Search results

Dear I need to be quick, I don't have time for now. I reviewed this thread: https://skeptiko-forum.com/threads/sorry-i-come-to-whine-again.3638/ My idea is not originated by the nde mentioned there, but might be more or less influenced. Not to brag, I feel my idea was generated by my proud...

Exactly I should have used "time line" instead of "RRH" because, in my limited English language recognition, "time line" is more close to English native speakers' habit. But there is one serious problem, I think people often mingle(your writing taught me maybe to use word conflate is better) two...

One key gist of my hypothetical model is: the Creator created the "warehouse" and the "RRH"s separately, and our "self" doesn't come into existence immediately after the construction of warehouse being done, it is the activity of Creator letting one RRH passing through the warehouse and bumping...

Absolutely fine! If you didn't mean that my idea of "warehouse" is a human's memories, then it's great! That's correct you totally understand me. And sorry that I misunderstood your calling "warehouse" as a "memory". Also thank you for the extended material link to read! I exactly mean the...

Absolutely not. Completely not like this. I didn't mean any correlation for the "warehouse" with our human's memory. I'm a bit frustrated that I completely failed in making anyone understand what I mean. Of course it is my fault. Forget it. Later if I could have time and find a means I will...

Sigh, I haven't successfully got your understanding me. But it doesn't matter, I will continue trying to explain. I know it's very easy for me to get people understand my notion of that warehouse, since it is relevant to notion of parallel universe which people are familiar with. But I never...

Glad to see that discussion, any extension discussion welcomed. Lest that I've never succeeded in getting anyone understand my meaning, may I ask J Randall Murphy, what does this English word "offshoot" mean in English language, and what its meaning you were referring to in your previous post...

I haven't talked anything about the possibility or impossibility of the afterlife, but if I could eventually finish writing my idea about the question what is our "self", soon or later it will cover the afterlife topic and what will it mean in my model of hypothesis. Now is not the time. I've...

I will explain my meaning from another angle of viewing partially for converging with the ideas in above paragraph written by J Randall Murphy. I meticulously considered whether this post of mine should be applying a "quoting reply function" to J Randall Murphy's original paragraph, I think...

One very important thing I don't know how to explain. I'm very sorry since I didn't make this meaning of mine clearly, covering my face, bitter smile. I did express the meaning that the information of our past really is stored, stored forever. But I explicitly wished to express that, those past...

I also agree with you, dear @J Randall Murphy, on that what I said are all my postulation - which are immature - and I should have stated clearly that I didn't mean them as a certainty truth and fact. I only present these ideas as a source for further thinking and discussing. And I'm open to...

Note dear J Randall Murphy what I'm going to say in this post doesn't serve as a complete reply to your opinions, it will only be a quick reply to say something I think important to clarify my meaning which I didn't express clearly in my previous post. I need to do some preparation for...

What is our "self"? Our "self" is not an object or a set of statuses, but is a moving momentum at the front tip of a running time line, existing in and only in "now". In order to explain what is our "self", I will need to explain several prerequisite concepts. The first concept is the...

Thank you for saying this dear ShaneTheThinker.

I have something to say. I've already said many things in this forum, but I have more to say, important to me. I confess I've done something wrong, even if I have a reason. I don't know how to speak this in English, let me have a try, I think I should be strict to myself and be lenient to the...

I made a mistake in my previous post, I said "modern people are not that easily deceived as like old times - especially compared to the old times before internet and notion of information highway prevail", no, this statement of mine is wrong! There are still many XXXXXX(I don't want to use not...

I share my opinion if you all don't mind. Relevant to the reason why you see the quality of the discussion in this forum degraded over the last several years. A part of the reason is that, there is a conspiracy starting from decades ago, also I feel cold war was involved, but not to much...

While the meaningless chanting with lofty words addiction is only a waste of time, many psychic in many of the past famous (I don't use the word notorious because I said I don't condemn frauds) hoaxes are not only a waste of everyone's time but also shameless deceivings, they deceived people...

Funny enough, some people, or I should say quite many people, feel, or think, the more "lofty words" you speak, the more credibility you sound. To this day, still, some people continue to produce hollow, drab, meaningless nonsense, waste-of-time sentences, repeated with the same stale devoid...

Sorry the previous post of mine is too verbose. I will extract some key points and retell my opinions in a relatively concentrative way. Let me talk about quacks, frauds, cheats, lies. I have an opinion that from now on, strategically, no one can ever be deceived again, neither by any...