First Last
Member
In case of any ambiguity, I think the global synchronized tyranny is a self-evident historical fact cause we all watched it on TV.
Last edited:
covid loose ends
- Thread starter First Last
- Start date
Alex
Administrator
I think following the money makes foreknowledge pretty much undeniable.
Alex
Administrator
Agreed. self-evident.
and this sometimes puts people on tilt, but denial of the "self-evident" nature it is further evidence of it
![[[p]]]( "Wink [[p]]")
Last edited:
First Last
Member
So then the mundane greed explaination might go something like...
Gates knew what we all came to learn about Biontech - that they were well positioned for rapid mrna vax development and this is something he thought he could turn a profit on some day. Unbeknownst to anyone, the opportunity for Biontech to showcase their advancements would come much sooner than anticipated. Event 201 was just Gates leaning on world leaders to capitalize on the circumstances which resulted in a semi-synchronized over-reaction maximizing fear, vax uptake, and Gates bank account.
Is that about right? It strikes me as kind of naive considering his prominant (and totally inappropriate) role as medical-industrial PR guy, vocal proponent of population reduction, and Epstein pal. Of course the shade I cast on Gates is anecdotal but don't many criminal cases start with a hunch requiring further investigation? Why "white-knight" Gates?
Last edited:
Silence
Member
Maybe its semantics gents, I don't know.
What are we talking about here? A conspiracy to make money or a conspiracy to create "globally synchronized tyranny"? Because I read those as two completely (or damn near completely) different things. If its the latter, can you provide a definition?
Again, I think everything related to COVID can be explained through opportunism and plain old money/greed motivation. You both seem to imply there's more at play here and yet I don't see the evidence for it. That's it really.
What are we talking about here? A conspiracy to make money or a conspiracy to create "globally synchronized tyranny"? Because I read those as two completely (or damn near completely) different things. If its the latter, can you provide a definition?
Again, I think everything related to COVID can be explained through opportunism and plain old money/greed motivation. You both seem to imply there's more at play here and yet I don't see the evidence for it. That's it really.
First Last
Member
Fair, this thread contains at least 3 distinct sub-topics by now and I'm guilty of switching lanes w/o a blinker. I'm just not happy with any explanation I guess but I really have appreciated you and others weighing in with your thoughts.
If nothing else I think I've come away with a hybrid explanation wherein Gates - possessing more money than god, an insatiable appetite for more, a non-functioning empathy center, and weilding godlike influence upon global health authorities - allowed or enabled this hell on earth for profit.
Alex
Administrator
I think the evidence is overwhelmingly on the side of --- planned, orchestrated, enabled.
As you correctly pointed out regarding event 201... one only has to read RFK Juniors book... or read the articles on unlimited Hangout. no reasonable person can look at these documents as anything other than planning for the " worldwide tyranny" they eventually carried out.
... and consider this... how far in advance planned event 201. 6 months? A year?
First Last
Member
I'm hazy on the timeline. As I recall, event 201 took place in the fall of 2019? And covid had likely been around for some months prior to that? Depending on the timing of events, it seems conceivable (probable?) that health authorities were couching their knowledge at this time while coordinating a response. Gates, being the evil incarnate SOB he is, would have naturally been advocating maximum fear/vax profits. But if 201 was scheduled before covid's release I'd have to concede to the advanced planning idea, bringing me full circle to the beginning of this post.
Silence
Member
Come on Alex. The only evidence you need is to read a single book from a singularly biased source? There's no rigor there at all.
Why wouldn't you use your impressive network to reach out to the folks at John Hopkins directly if you really cared to understand event 201? See what you might find out about the actual planning for that event? At least seek to confirm/cross-check what RFK asserts?
But suggesting that RFK's account of things is sufficient evidence reeks of the typical scientific mainstreamers you've railed against for years here. Its the exact same tactic; appeals to biased sources.
Alex
Administrator
I thought the evidence I cited was compelling... but I'm happy to host an interview with a notable Authority willing to take your side. please keep me posted on your progress finding someone... or, as I suspect, your inability to find anyone.