on it because Cohn was Trumps mentor, he backpedaled, and said that Cohn was not running the blackmail ring (all signs point to he was). Third, Rothstein is a major defender of father Bruce Ritter and Covenant House (is it because Rothstein is catholic?).

Trump/Cohn information: https://visupview.blogspot.com/2018/02/goodfellas-dark-tower-and-beyond-part-i.html

We know Bruce Ritter was apart of the blackmail rings because:

Information on Bruce Ritter:
  • From Decade of Nightmares Philip Jenkins, Page 294
Ritter and Charles Keating (implicated in the Savings and Loan disaster [Lincoln Savings and Loan, Keating Five] which ties to Franklin) both served on the Edwin Meese III (CNP) council against pornography.
  • From The New York Times, Margaret O’Brien Steinfels, Dec 13, 1992
“Father Ritter's work was held in high esteem by the public, the news media, a multitude of donors and George Bush, who cited Covenant house as one of his "thousand points of light." Father Ritter himself was often mentioned in the same sentence with Mother Teresa, but perhaps Charles M. Sennott's phrase, "the Donald Trump of Catholicism," better captures the personal drive and entrepreneurial spirit that led to Covenant House's phenomenal growth.”
The article on the claims against Ritter and pedophilia: https://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/13/books/the-priest-and-the-runaways.html
  • From the Hartford Courant, August 11, 1991 – Covenant House and Americares – This article exposes the CNP and their involvement in Iran Contra without naming them.
https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-1991-08-11-0000213209-story.html

In the early 1970s, at a time when his interest in international aid was beginning to coalesce into AmeriCares, Macauley heard about a Catholic priest named Bruce Ritter who was struggling to help runaway children on the streets of New York City.

Macauley decided to contact him, and the priest had dinner with Macauley and his wife, Leila, several times before Macauley finally persuaded Ritter to accept his help.

When he did, the rise of Covenant House, one of New York City's most famous charities, began. Macauley was chairman of the Covenant House board of directors from 1986 to 1989.

The alliance between Macauley and Ritter led to an audience with Pope John Paul II in Rome in 1982. (Ritter left Covenant House in February 1990 after accusations of sexual misconduct with some male runaways he was helping).

The meeting with the pope gave life to AmeriCares. Although Macauley started AmeriCares in 1979, the organization did not go on its first relief mission until 1982, when the pope asked Macauley to send aid to his native Poland.

AmeriCares' contacts with important Catholic figures brought it a valuable ally in the Knights of Malta, a Catholic organization that has helped distribute AmeriCares supplies.

The Knights of Malta, formally known as the Sovereign Military Order of Knights Hospitallers of St. John and Jerusalem, is a worldwide Catholic charity founded in the 11th century to care for soldiers in the Crusades. Today, the group is based in Rome. J. Peter Grace, a member of AmeriCares' advisory board, is president of the American chapter of the Knights of Malta, based in New York City. William Simon, another AmeriCares advisory committee member, is also a member.

From Breaking the Faith – A close look at Covenant House By: Russ Baker

Working closely with former board member Robert Macauley, a wealthy businessman and life long chum of President George Bush, Ritter built a network of well-connected allies across the country to help pave the way for Covenant House’s rapid expansion. He made friends with many Reagan/Bush friends, like Peter Grace, the conservative billionaire head of W. R. Grace, William Simon, the former Treasury secretary, and Charles Keating, chief of California’s failed Lincoln Savings and Loan, which is under federal investigation for influence peddling in Congress. Many of these new friendships went well beyond a hefty Christmas contribution. Keating’s company, for example, made so many “substandard” loans - as much as $40 million worth - to Covenant, that the S&L took out a $10 million “key man” life insurance policy on Father Ritter, based on his proven ability to raise money via direct mail appeals.

So much money for a charity and so much frivolous spending: https://www.russbaker.com/archives/Village Voice - Breaking The Faith.htm

Bruce Ritter was also mentioned in the Franklin Coverup by John Decamp:

In February 1989, Hill and Knowlton's Charles Perkins
rushed to New York, for a fraction of the firm's usual fee,
to help with public relations for Covenant House. The youth
organization's director, Father Bruce Ritter, was alleged to
have molested youth who took refuge with him.

