For example take the first preschooler from McMartin that reported being sexually abused. as I documented earlier in this thread, he was three years old at the time. he came home and was bleeding out of his backside. his mom took him to the pediatrician. the pediatrician suspected sexual abuse and referred him to emergency room. from there he was referred to a doctor who specialize in sexual abuse. Debbie Nathan does a lot of arm-waving to distract people away from these facts but she never challenges them... because they are just the medical facts of the case!
I think prosecution should follow the letter of the law, but in terms of me determining for myself what really happened many of the legalities are irrelevant (BTW
* BTW may want to read the above Post in detail about all the additional information they found during an archaeological dig at McMartin years later... victims told them where to dig and what would find... they dug and found it... no legal tricks and shenanigans.
BTW2 she even defends the convicted pedo from the Glendale school (James Toward)