whitehouseufo
New
Great interview. Would love to have seen some discussion of the possibility that Mishlove was the reincarnation of William James. which was presented to him by Walter Semkiw, ,and the work they did to check out the claim.
That would be interesting, I've not investigated that possibility. However personally I have my doubts about some of Semkiw's work, I suspect he has made some erroneous (mis-)identifications.Great interview. Would love to have seen some discussion of the possibility that Mishlove was the reincarnation of William James. which was presented to him by Walter Semkiw, ,and the work they did to check out the claim.
The UFO thing might be a a way of putting his intentions into the hands of higher beings (rather than himself), which might increase the effectiveness of his intentions.thx Larry very much agree with all of this. still not sure what to make of the UFO connection/ambassador.
Are you saying the "ufo thing" is a product of his individual consciousness or are the aliens discreet individual beings. In either case how would this increase the effectiveness of his intentions.The UFO thing might be a a way of putting his intentions into the hands of higher beings (rather than himself), which might increase the effectiveness of his intentions.
That would be interesting, I've not investigated that possibility. However personally I have my doubts about some of Semkiw's work, I suspect he has made some erroneous (mis-)identifications.
I'm not sure about Owen, of course, but I am convinced that when we want or need something it's likely always more apt to happen when "handed over to God" or a higher power outside ourselves . . . whether a prayer for something or with things like quiting alcohol (as AA admonishes). It seems that equally if not more important with the request part of prayer is the letting go part. Handing it over to a higher power allows for letting go more easily. It just occurred to me that in his case the alien thing might serve a similar function.Are you saying the "ufo thing" is a product of his individual consciousness or are the aliens discreet individual beings. In either case how would this increase the effectiveness of his intentions.
I did say that I hadn't investigated that particular case.The story has little to do with Semkiw and people's opinions of him. Has to do with the investigation Semkiw and Mishlove did investigating the possibility and how Mishlove's relatives and friends were checked.. For example type in www.williamjames.com to see who owns it.
Are you saying the "ufo thing" is a product of his individual consciousness or are the aliens discreet individual beings.
Are you saying the "ufo thing" is a product of his individual consciousness or are the aliens discreet individual beings.
I don't think it's so much technology that is at the root of materialism, as the simple fact that our perception is what lends an apparent concreteness to at least the part of reality most people are commonly aware of. Of course, it's true enough that as technology improved, and seemed to verify a lot of our understanding of the world in concrete terms, the illusion of an apparent material reality became stronger and stronger.
That said, and beyond technology, as scientific theory progressed, things became just as prone to woo as they ever were in the past. A simple fact: no one knows what matter and energy actually are. Most physicists offer some kind of model based on them, and their essential equivalence. Upon this, the immense edifice of materialistic science is based. Because the models to some extent work, as exemplified by technology, then the inference is that they must be literally real, or at least that they are our best current understanding of something that is literally real.
We can't escape the undeniable perception of concreteness that our senses provide us with. We're constituted that way; but perhaps Samuel Johnson's kicking of a stone didn't refute immaterialism, so much as demonstrated how compelling the illusion of material reality is. I think it was possible to go along with this until the advent of quantum mechanics, when all of a sudden things seemed to become much less concrete; science arrived at a place of "no-thing-ness", to which it reacted with attempts to "re-thing" them, whilst at the same time rather revelling in the new found ability to speculate using mathematical constructs. I mean, if something as weird as QM could exist, why not things as weird as black holes, not to mention the big bang and inflation?
Lo! Science has declared the universe is 13 billion years old, and most of us have swallowed it because we don't possess the mathematical chops to question it. However, could be there's as much evidence for such things as that the moon is made of green cheese. Most "evidence" is extrapolated from from theory, and when empirical data refutes it, the response is to either ignore it or complexify theory well beyond its capacity to describe reality.
A large amount of time in the 20th and 21st century has been spent by scientists gambolling about like lambs in fields of speculation created by themselves -- because it's sheer fun, and enables them to feel intellectually superior to non-scientists.
Why on earth would we need consensus if so many scientific hypotheses were true? Why would we need to make heretics of people with differing opinions (indeed, why would there be such opinions in the first place)? After all, it's in these opinions that the future breakthroughs in science are likely to originate. Why subject ourselves to more inertia in the system than is necessary? The answer, at least in part, may be that scientists are enjoying their little selves and it would be a shame to interrupt their interminable peregrinations. Besides, we can ourselves borrow from their authority and join in all the fun.
I watched this a while ago... good stuff... but kinda buries the lead -- Ted Owens made UFO appear at will, and directed lightning with his finger!I've just stumbled on this video, which seems relevant to the PK man issue:
This intrigues me.....I am not at all into UFOs hence definitely not an expert but recently I came across a tweet about this man who allegedly can summon UFOs, too:I watched this a while ago... good stuff... but kinda buries the lead -- Ted Owens made UFO appear at will, and directed lightning with his finger!
haha... yeah it's strange. I don't totally understand how people can fall into these political sinkholes.Love Mishlove, in fact I miss Mishlove. I guess we conservatives are too evil to hang out with him though. He is like an all-seeing-eye with no personal backbone. Wonder how he's feeling about discriminating politically in the light of the coercive darkness his side has brought to this world recently. Ala mandates, fake medicine, censorship, and yes racism.
Wasn't it racism you mentioned in your farewell address to us? Been to any school board meetings lately?
Its tribalism at its worst. Unless we can agree on basics like, consent, dignity, and property rights, we fall ingloriously. Thanks for fanning the flames (and caving to the cocktail party pressure) Jeff.haha... yeah it's strange. I don't totally understand how people can fall into these political sinkholes.