Lauded by the Reagan and Bush Administrations as a show-
case for the privatization of social services, Covenant House
had expanded into Guatemala as a gateway to South America.
According to intelligence community sources, the purpose was
procurement of children from South America for exploitation in
a pedophile ring. The flagship Guatemalan mission of Covenant
House was launched by a former business partner of Nicaraguan
dictator Anastasio Somoza, Roberto Alejos Arzu, who had ties
to the CIA, according to the Village Voice of Feb. 20, 1990.
The Voice quoted Jean-Marie Simon, author of Guatemala:
Eternal Spring, Eternal Tyranny: "It's like having Idi Amin
on the board of Amnesty International."
A top source of money for Covenant House has been Robert
Macauley, founder of Americares, a service organization impli-
cated in channeling funds to the Contras. A close friend of
the Bush family since Connecticut, Andover and Yale days,
Macauley has George Bush's brother Prescott on the
Americares' board. Father Ritter was a vice president of
Americares, at least until he had to resign from Covenant House
in February 1989, and spent weekends at Macauley's estate in
Connecticut, according to a former Covenant House employee.

So yeah Rothstein has some explaining to do.

Sarah Westall, the ball is in your court, have me on for an interview, Ill lay the information out. I know you will not, good luck to you.
 
Last edited:
#4
This was a terrifying podcast, and until recently I would have dismissed it as way too extreme. What has changed for me, was the way the MSM dealt with the Kavanagh hearings. I think the facts were pretty clear:

1) The Democratic Party were utterly opposed to the election of Judge Kavanagh, and somehow conveniently they found a woman who claimed to have been assaulted by this man decades ago. She didn't go to the police, but to the Democratic Party, and again very conveniently she did not want to put her name forward in time for the FBI to investigate her story - until 1 week before the Kavanagh hearings - too late for the FBI to investigate ahead of the hearings - she made her name public.

2) She and all the Democratic politicians must have realised how unreasonable it would be to stop the hearing by bringing up a 30-year old accusation with no corroboration, at the time of the Senate hearing!

3) She and the Democrat Senators argued for a 1-week delay while the FBI did an investigation. Then when the investigation turned up no evidence, they argued for a further delay knowing that that would delay the process until after the Congressional elections.

4) As far as I know, she did not continue with her allegations against this man after the Senate hearing was over.

This spectacle was excruciating to watch, because it was clear he had been set up with a charge that had no evidence, but could hurt him and his family immensely. They probably hoped he would back down in some way, but he bravely stood his ground and is now on the Supreme Court. This hearing was broadcast around the World, but the MSM (including our BBC) failed to point out the obvious - that if you permit people to make salacious allegations like that at the last moment in the proceedings, nobody would be safe putting themselves forward to high office. They covered it by assuming that this allegation was true, even though nobody corroborated her story, and the event was supposed to have happened at a party.

This, and a number of other incidents round the election of Trump, told me that MSM would even forego an amazing story - the fact that the Democratic party were willing to stoop to such depths - if instructions from somewhere told them to ignore the evidence and support a lie.

A lot of the behaviour of the MSM has become so extreme, there has to be a powerful reason

Sarah commented at one point that whereas politicians used to be blackmailed by stories of infidelity, or homosexuality, nobody cares about these anymore, and sex with children is the one thing that people absolutely will not stand. Again that sounds perfectly reasonable, and it makes one wonder if those trying to stop this activity, unwittingly helped to create this horrible process.
Man, she tried to push the Alliance narrative. She tried to shuck and jive, and you tried to get her to be honest, she would not be honest, I heard the cognitive dissonance. A. She claims she doesn't care about the right left paradigm, yet Trump is our guy.
I must say, I don't agree, she seemed to be cautious and to answer as best as possible. It is, of course, always hard to prove a negative. If you really have evidence that would implicate Trump in the worst behaviour (as opposed to evidence that he was friends with Jeffrey Epstein) how come all the journalists scouring the globe for evidence against Trump could not find anything, and had to make do with a old tape of him playfully boasting about how he grabbed women by the pussy - crude, but insufficient to pass the evidence to Clinton. Indeed, how come that someone from the Deep State didn't confront him with evidence that he did such things (as Sarah described they do) and force him to withdraw from the race?

