iPsoFacTo
New
Lol no, how could you be nostalgic for the Bush family, Clinton or Obama? We get it, you think social issues are more important than perpetual imperialist wars.
bzzzzzzzzz. wrong answer
Lol no, how could you be nostalgic for the Bush family, Clinton or Obama? We get it, you think social issues are more important than perpetual imperialist wars.
bzzzzzzzzz. wrong answer
Is it more about mental and emotional stability?
It was a takeoff on the Bush 'miss me yet' thing of some years back
This is still ridiculous, Bush was a war monger.
bzzzzzzzzz. wrong answer
This is exactly the problem with divisive politics and SJW's. If it's not the answer you agree with then it must be wrong.
Thank you for making this so very clear.
and 'perpetual imperialistic wars' as a response to the post makes any sense?
And yes, Trump is totally deranged. His supporters can rationalize all they want but he's off his rocker in all manner of ways
How original. *yawn*
I get it, you're a Trump supporter
I do not like Trump as a person. He is a narcissist, like Hillary.
He was democratically elected, and that is all there is left to say.
Deal with it.
I do not like Trump as a person. He is a narcissist, like Hillary.
He was democratically elected, and that is all there is left to say.
Deal with it.
In the spirit of generosity I'm gong to assume your comment isn't just childish petulance by asking what you mean by 'deal with it'?
I'm saying I'm tired of hearing hysterical negativity about Trump. We live in a democracy and we will not always get the person we want. It is what it is.
I see the petulance coming from those who not only can't accept the election results, but are becoming more prone to masked violence, and preventing dialogue of any kind with those that have differing viewpoints.
My opinion of Trump is irrelevant.
In a little-noticed joint letter released last week, the NAACP, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, OCA (formerly known as the Organization for Chinese Americans), the National Urban League, and other civil rights organizations sharply criticized the “jurisdictional and classification problems that plagued the last FCC” — a reference to the legal mechanism used by the Obama administration to accomplish net neutrality.
Instead of classifying broadband as a public utility, the letter states, open internet rules should be written by statute. What does that mean? It means the Republican-led Congress should take control of the process — the precise approach that is favored by industry.
None of the civil rights groups that signed the joint letter responded to a request for comment.
It’s not the first time civil rights group have engaged in lobbying debates seemingly unrelated to their core missions, but in favor of their corporate donors. At a time when OCA received major funding from Southwest Airlines, the group filed a regulatory letter on behalf of the airline in support of Southwest’s bid to open flights at Houston airport. The NAACP, after receiving financial backing from Wal-Mart, helped the retail chain during its contentious bid to open stores in New York City.
OK... But surely none of us want a democracy where the minority* has to remain silent? Telling someone to just "deal with it" appears to shut down the dialogue to which you refer. In a free society one can "accept a result' whilst simultaneously critiquing and satirising the victor.
in this case, losing majority ;)
So Flynn resigned over Russian connections?
=-=-=
Perhaps Trump, "conservatives", and "liberals" may yet find common ground:
Civil Rights Groups, Funded by Telecoms, Back Donald Trump’s Plan to Kill Net Neutrality