Search results

  1. Bertha Huse

    The hard problem: Tom Stoppard on the limits of what science can explain

    You're right. I must have mixed the too together. Although I am certain Tyson quoted him at some point in a tweet. Can't find it. Same difference though. As far as the aggression? Laughable considering the bullshit we've had to put up with Skeptics on this site. If you don't like my style...
  2. Bertha Huse

    The hard problem: Tom Stoppard on the limits of what science can explain

    I am not about to do your homework for you Neil. I am retired. If you don't believe me then that's your problem not mine. No it doesn't. You're right. But on the other hand, some of the best philosophers were also scientists. My Best, Bertha
  3. Bertha Huse

    The hard problem: Tom Stoppard on the limits of what science can explain

    Yeah it's called Google. Try it some time. Many philosophers have also been scientists. Take William James for example. Ever walk around Harvard? One of the buildings there has his name on it. Cheers mate. My Best, Bertha
  4. Bertha Huse

    Presentiment Paper Discussion

    Sadly, a priori bias which without fail leads dogmatic skeptics like you Paul to always assume there must be something wrong with the experimental protocols and analysis is to any intelligent scientist: superficial. It is a tired worn out skeptical argument that has become like the boy who...
  5. Bertha Huse

    The Tyranny of Physicalism: You’re Either a God or a Goofball

    It is sad to see skeptics continue to advocate the physicalist model after decades of scientific research in quantum physics. Modern physicists have established scientifically there is no physical object present unless an observation takes place. There is no reality that exists independent of...
  6. Bertha Huse

    The Tyranny of Physicalism: You’re Either a God or a Goofball

    That's great. Feel free to answer my question. My Best, Bertha
  7. Bertha Huse

    The Tyranny of Physicalism: You’re Either a God or a Goofball

    Really? Please explain. In what fashion is consciousness "exactly like computation is a trick of electrical activity." And please be more specific than: "duhhh ... I see the neurons firing therefore that must be consciousness." My Best, Bertha
  8. Bertha Huse

    Where are all the atheists

    Honesty? What does a Skeptic know about honesty? Arouet spews out his dishonest nonsense, and once he reaches a certain point, refuses to acknowledge valid responses. Same MO of Michael Shermer with Sheldrake. The same Skeptic stink and same odorous lack of intellectual integrity. My Best...
  9. Bertha Huse

    Give Me Your Best Shot

    Over time they really do wear you out. And you begin to realize you're simply engaged with a fruitless argument with fundamentalists who are so dogmatically entrenched in their materialism, nothing will break their faith. You could quote some of the best scientists who walked the planet...
  10. Bertha Huse

    Where are all the atheists

    Yes I think there comes a point where what is being engaged here can be summed up as trolling by remarkably arrogant, unethical Skeptics. They should be relegated to one forum and there should be signs all over the place for new users: HERE BE SKEPTIC TROLLS. Post at your own risk. And...
  11. Bertha Huse

    Where are all the atheists

    Coming from a guy who not once, but twice agreed to have a discussion about a seminal book in parapsychology and both times, made it perfectly clear he would not follow through on his agreement. A guy who has not apparently visited a valid medium and repeatedly on these forums has demonstrated...
  12. Bertha Huse

    How can Alex be so firm in his stance? Objectivity has gone out the window

    Interesting. Where do you divide the line between "macro" object and "micro" object? For me, I have much difficulty in seeing a logical consistency of being able to divide a line between one of the other i.e., they are both made of the same matter no? How do you logically create a demarcation...
  13. Bertha Huse

    How can Alex be so firm in his stance? Objectivity has gone out the window

    Interesting. What do you consider a "real-world object"? Do you think it possible a "real-word object" can exist in a super-position i.e. more than one position at the same time? Do you believe a "real-world object" can have non-local attributes? Do you believe "real-world objects" exist...
  14. Bertha Huse

    How can Alex be so firm in his stance? Objectivity has gone out the window

    That's good Paul. And let me ask you - what do you think the nature of meaning is? Do you think absolutes exist in reality? Or you just going to keep on tearing down ideas and thoughts other people make on these forums, without risking contributing any of your own thoughts and ideas? My...
  15. Bertha Huse

    How can Alex be so firm in his stance? Objectivity has gone out the window

    Have you tried a dictionary? Look up these two words: 1. Meaning 2. Absolute My Best, Bertha
  16. Bertha Huse

    How can Alex be so firm in his stance? Objectivity has gone out the window

    The same 3 year old questioning. I mean, humor us Paul. Pretend you've been on the forums for awhile and you've actually heard some honest responses given to you, rather than pretending you don't know what we're talking about. You know ... show a little respect. Maybe some of us have...
  17. Bertha Huse

    Consciousness an emergent of the brain?

    Yes. John Von Neumann concluded the measuring device could not be any different than the atoms that make it up, and therefore would be subject to the same quantum effects. Although Bohr and other physicists subsequently and conveniently (for all practical purpses) ignored the demarcation line...
Back
Top