David
 
Last edited:
#5
This was a terrifying podcast, and until recently I would have dismissed it as way too extreme. What has changed for me, was the way the MSM dealt with the Kavanagh hearings. I think the facts were pretty clear:

1) The Democratic Party were utterly opposed to the election of Judge Kavanagh, and somehow conveniently they found a woman who claimed to have been assaulted by this man decades ago. She didn't go to the police, but to the Democratic Party, and again very conveniently she did not want to put her name forward in time for the FBI to investigate her story - until 1 week before the Kavanagh hearings - too late for the FBI to investigate ahead of the hearings - she made her name public.

2) She and all the Democratic politicians must have realised how unreasonable it would be to stop the hearing by bringing up a 30-year old accusation with no corroboration, at the time of the Senate hearing!

3) She and the Democrat Senators argued for a 1-week delay while the FBI did an investigation. Then when the investigation turned up no evidence, they argued for a further delay knowing that that would delay the process until after the Congressional elections.

4) As far as I know, she did not continue with her allegations against this man after the Senate hearing was over.

This spectacle was excruciating to watch, because it was clear he had been set up with a charge that had no evidence, but could hurt him and his family immensely. They probably hoped he would back down in some way, but he bravely stood his ground and is now on the Supreme Court. This hearing was broadcast around the World, but the MSM (including our BBC) failed to point out the obvious - that if you permit people to make salacious allegations like that at the last moment in the proceedings, nobody would be safe putting themselves forward to high office. They covered it by assuming that this allegation was true, even though nobody corroborated her story, and the event was supposed to have happened at a party.

This, and a number of other incidents round the election of Trump, told me that MSM would even forego an amazing story - the fact that the Democratic party were willing to stoop to such depths - if instructions from somewhere told them to ignore the evidence and support a lie.

A lot of the behaviour of the MSM has become so extreme, there has to be a powerful reason

Sarah commented at one point that whereas politicians used to be blackmailed by stories of infidelity, or homosexuality, nobody cares about these anymore, and sex with children is the one thing that people absolutely will not stand. Again that sounds perfectly reasonable, and it makes one wonder if those trying to stop this activity, unwittingly helped to create this horrible process.

I must say, I don't agree, she seemed to be cautious and to answer as best as possible. It is, of course, always hard to prove a negative. If you really have evidence that would implicate Trump in the worst behaviour (as opposed to evidence that he was friends with Jeffrey Epstein) how come all the journalists scouring the globe for evidence against Trump could not find anything, and had to make do with a old tape of him playfully boasting about how he grabbed women by the pussy - crude, but insufficient to pass the evidence to Clinton. Indeed, how come that someone from the Deep State didn't confront him with evidence that he did such things (as Sarah described they do) and force him to withdraw from the race?

David
Because they are all the same at the top it is that simple. Ever seen the great movie Trading Places? It is a one dollar bet to them.

Yes, the 4th column would definitely come out against Trump with the blackmail that is out there because they love Clinton. Can you feel how hard I am rolling my eyes? They popped out of my head, retinal detachment.

Kavanaugh is a scumbag. He covered up the Vince Foster murder as prosecutor.

After his Supreme Court clerkship, Kavanaugh again worked for Ken Starr until 1997 as an Associate Counsel in the Office of the Independent Counsel with colleagues and Alex Azar. In that capacity, he reopened an investigation into the 1993 gunshot death of Vincent Foster.


From 1997 to 1998, Kavanaugh was a partner at the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis (the law firm that would later represent Jeffrey Epstein. In 1999, Kavanaugh rejoined the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis as a partner.

Ask yourself why Kavanaugh has ruled with the liberal justices lately? https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ka...ing-blow-to-tech-giant-in-app-store-challenge

He keeps doing it again and again.

FILL THE SWAMP TO DRAIN THE SWAMP!

https://www.justice-integrity.org/1...hat-holds-secrets-that-could-bring-down-trump
https://www.justice-integrity.org/1456-new-information-emerges-in-maria-story

My work on it so far:

 
Last edited:
#6
Alex,

I think there are limits to neuroplasticity. For example it is not realistic to expect that mediation could cure schizophrenia. Some people are born with mental retardation - that is a physical problem not a spiritual problem. In some cases people could be born genetically "evil", others might learn it from their environment. I don't claim this explains all evil but I think we have to accept that in some cases it is possible that it comes from the physical body or the physical realm and not the spirit or spiritual realm. Our bodies are not perfect in a spiritual sense, they are constrained by natural law and by the need to perpetuate themselves, they were designed to to survive in a primitive environment and to reproduce themselves and that brings in all kinds of behavioral artifacts that we can consider evil.

