Pam Popper, Fight for Health Rights |526|

https://www.softschools.com/examples/fallacies/appeal_to_authority_examples/430/#:~:text=Appeal to authority is a,"authority" on the subject.

Gene Roddenberry was the creator of Star Trek.
He also had a bunch of terrible ideas afterwards.
To properly judge the validity of claims, it's good to have experts involved.
It's bad to say it's true because someone is an expert.
J
Now come on Jack. The episode is 3 hours long. You haven't given this expert a fair go...
Jack hasn't listened to it.
Dr. Malone explicitly proclaimed throughout the interview that his intention is to provide information and enable the people to decide for them selves. He's not establishing any positions. Just laying out facts.

Jack, the various world governments, WHO and NIH all in lock step is not because they're reading from a rule book. If you gave even 20 minutes of listen to the 100's of hours of documentation from the Event 201, & https://www.youtube.com/user/biosecuritycntr/videos , it's more than clear that the pandemic response they engineered is not gauged at steering countries to operate independently to find best solutions. In fact it's quite clear the overreaching intention to consolidate authority.
They're like the Mariposans of Star Trek TNG, they chose to control rather than enable those whom they need to work with.
S-2 E-18 "Up the Long Ladder"
"The Mariposans ask the Enterprise crew for samples of their DNA to create new clones. Riker refuses, as he values his uniqueness, and Picard advises that the rest of the crew is likely to feel the same, so the Mariposans kidnap Riker and Pulaski to steal their DNA. Upon discovering this, the away team beams directly to the colony's cloning labs, where they are repulsed to find copies of themselves being grown, which Riker destroys. Granger is furious and appeals to Picard, but Pulaski argues that a new batch of clones will only delay the inevitable. Instead, she advises that they consider partnering with the Bringloidi to create a viable gene pool. Initially, each colony's leader treats the other society with disdain, but they eventually agree to merge their colonies and disparate cultures."
Wake up, Brother.
 

Attachments

  • borg.jpg
    borg.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:
To paraphrase Pam; pitch them up and they'll miss eventually; thin edge of the wedge etc

Ongoing discussion here: https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/forums/topic/pjh-law-crime-number-issued/page/3/

Update 31/12/21.

Crime reference number. 6029679/21


For Misconduct in public office and Gross negligent manslaughter made at Hammersmith police station on Monday the 20th of December 2021.


1, evidence is being sent by Philip Hyland PJH Law, Lois Bayliss Broad Yorkshire Law, Dr Sam White and myself to and collated by The Metropolitan police at Hammersmith CID.


2, the demand to stop the V program remains a priority and The police are reminded of this daily.


3, PJH Law with the help of a senior QC are preparing an injunction to apply to the high court to stop the V program.


4, a number of world renowned experts many of whom are known, doctors, lawyers, virologists, immunologists, scientists, professors, data and intelligence experts have added their names and offered assistance to The Metropolitan Police to support this criminal investigation.


5, all Chief Constables in England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales have been contacted and made aware of the criminal complaint and the crime number allocation.

They have also been made aware of the ICC application and their subsequent acknowledgment.


6, the office of The Mayor of London and Police Crime Commissioner Sadiq Khan has been notified of the criminal investigation and the ICC application.

He has been asked and for him to instruct (as is his lawful duty), The Metropolitan Police to make a public announcement to stop the V program immediately. They have a duty to protect the public from death, harm, injury and loss.


7, the Superintendent to Cressida Dick is aware and has acknowledged the criminal complaint. Also the credible witnesses making contact with him have been acknowledged and their details and evidence forwarded to Hammersmith CID by the Superintendent.


8, some members of Parliament have been made aware of the criminal complaint and the ICC application.


9, from today’s live interview with Reiner Feullmich, Dr Sam White was joined by Advocate of the Indian Barr Association lawyer Dipali Ojha. She confirmed a petition was filed in the High court in Bombay on the 25/11/21 against the V manufactures.

They have also instructed the CBI in India (central bureau of investigation) to investigate the murders by the V of a number of victims.
They cite Bill Gates and other executive officers of the V companies who have collaborated together as being responsible. Applications for compensation in the hundreds of millions of dollars have been made.


10, there are a number of people including retired and serving lawyers and retired police now working flat out, to obtain statements from those damaged by the V or who have lost loved ones believed from the V.



11, due to the sheer volume of victims out there and those coming forward it is impossible to make contact with them all. We are now recommending all victims of the V make contact with their local police force.



Due to the evidence being submitted to The Metropolitan police we believe each individual has a right to be classed as a victim of crime.


