Pam Popper, Fight for Health Rights |526|

Regarding pregnant women vaxxed in the first and secnd trimester - 104 out of 127 women experienced a miscarriage. This means the miscarriage rate of women who received the vaccine in the first or second trimester is actually 81.9%, or 8 out of 10 women – way, way above the national average.

Links to the original study available in this linked article (or in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Study Shows That Up To 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester | Evie Magazine

A simple math error [on purpose or not on purpose I don’t know] on part of team responsible for the Shimabukuro NEJM/CDC paper has been known for months.

Some of us caught it at the time.

It is quite convoluted how Shimabukuro explained it [in which they made math error, which they did not acknowledge; that resulted in erroneous conclusions their NEJM paper was based on].

In simplest terms: Shimbakuro et al. used the wrong denominator, at a key point in calculations; based on their own data, via this math error, they then wrongly assess a much lower, instead of the correct, much higher percents of miscarriages — based on their own data set, from the CDC V-SAFE.

Obviously, this never should have occurred, but it did and NEJM published it; that is where, in the old days, peer review, proof readers and fact checkers would be deployed; and had that happened, there would be no debate that the data in the Shimbakuro paper itself shows exactly the miscarriage rate of at least 81.88976% in either trimester 1 or 2. [Citing “fact checkers” like discredited Reuters –after the fact — to “debunk” corrections to the NEJM failure to fact check in the first place, before hand — prior to publishing — is a fools errand at best.]

Of 827 completed pregnancies, at least 700 were from a third semester covid 19 vax shots. Thus, at most, 127 otherwise, either trimester 1 or 2/ covid shots.

Thus at least 104 spontaneous abortions, divided by at most 127, equals a miscarriage rate of at least 81.88976%

104/127 = 82%

But this is not how the Shimbakuro team calculated, and that is on them, and on the NEJM, and also on the CDC which spread this, as Shimbakuro is their main guy on pregnancy safety and the covid shots. So obviously this is a very big deal. And this gross error needs to be acknowledged and corrected. That is what rational people do. That is the actual scientific method.
A few months ago my vet prescribed my cat Methimazole tablets for her thyroid. He said "Make sure these pills don't come in contact with anyone who's pregnant or breastfeeding". Imagine how much stronger a "vaccine" capable of fighting a virus 2x dangerous than the flu, and they're just giving it to pregnant women with 0 regard.
 
Regarding pregnant women vaxxed in the first and secnd trimester - 104 out of 127 women experienced a miscarriage. This means the miscarriage rate of women who received the vaccine in the first or second trimester is actually 81.9%, or 8 out of 10 women – way, way above the national average.

Links to the original study available in this linked article (or in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Study Shows That Up To 8 In 10 Women Had A Miscarriage After Getting The Covid Vaccine Before The Third Trimester | Evie Magazine

A simple math error [on purpose or not on purpose I don’t know] on part of team responsible for the Shimabukuro NEJM/CDC paper has been known for months.

Some of us caught it at the time.

It is quite convoluted how Shimabukuro explained it [in which they made math error, which they did not acknowledge; that resulted in erroneous conclusions their NEJM paper was based on].

In simplest terms: Shimbakuro et al. used the wrong denominator, at a key point in calculations; based on their own data, via this math error, they then wrongly assess a much lower, instead of the correct, much higher percents of miscarriages — based on their own data set, from the CDC V-SAFE.

Obviously, this never should have occurred, but it did and NEJM published it; that is where, in the old days, peer review, proof readers and fact checkers would be deployed; and had that happened, there would be no debate that the data in the Shimbakuro paper itself shows exactly the miscarriage rate of at least 81.88976% in either trimester 1 or 2. [Citing “fact checkers” like discredited Reuters –after the fact — to “debunk” corrections to the NEJM failure to fact check in the first place, before hand — prior to publishing — is a fools errand at best.]

Of 827 completed pregnancies, at least 700 were from a third semester covid 19 vax shots. Thus, at most, 127 otherwise, either trimester 1 or 2/ covid shots.

Thus at least 104 spontaneous abortions, divided by at most 127, equals a miscarriage rate of at least 81.88976%

104/127 = 82%

But this is not how the Shimbakuro team calculated, and that is on them, and on the NEJM, and also on the CDC which spread this, as Shimbakuro is their main guy on pregnancy safety and the covid shots. So obviously this is a very big deal. And this gross error needs to be acknowledged and corrected. That is what rational people do. That is the actual scientific method.
The calculation in the article is incorrect.

