It’s not brilliant it’s stupid and flawed and I already explained why.
You also did not explain why the sun always is about the same angular size, any time of year, or any place on its trajectory.
Which also means you did not show that the sun is nearby.
Actually, you did not answer any of the questions that i asked in my previous post:
How does the sun move according to your version of the flat earth?
Is it not so that there are different flavors of flat eartherism?, which one do you adhere to?
That said, you do not even need two sticks to prove the flat earth wrong, one is enough.
Between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn, twice a year, something weird happens:
The sun sets in the east goes over the sky in a straight line above you, at its highest point, a stick stuck vertically in the ground will not have a visual shadow.
On "zero shadow day" the shadow of the stick does not turn with the sun. It gets shorter and shorter until it is invisible at midday with the sun straight over, then it becomes longer and longer in the opposite direction.
This would not be possible in a model of the flat earth where the sun describes circles over the disk.
can you explain, in your own words, where i am wrong?
one proof at a time Wes, were not finished with the sticks, besides that, the link does not work for me.