Didn't Scalia want sodomy to remain a crime? As in, sex acts done in the privacy of one's home?
Also he had problems with the idea that we have autonomy over our bodies?
And I don't recall him being too good on the separation of Church & State?
Maybe I'm making a mistake, and happy to be corrected...but seems like he was happy for a kind of global regime, so long as it was under some religious edicts about how we live our lives?
edit:
Looks I wasn't wrong about the Church & State thing?
Yeah, not feeling the idea just some guys think random writings came from God they should be promoted by the government.
Guess if he was defending against a global regime, he was only mad the wrong guys were in charge.
Hardly a guy I'd trust to protect my freedoms.
A man who was quite clearly anti gay, opposed desegregation, opposed the banning of executing minor criminals, opposed women's right to choose by his desire to overturn Roe v. Wade. What a mensch, eh?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/13/opinion/justice-antonin-scalias-supreme-court-legacy.html?_r=0
I wasn't intending to debate the merits of Scalia's decisions or opinions... those could be debated on an individual basis in other discussions. I really just started this thread to mention the suspicious circumstances around his death.
Is it plausible he simply died of natural causes? Sure. He was old.
Is it plausible he simply went to sleep with a pillow over his head and didn't wake up? Sure. I have on rare occasions slept with a pillow over my eyes to block out light and sound.
But good law enforcement does not make decisions and jump to conclusions based solely on what is "plausible".
The death of any judge regardless of circumstances is always treated with a modicum of suspicion... how much more the most powerful judge in the U.S.? How much more a judge standing in the way of globalist agendas?
The unexpected death of any person is initially treated by investigators as a potential homicide and an autopsy is performed by default.
Texas state law as well as good police practice requires that an autopsy be performed. But no autopsy was performed. This is completely outrageous. Cinderella, the JP could not trouble her fat ass to go out and see the body of the most powerful judge in the nation, but declared that he died of natural causes based solely on a phone call from an unnamed source.
The fact that standard law enforcement procedure and state law was not followed is a huge red flag.
Now about the pillow over the head...
Put yourself in Poindexter's position. You're a former special forces operator and millionaire business man who has spent a lifetime dealing personally with killing and conspiracies on the battlefield and in the business world. You're talking about the death of one of the most powerful men in the nation who died while a guest on your property under your watch.......and you mention that you found him with a pillow over his head. Why?
A) You're too stupid to find this suspicious or consider the fact that others might find this suspicious and you're too stupid to choose your words carefully.
B) You know this will arouse suspicion and be gasoline to the fires of conspiracy theories, but you go ahead and throw it out there.
(A) seems highly unlikely. No one gets to be a special forces operator and then millionaire businessman without being smart and understanding how to carefully craft statements and control perceptions.
(B) seems like the only logical choice.
If Poindexter chose his words carefully, then his statement about the pillow only makes sense if it was intended to send a message of intimidation.