I think on the spiritual level the point is that the physical world exists to have experiences that cannot be had in the spiritual realms. To understand evil we need to consider what is learned from it. Unfortunately that is not much comfort to the victims. Why is there evil? I don't think we can really understand that until we return to the spiritual realm and can see the purpose of it. In my own case I can say that my mistakes have taught me forgiveness and my own suffering has taught me compassion.

Regarding right and wrong ... there are always exceptions, but for the most part the golden rule is a good guide: Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
https://educateinspirechange.org/sp...ve-mental-illness-is-something-else-entirely/
 
#9
Great interview and a fascinating, complex - albeit extremely unpleasant - subject under discussion.

IMO, the old traditional religions get closer to the truth of evil and modern psychology and new agey gobbeldy guck gets it totally wrong - e.g. we are all little sparks of The Light and God is everything and God is good therefore we are all good and there is no evil; just ignorance on a learning journey (Sugary sweet feel good BS. Yuck!).

From direct experience and from my studies/training, I know that psychopaths are born the way they are ( or make a decision very early in life) and the way they are is pretty much being a junior Devil, in service to the spiritual force known as Satan. Yes, if they sense that you are kind hearted, thus susceptible to their lies, they will tell you all about how they had abusive childhoods, how they want to be good, how they can change, etc. But that is always a manipulation. Their parents are as likely as caring and normal in all regards as not; no more or less than any random sample of the general population. And there are plenty of people who came from truly abusive homes that are not psychopaths. They may have issues, but they are not persistent evil doers that cannot imagine anything other than doing evil.

Even people who study psychopathy often miss, what to me, is the key attribute - beyond total disregard for the rights of others, there is a true enjoyment of causing harm to others. In fact, it is the only thing that psychopaths enjoy. Getting over on others via lies and scams gives them a measure of glee (sometimes called "dupers delight"), but damaging the souls of others, deeply and permanently, really gets them off. As does making puppets of them (though to a lesser extent because they become bored with their current puppets and constantly seek new ones).

These people are not "ignorant" of what they are doing. If you really get to know one of them (as I have) and they, after much testing, realize that you are not vulnerable to their machinations, yet are not going to reveal them for what they are to others (one of their greatest concerns), then they will open up to you a bit - in a way, it's like they're throwing down the gauntlet. It's a challenge and the terms are laid out on the table. They will explain, sometimes in so many words, that they are evil and that facing someone who understands that will be a great game. As an aside, never deliberately seek to be in that position. If you encounter such a person, get away and stay away. Give them nothing of yourself. Do not underestimate their primal ability to perceive your vulnerabilities. Quietly leave the scene. Do not attempt to save any of their puppets. That will go South on you very quickly. The puppets are more beholden to the evil one than you can imagine and they will sell you out.

Evil likes to hide and deny it exists. You can't be on guard against that which you think doesn't exist. There's a tie into the materialist ideology of the modern era. It aids and abets evil, mostly by accident I imagine, but sometimes maybe on purpose. There's also a tie to all the social justice silliness in which all cultures are equal - capturing thousands of your neighbors so you can rip out their still beating hearts until the temple is red with rivers of blood is not the equivalent of Christianity or Buddhism. It's being in service to evil (a concept that social justice warriors won't discuss unless it has to do with capitalism, Christianity and white people).

Then there are the many who are lost, but not born psychopaths, that have come under these people's spells/control. They become compromised and lack the courage or moral compass to extricate themselves. They were lured via weakness, the promise of instant gratification, physical pleasure, etc...the usual temptations. Such people become soldiers in the psychopath's army.

Mind you, I'm not talking about hard men (and women) that have to make tough decisions; like CEOs laying people off to save the company or a general that must accept certain levels of casualties in order to win the war. I am talking about people, who, despite a façade to the contrary, are actually joyless except for causing harm, who are irresponsible in all areas that normal people take pride in doing right, people who have no shame in any area of their lives, who feign normal emotions, who manipulate where normals express love and friendship, who lie even when the truth would be better for them, who practice deception in everything they do, people who have no conscience. Yes. Such people exist. They aren't all serial killers. In fact most are not.

They are out there, with varying levels of ambition, intelligence and competence. I'm not even sure they are totally the same species as the rest of us. They maybe some kind of subspecies. They are tuned into a radically different vibration than most of us....and they want to get you tuned in with them. Always as their slave, though, and not their equals.

