Doubts about the moon landings

And second, The 2 stick method? Seriously? Yea that’s totally conclusive. Duh!
It is a brilliant experiment. It elegant simplicity is what makes it genius.
And you can repeat fairly easy, a lot easier than 2300 yrs ago, so why don't you?

Unless of course you factor in the fact the sun is no where near 93 million miles away in which case a small localized sun would have the same exact effect there Copernicus Jr.
The sun is very big and very far, otherwise the angular size of the sun would change in size between sunrise and sunset size depending where you live.
I don't know how flat earthers suppose the sun moves over the "disk", but however they propose it is moving, it is going to conflict with the observations from the two stick experiment.
How does the sun move according to your version of the flat earth?
Is it not so that there are different flavors of flat eartherism?, which one do you adhere to?





What the sun actually looks like 100% verifiable by thousands of people with Nikon P-900 and P-1000 cameras, ON YOUTUBE & definitely NOT 93 million miles away.

What Nasa’s overpaid CGI artists wants you to think the sun look like.

Again REAL footage by consumers on a budget vs bullshit CGI images on a 25 billion tax payer dollars annual budget spent on lying to all of you. Apparently it’s working
fan-fucking-tastickly, you all are thoroughly brainwashed that’s for damn sure.
[/QUOTE]
What do you think these pics show? And more importantly, what do they have to do with anything?
 
With a flat earth, how does one explain the Coriolis force? Note: you can't demonstrate the force just by observing water draining in your sink or toilet -- that's influenced by various factors. First, you have to eliminate those factors, as the following video shows:

 
With a flat earth, how does one explain the Coriolis force? Note: you can't demonstrate the force just by observing water draining in your sink or toilet -- that's influenced by various factors. First, you have to eliminate those factors, as the following video shows:


Also explain general atmospheric circulation like trade winds, tropical revolving storms, water currents flowing from hot to cold and visa versa, seasons, differing climates, the moonson etc, on a flat earth.
 
As more and more civilians, and people in general begin to go up into space, the flat earthers are going to have a harder and harder time maintaining their conspiracy. This conspiracy already includes all people of all nations that have been into space. And the people who provide them with support back on the ground. As well as any people privy to satellite images of the planet. Yet not one confession. Not one person revealing what would be the biggest kept secret of all time. Not even on a death bed. Imagine if you knew this secret. Boy, the urge to get it out would be incredible.

Travel into space will become common within the next 30-60 years. Eventually everybody will know that the earth is round. Flat Earth theory will be forgotten completely.
 
Last edited:
It is a brilliant experiment. It elegant simplicity is what makes it genius.
It’s not brilliant it’s stupid and flawed and I already explained why.

You want conclusive proof the earth doesn’t curve? How about lasers not stupid stick shadows. No wonder you people still think it’s round.


You can skip straight to the 53 minute mark if you wanna trim the fat and get straight to the longest proof which was 20 miles of water laser confirmed FLAT & LEVEL within .2 meters.

Believe it don’t believe it whatever, like I said I’m NOT wrong. And we actually have PROOF over here in the “ FE Cult” lmao
 
With a flat earth, how does one explain the Coriolis force? Note: you can't demonstrate the force just by observing water draining in your sink or toilet -- that's influenced by various factors. First, you have to eliminate those factors, as the following video shows:

Nobody cares about the fictional coriolis is how one explains it mostly. But a good place to start would be how Wikipedia describes it,

“ These additional forces are termed inertial forces, fictitious forces or pseudo forces”
hint:
fictitious ~
adjective
UK /fɪkˈtɪʃ.əs/ US /fɪkˈtɪʃ.əs/
invented and not true or not existing:

pseudo soo͞′dō►
adj. False or counterfeit; fake.
n. An intellectually pretentious person; a pseudointellectual.
n. A poseur; one who is fake.

Seems legit
 
Flat or bump?
oh there’s definitely a bump in big Mike’s crotch region, unlike the earth he/shes groin is NOT flat.
I’ve unfortunately seen video of it dancing on some morning talk show and there was 2 visible testicles outlines slapping the front of big Mike’s skirt/dress thing

89B273D7-E9E7-4BD2-A878-5EBD398DC635.jpegD06C6B70-E184-4C3F-99A0-EC86253CC20B.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Also explain general atmospheric circulation like trade winds, tropical revolving storms, water currents flowing from hot to cold and visa versa, seasons, differing climates, the moonson etc, on a flat earth.
No thanks that shits all nonsense and rubbish none of it really matters considering she’s visibly, demonstrably and provably FLAT, sounds like a good project for someone of your intellect though. I do know tides have nothing to do with the moon since gravity doesn’t exist, hope that helps.
 
Travel into space will become common within the next 30-60 years. Eventually everybody will know that the earth is round. Flat Earth theory will be forgotten completely

You people ever get tired of being wrong when you come off so condescending to begin with? You must enjoy crow huh?
So you got any actual proof of earths curvature?

No? M’kay well feel free to watch the laser test I posted for Bart. I don’t think your non existent argument is sufficient for a repost of it.
 
Back
Top