3958 women who were pregnant at the time of their COVID vaccination, or became pregnant shortly after, were registered in the study. 827 out of 3958 (or 21%) had completed their pregnancy when the preliminary results were reported. That is, their pregnancy was over either because they gave birth or they had a miscarriage or other pregnancy loss. However, that means that the remaining 3131 (79%) of the women WERE STILL PREGNANT, as far as they knew. The denominator, to calculate what portion experienced a spontaneous abortion in the first trimester, has to include ALL the women who were also in the first trimester when vaccinated, which was 1224, not just the number of women whose pregnancy happened to be over.

Now to be fair, the calculation the study authors reported was also incorrect, by using "827" as the denominator. And they corrected that in a follow-up report. But it still leaves them with a spontaneous abortion rate of around 10-15%.
 
"However, this study is focusing specifically on how the Covid vaccine impacts pregnancy, including by trimester. So to more precisely calculate the miscarriage rate, we have to remember that miscarriages, by definition, occur before the 20-week gestation mark. This means that all 700 women who received the vaccine in the third trimester must be excluded from the calculation because they were already past being able to have a technical miscarriage. So really, 104 out of 127 women experienced a miscarriage. This means the miscarriage rate of women who received the vaccine in the first or second trimester is actually 81.9%, or 8 out of 10 women – way, way above the national average."
 
"...This study is still ongoing, as 3,131 participants had not completed their pregnancy yet at time of publication, so these preliminary statistics will change. Right now, we're seeing two ends of the spectrum because of the short follow up window. Follow up occurred only two to three months later, which means the researchers had a higher probability of getting results at both ends of the spectrum – women who gave birth and women who miscarried early in their pregnancy. Once more follow ups are done over time, these numbers will change."

"
That being said, the study seems to overlook the miscarriage rate and to focus on the positive rates of third-trimester vaccination, concluding that “Early data...do not indicate any obvious safety signals with respect to pregnancy or neonatal outcomes associated with Covid-19 vaccination in the third trimester of pregnancy.”
Other researchers have analyzed the data from this study and have also calculated similar miscarriage rates. New Zealand researcher Dr. Aleisha Brock and Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, calculated the incidence of miscarriage in women vaccinated before 20 weeks gestation was actually 82-91% in a paper published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law in November 2021. “We question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al. study to support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy, which has now been hastily incorporated into many international guidelines for vaccine use, including in New Zealand,” the researchers said."
 
Criticizing (correctly) the denominator of 827, does not mean that it is okay to then substitute an invalid denominator. The original criticism, in the NEJM, points out that the correct denominator would be "the risk of spontaneous abortion should be determined on the basis of the group of participants who received the vaccination before week 20 and were followed through week 20 or had an earlier pregnancy loss." Using "127" as the denominator, excludes all the women who were followed through week 20 and were still pregnant, and all the women who were still pregnant, but not yet at week 20. The authors clarified that only 319 (104/319 is 33%, but it over counts spontaneous abortions (it only includes those pregnancies at less than 20 weeks that were lost)) out of 1224 women met that criteria at the time of the preliminary report. They subsequently followed up with all 1224 to pregnancy completion and reported on the results. Which gave a rate of about 14%.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2113516?query=recirc_curatedRelated_article
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2113891

Please note that "Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law" was formed to publish anti-vaccine "research". It's not indexed in the NLM as an real scientific journal.
 

Alex

Administrator
That is extremely important. Thank you for the time stamp. If that’s true it can’t be referred to as a theory any longer.
The architects (Peter Daszak, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates) of the Plandemic™, and the specific crimes against humanity they have committed.

