women are "never straight"

More sexist crap that say women are lying about their sexuality. This "study" has been done before. They have said women react with arousal to images of animals having sex. Guess we are all secretly into bestiality as well? They came up with theories that women "lubricate" at images of sex in anticipation of less harm through rape, and on and on.

The thing is that you can't measure a woman's arousal the same way you can measure a man's (erection.)

In other words, the Men of Science (and it is mostly men, come on) have not figured out the "science" of women's arousal because it is more complicated than men's.

So yes, I call bullshit on this study and all the ones that came before it.

Sad to see skeptics accept this.
 
More sexist crap that say women are lying about their sexuality. This "study" has been done before. They have said women react with arousal to images of animals having sex. Guess we are all secretly into bestiality as well? They came up with theories that women "lubricate" at images of sex in anticipation of less harm through rape, and on and on.

The thing is that you can't measure a woman's arousal the same way you can measure a man's (erection.)

In other words, the Men of Science (and it is mostly men, come on) have not figured out the "science" of women's arousal because it is more complicated than men's.

So yes, I call bullshit on this study and all the ones that came before it.

Sad to see skeptics accept this.

The arousal for females is the same as for males, but with the exception of the wining and dining that chicks require.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tim
More sexist crap that say women are lying about their sexuality. This "study" has been done before. They have said women react with arousal to images of animals having sex. Guess we are all secretly into bestiality as well? They came up with theories that women "lubricate" at images of sex in anticipation of less harm through rape, and on and on.

The thing is that you can't measure a woman's arousal the same way you can measure a man's (erection.)

In other words, the Men of Science (and it is mostly men, come on) have not figured out the "science" of women's arousal because it is more complicated than men's.

So yes, I call bullshit on this study and all the ones that came before it.

Sad to see skeptics accept this.
It would be kind of funny if it weren't so tragic. Men still can't figure out women (they could start with the fact that one woman /= all women) so they continually oversimplify. Just like how women "don't ever like to watch porn" or "always like six pack abs" or "all women want to trap men with babies and get married and no men actually want babies or marriage".

This study is the same kind of over interpretation applied to a lot of "pop science". Just like the Oreos are more addictive than cocaine BS.
 
Some of you are posting conclusions that suggest you've read the original study. I haven't been able to track it down yet. Can you please post the link?

If not, how are you reaching such strong conclusions about this study?

Dr. Rieger seems to have been researching this for quite awhile. Here's a study from 2004: "
A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal"

Sexual arousal is category-specific in men; heterosexual men are more aroused by female than by male sexual stimuli, whereas homosexual men show the opposite pattern. There is reason to believe that female sexual arousal is organized differently. We assessed genital and subjective sexual arousal to male and female sexual stimuli in women, men, and postoperative male-to-female transsexuals. In contrast to men, women showed little category specificity on either the genital or the subjective measure. Both heterosexual and homosexual women experienced strong genital arousal to both male and female sexual stimuli. Transsexuals showed a category-specific pattern, demonstrating that category specificity can be detected in the neovagina using a photoplethysmographic measure of female genital sexual arousal. In a second study, we showed that our results for females are unlikely to be explained by ascertainment biases. These findings suggest that sexual arousal patterns play fundamentally different roles in male and female sexuality.

There are 4 authors by the way: 2 male, 2 female.

They appear to have measured both objectively (genital) and subjectively, with the physiological responses matching the subjective. I haven't read the full study though.
 
Nice :|
I see you like to troll Yahoo answers too, eh?

That is unfortunately not my work. I discovered that masterpiece a few years back somehow. I wish I could take credit for it. It's one of the funniest things I've ever read.

"She said she totally agreed that she should have been spanked, and I was right in giving her a spanking... I should have taken her into my den..." :D
 
Men do know about the female orgasm though. Like many psychoactive drug-induced states, orgasms can be mapped (by the ladies) utilizing an ADSR envolope. Everything is a wave.
 
Some of you are posting conclusions that suggest you've read the original study. I haven't been able to track it down yet. Can you please post the link?

If not, how are you reaching such strong conclusions about this study?

Dr. Rieger seems to have been researching this for quite awhile. Here's a study from 2004: "
A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal"



There are 4 authors by the way: 2 male, 2 female.

They appear to have measured both objectively (genital) and subjectively, with the physiological responses matching the subjective. I haven't read the full study though.

You're gay.
 
Some of you are posting conclusions that suggest you've read the original study. I haven't been able to track it down yet. Can you please post the link?

If not, how are you reaching such strong conclusions about this study?

Dr. Rieger seems to have been researching this for quite awhile. Here's a study from 2004: "
A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal"



There are 4 authors by the way: 2 male, 2 female.

They appear to have measured both objectively (genital) and subjectively, with the physiological responses matching the subjective. I haven't read the full study though.

Right....yeah...measured, yeah...conclusions ... Arouet, please
 
Back
Top