Children are, naturally, a delicious and easy target for these people. No surprise there.
 
Last edited:
#11
In some cases the shamans may be right. But in other cases not. There are many different types of mental illness and some of them have complex symptoms that are best explained by biological causes.
I should have added that I have experience with spirit communication which I've describe in part here: http://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/psi_experience

And I've also studied spiritual healing and collected seven affidavits of healing for a healing certification program which included psychological healing.

And I have a master's degree in Molecular Biology

I am as qualified as any shaman and probably better qualified than many to have an opinion on this subject.
 
Last edited:
#12
hi John... this is a great post... with tons of information... So let me ask you a couple questions...

Sarah, do you want the documents that Trump is as bad as everyone else? I have them.
do you think Trump is different / better than Podesta? does the satanic angle make a difference to you (real question)?


For one she is pushing Qanon, the narrative that Trump is fighting the deep state, he is rounding up the pedos, etc.
IDK, but it does seem possible / likely that at some time this was actually true... even though it's no longer true. do you entertain this is a possibility?




There are some major issues with detective Jim Rothstein, for example. Sarah claims no one questions him, well some people that have been researching this for years do. For one Rothstein has claimed on multiple occasions that Trump is draining the swamp, he is rounding up the pedophiles and that they will be tried. Second, he used to admit that Roy Cohn was one of the heads of the major blackmail ring, but when Ed Opperman questioned him on it because Cohn was Trumps mentor, he backpedaled, and said that Cohn was not running the blackmail ring (all signs point to he was).
this is very interesting... I remember hearing Rothstein say that Cohn was a stand-up guy ( which seemed outrageous to me at the time ). I searched and searched for this quote but couldn't find it. did he say that during the ed opperman interview?

Third, Rothstein is a major defender of father Bruce Ritter and Covenant House (is it because Rothstein is catholic?).
Trump/Cohn information: https://visupview.blogspot.com/2018/02/goodfellas-dark-tower-and-beyond-part-i.html
post looks good but I didn't see the link to covenant house and Ritter???
 
#13
#15
hi John... this is a great post... with tons of information... So let me ask you a couple questions...


do you think Trump is different / better than Podesta? does the satanic angle make a difference to you (real question)?



IDK, but it does seem possible / likely that at some time this was actually true... even though it's no longer true. do you entertain this is a possibility?





this is very interesting... I remember hearing Rothstein say that Cohn was a stand-up guy ( which seemed outrageous to me at the time ). I searched and searched for this quote but couldn't find it. did he say that during the ed opperman interview?


post looks good but I didn't see the link to covenant house and Ritter???
Trump is worse than Podesta, why? Because he is president of the United States and the figurehead of our country.

Now are you asking does Trump do horrendous things like the allegations against the Podesta's. Of course he does.

Read the two articles I linked from Wayne Madsen.

Listen to these:



Trump is a luciferian like the rest of them.

I believe in most cases there were no "satanic panic" and labeling it as such makes me angry, very angry, it is disingenuous. With McMartin for example at the very least molestation's occurred at most it was satanic ritual abuse in the most high.

Read the Witch Hunt Narrative by Ross E. Cheit for information, it is a book that leaves the satanic ritual abuse narrative out, but shows that many, many molestation's and cases were legit during that time period.


That Trump was compromised and he was rounding up pedos? Sure I believe it is possible at .00000001% odds.

Trump was the Council for National Policy's president. We are living in the 1980's again. Reagan part deux.

All those pedo arrests for sex trafficking? Mostly just John's and many, many above aged women. Granted I am glad they were rescued.

https://www.businessinsider.com/george-nader-elliot-broidy-photo-with-trump-2018-5
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...ator-who-ensnared-victim-at-mar-a-lago-report

The blog series by Visup I linked was on Roy Cohn and Trump and the pedophile network.

The Bruce Ritter stuff is after that, that is my research from other sources.
 
Last edited:
#16
Trump is worse than Podesta, why? Because he is president of the United States and the figurehead of our country.

Now are you asking does Trump do horrendous things like the allegations against the Podesta's. Of course he does.

Read the two articles I linked from Wayne Madsen.

Listen to these:



Trump is a luciferian like the rest of them.

I believe in most cases there were no "satanic panic" and labeling it as such makes me angry, very angry, it is disingenuous. With McMartin for example at the very least molestation's occurred at most it was satanic ritual abuse in the most high.