ARCHITECTS OF THE PLANDEMIC
David says that Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, Anthony Fauci were the architects of the pandemic, and Bill Gates and of the plan to profit on the forced-vaxxination of everybody on the planet, which goes back to at least 2016 in a document titled “Developing Medical Countermeasures (MCMs) for Coronavirus”, which is part of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences”.
Daszak wrote to Fauci, “We need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasure, such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond when they see profit at the end of the process.”
David says the above statement is “An admission of 5 felonies in the United States…and not a single governor, not a single Department of Justice member, not a single US attorney, not a single attorney general, not a single elected official in this country will actually allow this quote to go into the public record.
“So guess what? It’s on you to do it. This is the quote you need to send to every elected representative, every single appointed representative, every school board. This is an admission of a felony criminal conspiracy to kill and maim Americans…[That document] is when the criminal conspiracy was made public.
A HARD TRUTH
“And this is one that’s going to be awkward for many of you to embrace, but I don’t care, because sometimes, we have to embrace a hard truth: On September 18, 2019…the World Health Organization, in their Global Preparedness Monitoring Board gathering, got together and said that we need to create a global simulation of the release of a respiratory pathogen, which was going to go from September of 2019 to September of 2020. A global campaign.
“The day after that document was published, President Donald Trump signed this Executive Order [13887] and I want you to read what’s in this Executive Order. These vaccine platform technologies include DNA, mRNA, virus-like S-particles, vector-based and self-assembling nanoparticle vaccines.
“The day after the Chinese, the NIAID, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, in criminal conspiracy, in interlocking directorates, in racketeering, declared…war on the world, Donald Trump signed an executive order actually mandating that the toxin be released on the public. Right there it is, in his Executive Order.
“Now, listen to what I have to say: Did he premeditate that Executive Order? No. But we must be careful, People, because it doesn’t matter which one among us stands in positions of authority. We must embrace the reality that if we are not accountable for every word that we say, every action we take, we open up ourselves to compromise and if we are going to win the campaign for the hearts and minds and livelihood and soul of this country, we must commit ourselves to absolute integrity. No exceptions. Zero exceptions.
 
Last edited:

Alex

Administrator
The architects (Peter Daszak, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates) of the Plandemic™, and the specific crimes against humanity they have committed.

ARCHITECTS OF THE PLANDEMIC
David says that Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, Anthony Fauci were the architects of the pandemic, and Bill Gates and of the plan to profit on the forced-vaxxination of everybody on the planet, which goes back to at least 2016 in a document titled “Developing Medical Countermeasures (MCMs) for Coronavirus”, which is part of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences”.
Daszak wrote to Fauci, “We need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasure, such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond when they see profit at the end of the process.”
David says the above statement is “An admission of 5 felonies in the United States…and not a single governor, not a single Department of Justice member, not a single US attorney, not a single attorney general, not a single elected official in this country will actually allow this quote to go into the public record.
“So guess what? It’s on you to do it. This is the quote you need to send to every elected representative, every single appointed representative, every school board. This is an admission of a felony criminal conspiracy to kill and maim Americans…[That document] is when the criminal conspiracy was made public.
A HARD TRUTH
“And this is one that’s going to be awkward for many of you to embrace, but I don’t care, because sometimes, we have to embrace a hard truth: On September 18, 2019…the World Health Organization, in their Global Preparedness Monitoring Board gathering, got together and said that we need to create a global simulation of the release of a respiratory pathogen, which was going to go from September of 2019 to September of 2020. A global campaign.
“The day after that document was published, President Donald Trump signed this Executive Order [13887] and I want you to read what’s in this Executive Order. These vaccine platform technologies include DNA, mRNA, virus-like S-particles, vector-based and self-assembling nanoparticle vaccines.
“The day after the Chinese, the NIAID, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, in criminal conspiracy, in interlocking directorates, in racketeering, declared…war on the world, Donald Trump signed an executive order actually mandating that the toxin be released on the public. Right there it is, in his Executive Order.
“Now, listen to what I have to say: Did he premeditate that Executive Order? No. But we must be careful, People, because it doesn’t matter which one among us stands in positions of authority. We must embrace the reality that if we are not accountable for every word that we say, every action we take, we open up ourselves to compromise and if we are going to win the campaign for the hearts and minds and livelihood and soul of this country, we must commit ourselves to absolute integrity. No exceptions. Zero exceptions.
and for the Trumpsters... here's his exec order:
Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health
A Presidential Document by the Executive Office of the President on 09/24/2019


PUBLISHED DOCUMENT
Executive Order 13887 of September 19, 2019
Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Findings. (a) Influenza viruses are constantly changing as they circulate globally in humans and animals. Relatively minor changes in these viruses cause annual seasonal influenza outbreaks, which result in millions of illnesses, hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations, and tens of thousands of deaths each year in the United States. Periodically, new influenza A viruses emerge from animals, including birds and pigs, that can spread efficiently and have sustained transmission among humans. This situation is called an influenza pandemic (pandemic). Unlike seasonal influenza, a pandemic has the potential to spread rapidly around the globe, infect higher numbers of people, and cause high rates of illness and death in populations that lack prior immunity. While it is not possible to predict when or how frequently a pandemic may occur, there have been 4 pandemics in the last 100 years. The most devastating pandemic occurred in 1918-1919 and is estimated to have killed more than 50 million people worldwide, including 675,000 Americans.


