Garry, you should listen to this interview with philosopher Neil Kramer from December.
He goes into detail how Evil is basically just abiding Lies. And, as you know, Lies cannot and do not stand forever. Truth always prevails...
Of course, with capital-T "Truth" being something that you has willfully chosen, Charlie. What else can it be, after all? ;)
Has to disappoint you, Charlie - there is no singular, universal, absolute "Truth" out there. Belief in the "universal Truth" is the ultimate mistake, forced on us by certain agressively expansionist, power-willing networks of social interaction; What manifests itself behind each claim of "the Absolute Truth" is the certain Selves' covert and frustrated Will to Power, moving toward establishing its forceful Reign over the counteracting Will to Freedom manifested by the Others.
What is "true" and what is "false" is always
conditional - this is, defined with, and identified by, a set of criteria which itself cannot be justified by itself, being literally based on nothing - or, more precisely, on Nothingness, from which Self creates it-Self with its Will. It is this very Self's wilfulness which lies at the bedrock of all criteria - be they of "truth", or "goodness", or "beauty", or whatever else
And, so, each particular Self constructs its own specific set of arbitrarily formulated criteria, which defines and identifies "the Truth" that is voluntaristically created by the Self.
Of course, since there is a countless multitude of Selves in actual existence, and the experientially manifested world is created not by one of them, but by all of them working together (but not perfectly harmonically - and this is the reason our world, despite its apparent stability and structure, occasionally mainfests weird "glitches" which we call "paranormal phenomena"), each of the Selves has to deal not just with its own set of criteria of "trueness", but also with the ones created by Others (this means, other Selves). So, it can modify and reshape its own criteria in accordance with its acceptance or rejection of some Others' criteria, thus making social communication somewhat possible (even if with many difficulties and only to a certain degree).
And even in a social communication it is always a particular Self's willful choice - whether to accept or to reject, partially or fully, the criteria proposed or imposed by some of the Others.