Michael Larkin
Member
Many people don't get all their news from extremely biased websites. People such as farmers, outdoorsmen, gardeners, travelers, etc. can see the effects of global warming in their everyday lives. They see extreme weather becoming more common. They see droughts. They see all the glaciers melting. They are outdoors, seeing and observing. Their views matter too. So yes, I think these polls are relevant to the debate if you think, like you seem to do, that professional science is hopelessly corrupt and cannot be trusted.
Oh, dear. Appeals to emotion with no empirical evidence. Get thee hence to a sceptic blog or two, or if you can't face the cognitive dissonance, try out Judith Curry's moderate lukewarmer blog. The so-called skeptical science blog will deprive you of all your powers of discernment and capacity to think independently of Newspeak. I've been there and to other warmist blogs frequently, by the way. Trouble is, you only get the view from the one side. On truly sceptical blogs, you get both.