LoganChristopher
New
Epstein was murdered. We agree there. I'm guessing you then agree that he was part of a pedo-ring in order to procure girls?
I can understand if you deny he's into any SRA stuff. Fine. Besides weird occult temples and sundials on his island I agree there is no real evidence for that, only speculation.
But what you seem to be saying is that he didn't use his connections at all in order to cover his tracks? Even though the first accusation against him of sexual assault was in the 90's.
That none of his connections of elite level people were into the same pedophilia besides him?
How can you say that for this conversation that is neither here nor there? This strikes to the heart of elite-level connected pedo individuals influencing the world. (Saying they "rule the world" is an example of black and white thinking. You talk a big game about black and white thinking but then keep engaging in it yourself.)
With Baccarat saying that does that make him a "poor" person...or equally a sick person that needs help and is part of the problem?
You're saying that overthrowing other peaceful countries, poisoning and torturing your own people isn't dark stuff? Only little me spouting some facts as well as some theories is dark? That's messed up if you honestly believe that.
Look, I do agree political opportunists do take and run with this stuff. I just finished reading The Smear by Sharyl Attkisson which I thought was quite illuminating on the topic. For instance, I am not convinced that the Clinton's are satanist pedophiles. But we know they're liars involved in many scandals. And judging by the number of convicted pedophiles they are surrounded by, I do think it is suspicious and worth talking about, rather than labeling as a sick and twisted conspiracy theory in order to shut down conversation.
What is with all the insults? I really was hoping for more from this forum than that ignorant behavior.
I can understand if you deny he's into any SRA stuff. Fine. Besides weird occult temples and sundials on his island I agree there is no real evidence for that, only speculation.
But what you seem to be saying is that he didn't use his connections at all in order to cover his tracks? Even though the first accusation against him of sexual assault was in the 90's.
That none of his connections of elite level people were into the same pedophilia besides him?
How can you say that for this conversation that is neither here nor there? This strikes to the heart of elite-level connected pedo individuals influencing the world. (Saying they "rule the world" is an example of black and white thinking. You talk a big game about black and white thinking but then keep engaging in it yourself.)
Although I will say there was some conspiratorial elements in the 9/11 towers coming down
With Baccarat saying that does that make him a "poor" person...or equally a sick person that needs help and is part of the problem?
What alone is dark stuff is an ignoramus with limited ability to reason and with paranoid leanings spreading sinister rumors to scare people and make them feel bad about their society and themselves - and to glorify himself in a weird and dishonest way.
You're saying that overthrowing other peaceful countries, poisoning and torturing your own people isn't dark stuff? Only little me spouting some facts as well as some theories is dark? That's messed up if you honestly believe that.
Look, I do agree political opportunists do take and run with this stuff. I just finished reading The Smear by Sharyl Attkisson which I thought was quite illuminating on the topic. For instance, I am not convinced that the Clinton's are satanist pedophiles. But we know they're liars involved in many scandals. And judging by the number of convicted pedophiles they are surrounded by, I do think it is suspicious and worth talking about, rather than labeling as a sick and twisted conspiracy theory in order to shut down conversation.
What is with all the insults? I really was hoping for more from this forum than that ignorant behavior.
Last edited: