What is becoming increasingly likely -- At least two presidents were closely associated with Epstein. Both swear they haven't heard from him in years. Trump says he had a falling out and even kicked Epstein out of Mar Lago. Here's the point that isn't brought up by Trump supporters. Epstein rapes a 14-year-old at Trump's hotel and Trump does NOT call the cops. Think about that again. That is what a close associate would do (and/or someone compromised). Moving on. Both Clinton and Trump have handfuls of rape, sexual assault, and statutory accusations and charges against them. Many of these victims are quite credible. Trump has a couple of accusations with Epstein in the vicinity. Unsure of Clinton. But nothing yet that would get them embroiled in the Epstein investigation.
The intelligence-linked angle is interesting. We have been told that when Acosta interviewed for a job in the Trump admin, he was asked about the sweetheart deal with Epstein, and said that it was because he was told Epstein was intelligence. Do we have definitive proof he said that? People like to throw around Israeli intelligence links as well, but I would be willing to wager that a lot of rich Jewish American men that vocally support Israeli & American foreign policy have such links. It doesn't necessarily mean he was intelligence. Good hypothesis supporting intelligence angle here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1148303671857491968.html
And here is the hedge funders take on Epstein (this one has made the rounds so you may have read it):
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019...-some-thoughts-on-what-epstein-was-doing.html
What the media isn't focusing so much is on the recruitment process for the women and girls. It has mostly been glossed over or taken at face value. If all it is, is some kind of trick to get young women to believe they will be modeling for the big time, then the stories of Westall and other people that ONLY (or at least firstly) look through a conspiracy lens, fall flat. Of course what conspiracy culture also doesn't like to bring up is that Epstein is not a pedophile. Pedophiles are people who rape pre-pubescent children. I have seen no such credible accusations of pedophilia in this case. The reason that this is important is that all too many "researchers" who speak of the "satanic pedophile rings" are clapping their hands and taking a bow that the revelations of Epstein's behavior is proof these things exist. They aren't showing this. Not even close.
Some also focus on linking Epstein to the Nexim cult and Democratic Party because many of the leaders gave money to Hillary Clinton. What they fail to mention is that the Nexim Cult gave much more money to New York State republicans. Sounds like a cult trying to legitimize itself using the game of politics. Once again, no proof of actual pedophiles in this cult either, yet conspiracy people like Westall (and Opperman) try to link it with the giant pedophile satanist rings. But I am off the frontage road and need to get back on track.
Some are also now trying to tie Pizzagate and Q-Anon as psyops and covers for the Epstein thing. This I find more credible but until the identities of Q-Anon are discovered no one will be satisfied with this theory. The theory is that Pizzagate was created to discredit
#OpDeathEaters (look them up if you don't know who they are -- they were Anonymous linked geeks that were partly trying to raise awareness of Epstein's behavior), while QAnon was created to discredit and take attention away from
#Anonymous. Various hackers say they know that both were creations of prominent Trump supporters and backed by the state (but I have not seen definitive proof). It is an interesting theory and seems somewhat plausible (it also served the purpose of being a recruitment tool to rile certain demographics up with Pizzagate, get them in the Republican Party, and then pacify them w/ some Q-Anon opium). Link to pizzagate & Qanon theory here --
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1149045274938994688.html
Another interesting addition. Recently, factually accurate articles have been making the rounds about how child trafficking prosecutions under Trump have gone DOWN and not UP, as so many are claiming and screaming about. In fact, the numbers show Obama doing a better job with prosecutions than Trump. But when looking at these numbers, be careful to keep the data sets consistent and to watch out for hoaxes. Ben Shapiro was recently caught using different data sets for Obama than Trump and this was pointed out to show the exact opposite of his claims. He quietly moved on.
Good twitter feed between Will, myself, and a Q-Anon supporter with links to the stats of prosecutions going down -
Will Merthon is a journalist who has been covering these stories and Q-Anon and should be sought out to get the facts straight. For instance, remember those 60,000 sealed indictment claims that are still making the rounds? Yeah, he investigated that and showed it for what it was. 100% bullshit. This link is perfect in showing how a conspiracy story gets out of control. I mean, it is absolutely perfect and deserves to win an award --
https://wmerthon6.wixsite.com/website-1/home/who-started-the-60k-sealed-indictment-claim
My latest thoughts. Sorry for the ramble. Hope this provides some food for thought.