(b) Vaccination is the most effective defense against influenza. Despite recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that nearly every American should receive the influenza vaccine annually, however, seasonal influenza vaccination levels in the United States have currently reached only about 45 percent of CDC goals.
 

Alex

Administrator
Alex,
At one point in this episode you did what I think every righteous platform everywhere should be doing right now. You asked Pam to play devils advocate for the totalitarian globalists. This resulted in a short answer which to me is a face palm moment.
If you listen in on any war game discussion you will always hear the fiercest progress made in this zone. In my opinion, this is where we should have our feet planted.
!!!Let’s assume that the totalitarian globalists believe they are acting righteously on behalf of their ideology. Then we have an actual starting point
agreed. I'm surprised more people don't want to hear this angle... I always do. and I kick myself when I sometimes don't go there in interviews.
 
The architects (Peter Daszak, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates) of the Plandemic™, and the specific crimes against humanity they have committed.

ARCHITECTS OF THE PLANDEMIC
David says that Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, Anthony Fauci were the architects of the pandemic, and Bill Gates and of the plan to profit on the forced-vaxxination of everybody on the planet, which goes back to at least 2016 in a document titled “Developing Medical Countermeasures (MCMs) for Coronavirus”, which is part of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences”.
Daszak wrote to Fauci, “We need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasure, such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond when they see profit at the end of the process.”
I'm leaning toward this kind of conspiracy being what has happened, with lots of terrified or pressured useful idiots then organically playing their roles. As you know, I think most of the conspiracy theories put forth on Skeptiko are garbage. So my leanings in this case are unusual.

That said, be careful with the idea that they did it for profit (i.e.cold hard cash). I think there is a lot more to it than base money making.

Gates has many written statements and recorded speeches wherein he states that over-population is the biggest problem humanity faces. Hy does Gates see it as a problem? Well, it ties into global warming. More people means more carbon emissions involved in agriculture (to feed us all) and then more carbon through increasing industrialization. Also, it ties into concepts of equity (global socialism). With a smaller population, redistribution and development of resources so that everyone in the world has what they need becomes more feasible. Gates say this. It isn't me mind reading.

Gates has stated repeatedly that he sees vaccines as the path to population reduction.

Now, in fairness, Gates has never stated that he wants to kill people off with vaccines or viruses. Rather, he falls back on what seems to me to be a goofy idea. According to Gates, the science says that as the health of a population increases, the birth rate decreases. Gate's science tells him that people have lots of children (more than 2 or 3) because, in those societies, children succumb to fatal diseases at a high rate. So have 8 children because expect only 2 to live.

If we can vaccinated the people of the world against all manner of killer viruses, then we can save the planet via lower population and less greenhouse gasses - higher survival rate of vaccinated children = lower birth rate. That is what Gates publishes for public consumption. Just look it up.

It occurs to me that if people are having 8 children because they only expect 2 to live, that there should not be over-population because the "excess" children have died.If they don't die and Gate's science is true, then people would adjust and have 2 children. Seems pretty basic to me.

I digress.....

Gates has more money than he can possibly spend. There is no point to making more. But the ideology of the paradigm shift of "going green", being the savior of the planet, the architect of the elimination of human suffering is playing hugely in Gate's mind. He can transcend death by leaving his mark on the human race for all of the glorious history that will occur going forward. Massive ego boost and a god/savior complex; a common theme among those so wealthy that they spend their later years giving away money in the service of others. This is where those who don't understand or believe in spirit end up when they have lots of money and time on their hands and rely on science to do good in the world. Very common.

Fauci? Same as Gates to a lesser degree.He's more crass and seeking immediate personal glory to compensate for his small stature and a life lived in the shadows. He has unappreciated genius syndrome on top of Napoleon complex/rat faced/small dick/can't get laid issues.

