However, you may give up on Eric concerning this issue, immediately - he is absolutely adamant in his rejection of the heterodox account and analysis of this event. No amount of evidence will be enough for him, and no number of arguments will dissuade him.
Well, so be it - it just means that his Will is such, while mine, and yours, are otherwise. You and me are also adamant on certain issues, aren't we? This won't change, and should simply be accepted.
Yes, Vortex, I tend to agree. Maybe I should simply have kept my ‘feelings’ around 9/11 to myself, but as it is such an important event and I can’t help my deeply held sense that their is something smelly about the official narrative, that I have to let people know where I stand when the topic is brought up.
As for being adamant about certain issues. With the Covid event and 9/11 I would say I’m adamant that I can’t believe the official line, but not
adamant about very much more except certain personal things. For example that I would say there is definitely a real unwillingness to even question the vaccine as a possible cause of injuries with a lot more than just a few people, I know this from personal experience from family and close friends and others. My aunt and uncle have both developed problems, one heart related and the other can no longer read as she has some undiagnosed eye problem, both developed soon after having the jab. My Mum says both become highly animated if the vaccine question is even asked. That’s not rational Imo.
Something else that’s not rational is the way that certain words and events have become equally ‘unquestionable’, with people immediately jumping to conclusions and becoming angry or extremely defensive. Anti-semitism & the Holocaust are two such examples - this is not rational either. I think that we have been ‘trained‘ or conditioned to think (or not think!) a certain way when we hear these words.
In all three examples I think this has been achieved quite deliberately, through media and TV & films over decades of propaganda. All three have developed a sort of ‘religious‘ vibe, the sort that religious fanatics give out, where certain things are beyond questioning. The motivation behind these three examples differ. The vaccine case I think has been government driven at first, ending up largely driven by pharmaceutical companies advertising budgets. It has been extremely effective.
The latter two are much more complicated, but have been deliberately manufactured mainly by zionists, (Eric‘s eyes roll upward) possibly helped by others who found it in their interest to do so for various reasons. The complicated part is common to both anti-semitism/Holocaust and the so called vaccines. I generally see people on the left (in the Uk) as being most likely to fall for this propaganda trick. They like to see themselves as being the ‘good guys’ - and they often are! With many people in the medical profession being on the left side of politics, definitely nurses, most lawyers willing to work pro-bono are likely to vote Labour ( or were until recently). And of course many others in all lines of work.
They somehow lap up the media idea that vaccines are ‘necessary, safe & effective’ and rarely question the very deliberate rubbishing of Jeremy Corbyn as being an ‘anti-Semite‘ by the mainstream media, which helped to keep him from becoming PM (though he had other fatal flaws imo). Many Jews are currently being kicked out of the Labour Party because of the weaponising of the term ‘anti-semite’ - madness! And as for the holy Holocaust. I can never see any of my own family even beginning to question anything about that - it has definitely taken on a most divine aura. And it surely
was something evil, a visit to the Holocaust area in London’s Imperial War Museum is surely enough to show us that. The tears that I cried there were not crocodile ones.
But was it really more evil than many other wartime events? And what about the other genocides of the 20th century? Mao, Stalin, The Congo? We rarely hear about them, most people know exactly the number associated with ‘the Holocaust’ but I bet a tiny fraction of us know the other numbers. (I just looked them up). Does no-one ask why this may be? It’s because the media is controlled by Jews, or people liable to be sympathetic to their ‘special case‘. Jews have the protection and the self-guilt of many by being constantly portrayed as victims, this is played on by the manipulators. Yet these same Jews are known for being highly successful, in spite of the odds being against them. Very many powerful areas of banking and business and other key, influential fields are frequently Jewish run.
Some may read this and be horrified by my ideas, and automatically label me as…guess what?
I think it’s high time we put a stop to this self censorship, which I think is often caused by subconscious programming and ‘guilt‘. I am a great fan of many, many Jews. People like Miko Peled, Norman Finkelstein, Miriam Margoyles, Bret Weinstein, Richard Feynman, Einstein etc,etc. The list is endless. If my all-round thinking around Jews makes me an anti-Semite in someone’s eyes then I can’t change that. What I find most frustrating is that with the few Jews I know personally, I am too afraid to talk to them about any of this as I think they may well become offended and any chance of hearing their opinions, and possibly changing mine, would end up lost, as well as the friendship. It’s the same thing when attempting to talk about vaccines with many other friends and acquaintances.
I never intended to write all that, but there it is. As for the rest of your post, I feel kind of sad about it in one way, but in another I tend to believe it’s all meant to be. Like Eric I do favour the idea of us as being much greater than it appears, when I get annoyed at people's posts I tend to think of their souls and the bigger picture.
If it was all hunky dory, friendly and ‘nice’ - our life would surely be less than it is, the highs and the lows go to making it as rich and colourful as possible - and if I could change it - I probably wouldn’t.