The SJW and equality movement

Those crafty law enforcement guys knew he was a spy all along so they choked the life out of him right there on a street just to make it seem like an excessive force situation against a person of color. Man, I'm a fool; couldn't see the next level stuff that was obvious.
 
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...llection-of-liars-over-riot-coverage-n2576070

AG Barr Rips National Media as a ‘Collection of Liars’ Over Riot Coverage
...​
"They're basically a collection of liars. Most of the mainstream media. They're a collection of liars and they know exactly what they're doing. A perfect example of that were the riots. Right on the street it was clear as day what was going on, anyone observing it, reporters observing it, it could not have escaped their attention that this was orchestrated violence by a hardened group of street fighting radicals and they kept on excluding from their coverage all the video of this and reporting otherwise and they were doing that for partisan reasons, and they were lying to the American people.​
...​
"The press has dropped, in my view - and I'm talking about the national mainstream media - has dropped any pretense of professional objectivity and are political actors, highly partisan who try to shape what they're reporting to achieve a political purpose and support a political narrative that has nothing to do with the truth. They're very mendacious about it," he continued. "It's very destructive to our Republic; it's very destructive to the Democratic system to have that, especially being so monolithic. It's contributing to a lot of the intensity and partisanship."​
...​
"It's funny that you had record numbers of police being injured during 'peaceful' protests," he said. "You know usually in protests, you have large numbers of injured rioters and a modest number of injured law enforcement. I'm talking about back in the 90s and 60s, 60s to the 90s, nowadays very few rioters get injured, very few and hundreds, even thousands of officers have been injured."​
...​
According to Barr, the organizing behind the rioting in cities across the country is under investigation and federal law enforcement agencies are working to identify the individuals behind the chaos.
"People are pouring through all of the video trying to identify people to hold people accountable," Barr said, adding that the funding of the riots is also under investigation.
 
That doesn't address my sentiment in any way, but in any event:

The university responded with this statement:

“Leslie Neal-Boylan’s employment at UMass Lowell ended on June 19, after she was informed she would no longer serve as dean of the Solomont School of Nursing. She had been in that role for 10 months. Although a tenured full faculty member, she declined to join the nursing faculty. As with all such employment decisions, it was made in the best interests of the university and its students. Although we are not able to discuss specifics of a personnel matter, it would be incorrect to assume any statement by Dr. Neal-Boylan was the cause of that decision.”​
 
Cancel Culture BACKFIRES On Antifa And BLM Leftists As Their Arrests Go Public, They Lose Their Jobs

When you get "canceled" for exercising your constitutional rights, that's cancel culture.

When you get fired because you were arrested for rioting, arson, assault, vandalism, or looting, it's not cancel culture, it's normal. Employers have a responsibility to protect their employees, their customers, and their property.
 
Last edited:
https://nypost.com/2020/09/17/princeton-faces-federal-probe-for-saying-racism-is-embedded-there/

Princeton faces federal probe for admitting racism remains ‘embedded’ there
Princeton University could be forced to pay back millions of dollars in federal funding — and also be fined — over its president’s recent admission that racism persists at the Ivy League institution.​
In a letter to Princeton President Christopher Eisgruber, the US Department of Education said it was opening an investigation into a Sept. 2 letter in which he outlined the school’s “efforts to combat systemic racism.”​
 
The civil war has started and it is deadly.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officers-killed-surge-28-year-point-civil/story?id=71773405
Police officers killed surge 28% this year and some point to civil unrest and those looking to exploit it​

The widows and family members of the police officers killed and injured since the riots started don't think it is a joke.

https://pjmedia.com/columns/tyler-o...nd-american-civil-war-already-started-n880940

Has the Second American Civil War Already Started?​
While many fear a civil war may be in America’s near future, in some senses, the civil war may have already begun. When South Carolina seceded from the Union in 1861 and officially kicked off the Civil War, Americans had already been fighting one another for years. The decade of the 1850s has a great deal to teach modern Americans about how a civil war happens.​
 
The civil war has started and it is deadly.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officers-killed-surge-28-year-point-civil/story?id=71773405
Police officers killed surge 28% this year and some point to civil unrest and those looking to exploit it​

The widows and family members of the police officers killed and injured since the riots started don't think it is a joke.
Jim, terms are important here. Also, I think the best idea is to pay careful attention to whence these talking points originate and who benefits from them. Here in South Africa, there was much civil war talk a few years back. It eventually emerged that the 'meme' emanated from a UK PR firm and was designed to deflect attention from a corrupt president.
A civil war is a high-intensity conflict, often involving regular armed forces, that is sustained, organized and large-scale. Civil wars may result in large numbers of casualties and the consumption of significant resources.[4]
SOURCE
 
Democrats are rioting and Democrat politicians give them tacit approval because the Democrats have very little political power and they are resorting to violence because they can't gain power through legal means.

The Democrat party has very little power within the Federal Government in Washington D.C. There is a Democrat majority in the House, but Republicans control the Senate and the Presidency and Trump is appointing more and more federal judges who will interpret the law as it was meant when enacted and not according to liberal ideology. And Democrats control fewer state governments than Republicans.

https://www.atr.org/map?amp

Republicans Have Full Control of 22 States, Democrats 15​
...​
Thursday, January 23rd, 2020, 2,00 PM​
Republicans have full control of the legislative and executive branch in 22 states.​
Democrats have full control of the legislative and executive branch in 15 states.​
Population of the 22 fully R-controlled states: 132,338,323​
Population of the 15 fully D-controlled states: 120,326,393​
Republicans have full control of the legislative branch in 30 states.​
Democrats have full control of the legislative branch in 19 states.​
Population of the 30 fully R-controlled states: 184,536,246​
Population of the 19 fully D-controlled states: 135,248,276​
 
Jim, terms are important here. Also, I think the best idea is to pay careful attention to whence these talking points originate and who benefits from them. Here in South Africa, there was much civil war talk a few years back. It eventually emerged that the 'meme' emanated from a UK PR firm and was designed to deflect attention from a corrupt president.
SOURCE
What country was your post about? South Africa or the US?
 
Top