I do think that whatever positive value their ideology and implementation plan may have had (being generous here.I think it had 0 value, probably negative) has been hijacked by the vultures who are pure profiteers, financially, politically, etc. That was inevitable. A world savior needs disciples to implement such massive lofty plan. Every group of disciples has a Judas or two or three.

The naïveté of Gates is remarkable - if naïveté it is. Ego sometimes Trumps common sense and wisdom gained via experience. There is always the possibility that he just wanted to kill people or sterilize them with his disease and vaccines. I see no solid evidence for that at this time, but am keeping an open mind as events develop. It could be something the hijackers injected (pardon the pun) into the works, but, again, no solid evidence, only some effects -and the effects are not huge, unless low live birth rates turn out to be a big thing across the globe post vax. What we see by way of effects today could just be people being flawed and screwing up. CTs rely too much on the planners being perfect, omniscient, no Murphy's law in effect, etc.
 
Last edited:
and for the Trumpsters... here's his exec order:
CTs rely too much on the planners being perfect, omniscient, no Murphy's law in effect, etc.
Yesterday I had an epiphany while talking to a friend about God. He implied that he doesn't assume God must be all-knowing omni-present, etc..
I responded with my simulation/programmer explanation, but then i had a light-bulb burst moment which was: Who's to say that our realm has to be anything more than 2 lines of perfect code?.. Meaning. All of the infinite greatness and complexity of the universe need not imply infiinte lines of code.

So, the reason I bring this up, is to analogize it to the fascination/passion of the CT enthusiast. My argument being that Just because the CT enthusiast is reporting vast complexity, doesn't mean it's a vastly complex conspiracy. Perhaps its the EFFECTS only which are vastly complex?

To connect the God-complexity to the subject CT,
In the same way that Capitalism is simply conducive to monopolization, so is any oligarch utilizing simple conducive means.
Example: What we're seeing is mostly likely NOT that Big Pharma's #1 goal is to become more powerful than the US military. That would just happen to occur as a result if they're running on a line of program code that reads something like "Reach and incorporate all humans"
 
Last edited:
Yesterday I had an epiphany while talking to a friend about God. He implied that he doesn't assume God must be all-knowing omni-present, etc..
I responded with my simulation/programmer explanation, but then i had a light-bulb burst moment which was: Who's to say that our realm has to be anything more than 2 lines of perfect code?.. Meaning. All of the infinite greatness and complexity of the universe need not imply infiinte lines of code.

So, the reason I bring this up, is to analogize it to the fascination/passion of the CT enthusiast. My argument being that Just because the CT enthusiast is reporting vast complexity, doesn't mean it's a vastly complex conspiracy. Perhaps its the EFFECTS only which are vastly complex?

To connect the God-complexity to the subject CT,
In the same way that Capitalism is simply conducive to monopolization, so is any oligarch utilizing simple conducive means.
Example: What we're seeing is mostly likely NOT that Big Pharma's #1 goal is to become more powerful than the US military. That would just happen to occur as a result if they're running on a line of program code that reads something like "Reach and incorporate all humans"
I agree with your idea in this case. They put the idea of a killer virus out there - "they" just being a few colluding actors. The fear factor and vulture/opportunist factor did the rest (i.e. "the effects").

Something similar happened with the conspiracy to invade Iraq on WMD BS.

The tulip bulb mania and other mass delusions and crowd madness are also similar.

That said, I do not agree with the simulation hypothesis or any of that, nor that 9/11, Kennedy, The Finders, etc, etc are conspiracies like this; or even conspiracies at all.
 
I agree with your idea in this case. They put the idea of a killer virus out there - "they" just being a few colluding actors. The fear factor and vulture/opportunist factor did the rest (i.e. "the effects").

Something similar happened with the conspiracy to invade Iraq on WMD BS.

The tulip bulb mania and other mass delusions and crowd madness are also similar.

That said, I do not agree with the simulation hypothesis or any of that, nor that 9/11, Kennedy, The Finders, etc, etc are conspiracies like this; or even conspiracies at all.
Here's another cheap analogy.

Let's say your town has 2 main competitive plumbing companies which are very similar. And all the homeowners go with whichever is less expensive when need arises... So..