Read the Witch Hunt Narrative by Ross E. Cheit for information, it is a book that leaves the satanic ritual abuse narrative out, but shows that many, many molestation's and cases were legit during that time period.


That Trump was compromised and he was rounding up pedos? Sure I believe it is possible at .00000001% odds.

Trump was the Council for National Policy's president. We are living in the 1980's again. Reagan part deux.

All those pedo arrests for sex trafficking? Mostly just John's and many, many above aged women. Granted I am glad they were rescued.

https://www.businessinsider.com/george-nader-elliot-broidy-photo-with-trump-2018-5
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...ator-who-ensnared-victim-at-mar-a-lago-report

The blog series by Visup I linked was on Roy Cohn and Trump and the pedophile network.

The Bruce Ritter stuff is after that, that is my research from other sources.
What exactly is a luciferian?
 
#18
Trump is worse than Podesta, why? Because he is president of the United States and the figurehead of our country.

Now are you asking does Trump do horrendous things like the allegations against the Podesta's. Of course he does.

Read the two articles I linked from Wayne Madsen.

Listen to these:



Trump is a luciferian like the rest of them.

I believe in most cases there were no "satanic panic" and labeling it as such makes me angry, very angry, it is disingenuous. With McMartin for example at the very least molestation's occurred at most it was satanic ritual abuse in the most high.

Read the Witch Hunt Narrative by Ross E. Cheit for information, it is a book that leaves the satanic ritual abuse narrative out, but shows that many, many molestation's and cases were legit during that time period.


That Trump was compromised and he was rounding up pedos? Sure I believe it is possible at .00000001% odds.

Trump was the Council for National Policy's president. We are living in the 1980's again. Reagan part deux.

All those pedo arrests for sex trafficking? Mostly just John's and many, many above aged women. Granted I am glad they were rescued.

https://www.businessinsider.com/george-nader-elliot-broidy-photo-with-trump-2018-5
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...ator-who-ensnared-victim-at-mar-a-lago-report

The blog series by Visup I linked was on Roy Cohn and Trump and the pedophile network.

The Bruce Ritter stuff is after that, that is my research from other sources.
Well some Opperman dude says it's true, then it must be. By golly he's gotta podcast an everything. It's right there on the innernet. It must be true. An he's a certified genuuuwhine PI and everything. Good guy. Real smart like too. Only interest is getting the real truth out there. I ken jus tell.

Sheesh, in the world of "evidence" it's like not being able to discern between a two day old Big Mac in the back of your friend's moldy refrigerator and a fine porterhouse at a 5 star restaurant. Uh yeah, all the same to me.

Icke disagrees with you that they're Luciferian. He says they're lizard people from Alpha Centauri.

Who you gonna believe, Opperman report or Icke? Tough one, eh?

But there's no reason that Lizard people can't be Luciferian too. So I propose the Luciferian Lizard People theory supported by ample available internet cites. Trump is clearly their commanding officer on earth.

My God. A guest has a passionate and possibly informed interview about something as horrible, but real, as child sex trafficking networks and touches on something as important as evil itself, and we have to dive, immediately, into the deep end of goofy ass internet conspiracy theories about Trump, etc. IMO, delving into such poorly (I'm being generous) supported allegations demeans an important topic. It's sort of like the boy who cried wolf, but this is the boy who cried "Luciferian child molester!" or "Lizard People!"

And if you're going to impugn a man's character, you'd should have more than hearsay and innuendo. That's just my old fashioned (pre-social media) opinion.
 
#19
IMO, the old traditional religions get closer to the truth of evil and modern psychology and new agey gobbeldy guck gets it totally wrong - e.g. we are all little sparks of The Light and God is everything and God is good therefore we are all good and there is no evil; just ignorance on a learning journey (Sugary sweet feel good BS. Yuck!).
buddhism is really old... this is what they say.
 
#20
buddhism is really old... this is what they say.
God and your soul are older than Buddhism. Buddhism was written afterward, when the age of deafness began. It's still one of the better systems, IMO, if you can't hear your soul or God and need a system to establish some kind of communication.

Buddhism has all kinds of concepts of evil in it. What is practiced in the West is not the same as what is practiced in the East.

Which Buddhism? There are so many different schools that disagree on major points. The Truth disagrees with itself?

I think Zoroastrianism is older
 
Last edited:
Top