The SJW and equality movement

Dear fellow citizens

In the wake of the horrifying and brutal killing of George Floyd, many in the UK expressed heartfelt solidarity; widespread protests showed a genuine commitment to opposing racism. Since then, however, activists, corporations and institutions seem to have seized the opportunity to exploit Floyd’s death to promote an ideological agenda that threatens to undermine British race relations.

The power of this ideology lies in the fear it inspires in those who would otherwise speak out, whatever their ethnicity. But speak out we must. We must oppose and expose the racial division being sown in the name of anti-racism.

The consequences of this toxic, racialised agenda are counter-productive and serious. We are all being divided by tactics and narratives many of us know to be untrue:

  • By splitting society into black lives or white lives, racial identity is being used to define who we all are and how we should fight injustice, as opposed to building a united movement to improve life for everyone.
  • Those who favour the identity-based politics of grievance and academic critical race theory are redefining racism. The achievements of civil rights movements in the past – that effected positive material impacts on the lives of ethnic minorities and increased equal treatment – are now being denied and undermined by those who claim racism is on the rise.
  • Demands that millions of people accept uncritically a prescriptive ‘white privilege’ agenda or be dubbed ignorant, racist or in denial is creating new tensions.
  • Under soulless acronyms such as BAME and POC, all ethnic minorities are robbed of individual agency, and assumed to be victims of injustice.
  • Free speech is being eroded by a McCarthyite culture of conformity in which to question the new dogma means to risk one’s livelihood and reputation.
  • Calls for the wholesale destruction of historical statues, symbols and works of art are fuelling an unhealthy war against the past and stirring up culture wars in the present.

  • An obsessive focus on the impact of colonialism threatens to turn history into a morality tale, rather than a complex, three-dimensional understanding of the past.
  • The common conflation of the issue of race in the US with the UK (in relation to criminal justice, for example) is unhelpful as it makes it difficult to discuss our specific historical circumstances and the contemporary challenges we face.

We are committed to supporting open-minded, fact-based investigation into the roots of our many social problems but reject simplistic explanations that reduce all injustice to racial factors.

We are dismayed at the moral cowardice of political and cultural institutions that refuse to speak out in defence of tolerant citizens who are being targeted as though their skin colour is synonymous with ‘unconscious’ bigotry.

We oppose the notion of collective guilt, and support the goals of those who have struggled to ensure that individuals are judged by the content of the character and not the colour of their skin.

We reject the proposition that the UK is inherently racist in 2020, with racial prejudice embedded into our educational, cultural and legal institutions. We salute the struggles of earlier generations of civil rights activists and the progress they made in defeating racist discrimination and attitudes.

We want a genuine movement to fight for equality of treatment. Where racism exists, it should be unapologetically challenged. We oppose those ideologues who seek to irrevocably damage our society by hijacking this important cause. We also oppose the opportunistic far right groups who are already exploiting this new climate of fear and disunity.

We will not be divided – by reactionary racists or culture warriors – who refuse to see us as individuals beyond our skin colour.


Janella Ajeigbe, headteacher

Katharine Birbalsingh, headteacher

Ben Cobley, author, The Tribe

William Clouston, party leader, The Social Democratic Party

Andrew Doyle, writer; comedian

Dr Rakib Ehsan, research fellow, HJS

Simon Evans, comedian

Dr Ashley Frawley, sociologist

Inaya Folerin-Iman, writer; free speech activist

Francis Foster, comedian

Claire Fox, director, Academy of Ideas

Tarjinder Gill, teacher; All In Britain

Manick Govinda, independent arts consultant

Ben Habib, businessman; co-founder, Unlocked; former MEP

Courtney Hamilton, writer

Ash Hirani, South East Hindu Association

Ed Husain, author The House of Islam: A Global History

Ike Ijeh, architect; writer

Christina Jordan, former MEP, South West England

Esther K, YouTuber; author, Graduating Into Adulthood

Lesley Katon, campaigner; creative & communications director

Ramsha Khan, student journalist

Vishal Khatri, aviation professional

Konstantin Kisin, comedian

Kulvinder Singh Manik, GP

Patsy Murrell, Project Manager

Mercy Muroki, political commentator; student

Masimba Musodza, writer

Sarah Peace, artist

Bhimji Pindoria, president, South East Hindu Association

Helen Pluckrose, editor-in-chief, Areo

Calvin Robinson, school leader; teacher

Dr Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, educator; writer

Elizabeth Smith, writer

Professor Doug Stokes, director, Centre for Advanced International Studies

Zuby, musician; rapper; podcast host; author
This one is for @malf .

Richard Dawkins (who has been deplatformed in the past), was recently univited to an event held by Trinity College Dublin’s College Historical Society, because he might make students uncomfortable.

The society’s auditor, Brid O’Donnell was shocked to discover that Dawkins' Wikipedia page did not contain all of the dirt on the militant atheist and author of “The Selfish Gene”.

According to the Times, O’Donnell’s post explained that her predecessor had invited Dawkins and “I followed up the invitation with limited knowledge” of the scientist’s views, which were not fully fleshed out on “his Wikipedia page.” He was supposed to speak early next year.
Last edited:
"If you are liberal and can't stand Trump and can't possibly fathom why anyone would want to vote for him, let me fill you in. We can't stand you. You've done everything in your power to try and destroy this country by tearing down our police, our borders, our history. Systematically destroying our schools, and brainwashing our kids into thinking that socialism is the answer to everything. Demonizing religion and faith and glorifying abortion, violence, and thug culture. From calling us racist for expecting everyone of every color to follow our laws, to ridiculing us for having the audacity to wish someone a merry Christmas, or hang a flag on the fourth of july, or stand for our national anthem, or oh the horror wear a mega hat out in public. So much for your tolerance. We are voting for Trump not because he's the most charming character on the block, but because we vote policy over personality. And we are sick and tired of your divisive and destructive and ignorant and intolerant behavior and beliefs parading around as some kind of wokeness. We are voting for Trump because of you."