I am not interested in religion as a practice; there is no reason why I would not be interested in what is basically a sociohistorical hypothesis. Also, I am not a skeptic, so the paranormal aspects of each credo still interest me; there is a parallel between levitating christian saints and levitating eastern monks... Which implies that similar results can be achieved by reaching an altered state, independent of dogmatic considerations. That, to me, lends more credibility to these macro manifestations of psi. In other words, a lack of interest in the tedium does not mean that I will avoid all threads that touch on the subject by default... Just don't expect me to defend their tenets.
And my complaint is that he is spamming tables for the sake of doing so, turning what began as an interesting premise into a convoluted mess just because he can't bother to debate properly. Can't he respond to the rebuttals?