I'm glad you denounced Aleistar Crowley in the interview.
I agree with your assessment that "
By their fruit you will recognize them. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?"
The old canard that "Yes, Crowley was a sociopath, but had a few good insights" does not fly. It's true that Crowley ran across a few unique insights, but
en toto his philosophy is poison.
Crowley is always presented backwards by his promoters "Yes, he had a few flaws, but his philosophy offers brilliant revelations!"
Funny thing is, Tsarion employs the same tactic as Crowley: ...florid, voluminous word-salad that sounds great in the moment, but contradicts itself five minutes later without apology.
https://unslaved.com/?s=crowley