Trump Consciousness

The violence will blow over pretty quickly... As long as you take the vaccine and trade in your dollars for the new crypto bucks and don’t say anything controversial on social media you’ll be fine.

Maybe put up two flags to ensure your safety: the Stars and Stripes as well as a rainbow flag with the alphabet.
I'm guessing the rainbow flag with the alphabet is what you think a Leftist flag would look like.

I don't think you understand how this works. Trying to play both sides marks you as a traitor, regardless.

But it's okay, I figured it out. The stars and stripes signals I'm innocuous to the right wing extremists. And if Antifa shows up, they'll be busy attacking all my neighbors with the giant Trump/Confederate flags anyways.
 
The violence will blow over pretty quickly... As long as you take the vaccine and trade in your dollars for the new crypto bucks and don’t say anything controversial on social media you’ll be fine.

Maybe put up two flags to ensure your safety: the Stars and Stripes as well as a rainbow flag with the alphabet.
I'm guessing the rainbow flag with the alphabet is what you think a Leftist flag would look like.

I don't think you understand how this works. Trying to play both sides marks you as a traitor, regardless.

But it's okay, I figured it out. The stars and stripes signals I'm innocuous to the right wing extremists. And if Antifa shows up, they'll be busy attacking all my neighbors with the giant Trump/Confederate flags anyways.
Look like Russia in 1917 - 1922 (the Civil War time), when the political control over some unlucky town may have changed several times a year (in some cases, several times a month), being accompanied with mass beatings (at best) or mass shootings (at worst) each time the local power was taken by yet another of numerous warring factions.

As it was said in a popular Russian movie about this epoch, "When Reds come, they pillage. When Whites come, they pillage. So where can a poor peasant go?!"
 
Says the self appointed constitutional scholar who's accusing dozens of judges (many appointed by Trump) of constitutional fraud.
Strawman. That is not my accusation at all. That would imply that the case was over ruled on the merits, which it wasn't. As well we would be talking abut seven judges in your strawman argument.
 
Last edited:
Today i was listening to BBC radio. I think it was BBC 5 Live which was playing on BFBS 2 which is a British Forces radio station. Anyway there was this guy who from what i gathered was an ex FBI dude who must have been pretty high ranked. When i tuned in they where talking about 'truth' and how it can be subjective, objective etc. All good so far. Then he went on to say that the storming of the Capitol building needed to be investigated, as in how were demonstrators so easily allowed in etc. Again made sense. Personally my assessment and gut would be saying that yes Trump wanted his supporters making a lot of noise outside the building while things where being debated and voted on inside but it was the Biden camp that let them in as well as sending instigators down there to rile people up. Anyway so the way this guy is talking obviously i could tell he was pro Biden and co but he seemed to be talking quite logically. Just before the dumbest thing i think any investigator could say he says 'for example if i'm sitting in a room and i tell you it is raining, obviously it's not, so that is a blatant lie*'. So i'm thinking ok you could argue that someone got the word rain confused with heavy humidity (esp if english wasnt their first language) or was said in a way/tone that that the word rain is used but heavy humidity is meant etc. Basically though i got his point, fair enough. He then said 'A truth that we must never surrender is that Joe Biden won the election*' ..... Lets all put our political views, wishes etc aside.. take a deep breath.. now lets think. A 150 odd million votes have been collected and tallied, a large percentage from mail-in ballots. A HUGE logistical operation if there ever was one with large numbers of individuals involved in that operation whether in the postal service, vote counting at numerous tallying centers spanning half a contintent and beyond, not to mention that the vote counting was done by machines (crazy idea if you ask me) which i dont know if are connected to the internet but definately have software. From the minute you have software that opens up the possibility to hacks, software backdoors etc, etc. Even after YEARS of investigation any good investigator (remember he is an investigator not a emotional political supporter) would have to concede that there could be something that hasn't come to light or that has been hidden or covered up, particularly in such a massive logistical operation than involves software on top of that. 'A truth that we must never surrender is that Joe Biden won the election*' WOW is all i can say. If that is the attitude, how can anyone trust that the election has or will ever be investigated properly (or anything else for that matter)?

*the two quotes mentioned may be very slightly out as in the odd adverb or something but potray exactly what he said
I should point out in case anyone hasnt cottoned on yet but you can NEVER trust the BBC, not the way it is at the moment at least
 
Top