Shady Plumbing Co. overhears a random handy man mention a plan to mess with the local water tower and spike out the water pressure and cause some leaks in the neighborhood. But, instead of reporting this to the authorities and warning the neighborhood, Shady Plumbing Co. creates and distributes a flyer that says "Dear homeowner, old water pipes have been failing due to pressure fluctuation, and our company specializes in testing your water pipes to ensure durability, and we're the best as repair or replacement so do your due diligence and set an appointment to have your pipes tested and maintenanced ASAP!!!"
Then one day the water tower surges pressure, and 10% of all the homes in the neighborhood spring leaks.
Thrifty Plumbing Co tells all his customers that he's looking into what's probably an issue with the City water tower so we don't need to re-pipe at this time, but just repair the failed section.
Shady Plumbing Co. tells all his customers that full re-pipe is needed immediately at all affected homes, and says that the reason Thrifty Plumbing Co. isn't offering the service is because they're not equipped for it, and furthermore claims lying about the water tower, since they don't specialize in testing and treatment of the old piping systems.

In this instance, Shady Plumber did not conspire. But instead, they used criminal acts in progress to their benefit. and it could be argued that they enabled them too - by knowingly distracting from the source of the problem and distracting from the real solution.
 
Last edited:
Here's another cheap analogy.

Let's say your town has 2 main competitive plumbing companies which are very similar. And all the homeowners go with whichever is less expensive when need arises... So..

Shady Plumbing Co. overhears a random handy man mention a plan to mess with the local water tower and spike out the water pressure and cause some leaks in the neighborhood. But, instead of reporting this to the authorities and warning the neighborhood, Shady Plumbing Co. creates and distributes a flyer that says "Dear homeowner, old water pipes have been failing due to pressure fluctuation, and our company specializes in testing your water pipes to ensure durability, and we're the best as repair or replacement so do your due diligence and set an appointment to have your pipes tested and maintenanced ASAP!!!"
Then one day the water tower surges pressure, and 10% of all the homes in the neighborhood spring leaks.
Thrifty Plumbing Co tells all his customers that he's looking into what's probably an issue with the City water tower so we don't need to re-pipe at this time, but just repair the failed section.
Shady Plumbing Co. tells all his customers that full re-pipe is needed immediately at all affected homes, and says that the reason Thrifty Plumbing Co. isn't offering the service is because they're not equipped for it, and furthermore claims lying about the water tower, since they don't specialize in testing and treatment of the old piping systems.

In this instance, Shady Plumber did not conspire. But instead, they used criminal acts in progress to their benefit. and it could be argued that they enabled them too - by knowingly distracting from the source of the problem and distracting from the real solution.
Why did the handy man decide to mess with the local water tower? How did Shady plumbing learn about his nefarious plans?

But yes, more or less, that's what I've been saying all along about these alleged conspiracies that Skeptiko thinks are the product of insider cabals.

Oswald, a crazy asshole (like your hypothetical handy man) shot Kenedy for his own crazy reasons. Lots of people benefitted from that. Their benefitting doesn't mean they were in on the assassination.

Same with covid. IMO, Fauci and Gates and some others conspired to do gain of function research to develop this, that, and the miracle vaccines that Gates thinks are going to save the world by preventing child deaths leading to lowering population and, thus, lowering carbon emissions. The virus got out of the lab. Maybe deliberately by some hijacking party - the equivalent of your handy man - or maybe by accident because shit does happen.

Once it's out all the Shady plumbing equivalents seize upon the opportunities that a virus on the loose represents.

I've said a dozen times here that vultures eat road kill. It doesn't mean they colluded/conspired with the drivers of automobiles to hit the animals.
 
Work presented at the 2021 American Heart Association online conference.

https://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/9349/session/573

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
 
Last edited:
EllisR raises a good point though, for many people wearing masks is relatively trivial and benign. I have rarely worn it in the car, but at the same time doing so can help you not forgot to wear it into the next shop you visit and so, meh, whatever, I have sometimes chosen just to keep it on because it's easier.
Masks can easily do more harm than good. They soon get wet - perhaps more so if someone is coming down with something - and people touch the damn things all the time because they are uncomfortable, thus spreading any bugs onto handrails, doorknobs, etc. They might be more believable if people were regularly warned not to fiddle with their masks.
But following on from the masks, which is the pretty innocuous hill that Alex has chosen to die on (love you Alex but geez it's kind of obvious masks don't have to be perfect outside a lab setting to have some prophylactic value over an entire population
Or some harmful 'value', as explained above.

I think the primary purpose of the masks was to scare people.

David
 
Top