The injuries attributed to the V must be documented by the police and an appropriate crime number issued.


It could be anything from actual bodily harm through to Grievous bodily harm , manslaughter and ultimately murder.


We now know those in government, the NHS and the MHRA knew about the dangers of the V, were made aware (and proof of this is provided to The Met) and did nothing to stop it. In fact they continue to promote it as the only safe remedy when it is not.



ALL U.K. CHIEF CONSTABLES HAVE BEEN CONTACTED, THEREFORE THIS INFORMATION SHOULD HAVE BEEN FILTERED DOWN TO ALL CONSTABLES AND CIVILIAN STAFF TO BE MADE AWARE AND TO DEAL APPROPRIATELY.



12, if any police force refuse to treat you as a victim of crime or provide a crime number remind them of the national crime recording standards as detailed below.


If you believe you are a victim of crime and there is no evidence to the contrary a crime must be recorded.


13, if they continue to refuse ask them to take a victim statement of complaint including a victim personal statement and request it is forwarded, on your behalf, to The Metropolitan Police, Hammersmith CID quoting the CRIME NUMBER;


6029679/21

This is the actual crime number allocated to this investigation.



14, CARE WORKERS, DOCTORS AND NURSES.



if you have already been sacked or forced to leave your job because you refused to take the V you have been blackmailed.


This is a criminal offence. (See below).


Nobody has a right to demand you take any kind of intrusive medication, V or gene therapy and then sack you or threaten you with losing your livelihood.


Again we are advising you to go to your local police station and make a criminal complaint as a victim of blackmail against the person who dismissed you. Saying it’s a government mandate is no excuse and this is unlawful. The individual is responsible for their actions in making unlawful demands causing you loss, not an organisation or government body.



Again, cite the crime recording standards. If that fails request that a victim statement is taken including a victim personal statement and ask for it to be forwarded to, The CID department at Hammersmith police station using crime reference number;


6029679/21.

15, it is not possible (due to the sheer volume) to respond to personal messages and requests.


We are working flat out with a large number of people to obtain as much evidence and information as possible in order to assist the Metropolitan Police with this massive criminal investigation.



Please remain positive and supportive, we know the nature of the beast and dismissive or negative comments don’t help. There is huge interest in this criminal complaint from many countries around the world and we are encouraging them to do the same.


Rest assured the work to stop this and bringing those responsible to justice will continue unabated.


We need everyone to pull together and work together, if you get knocked back be persistent and insistent and remember the police work for us.



We are also asking for now, avoid sending links, videos and documents because we have thousands of these already and they are very time consuming to go through.


As soon as there are any other notable updates or developments we will let you know.


Please share this post far and wide.



Thank you.


Happy new year.





...
 
A former CBC employee tells us what our tax dollars are actually paying for.

https://tarahenley.substack.com/p/speaking-freely?r=9dpfg&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

To work at the CBC in the current climate is to embrace cognitive dissonance and to abandon journalistic integrity.

It is to sign on, enthusiastically, to a radical political agenda that originated on Ivy League campuses in the United States and spread through American social media platforms that monetize outrage and stoke societal divisions. It is to pretend that the “woke” worldview is near universal — even if it is far from popular with those you know, and speak to, and interview, and read.

To work at the CBC now is to accept the idea that race is the most significant thing about a person, and that some races are more relevant to the public conversation than others. It is, in my newsroom, to fill out racial profile forms for every guest you book; to actively book more people of some races and less of others.

It is to allow sweeping societal changes like lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and school closures to roll out — with little debate. To see billionaires amass extraordinary wealth and bureaucrats amass enormous power — with little scrutiny. And to watch the most vulnerable among us die of drug overdoses — with little comment.

It is to consent to the idea that a growing list of subjects are off the table, that dialogue itself can be harmful. That the big issues of our time are all already settled.

It is to capitulate to certainty, to shut down critical thinking, to stamp out curiosity. To keep one’s mouth shut, to not ask questions, to not rock the boat.

This, while the world burns.
 
The pandemic is over in La Crete, Alberta.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/pandemic-over-la-crete-lab-140000450.html

More than 1,200 people in the hamlet of La Crete, 700 kilometres northwest of Edmonton, paid $100 each in mid-December to have their blood tested for antibodies by Ichor Blood Services, a private lab specimen collection company based in Calgary.

The tests found antibodies in most of the 991 unvaccinated individuals who were tested.

Ichor CEO Mike Kuzimickas said he believes the results show La Crete is relatively safe from COVID-19.

"The pandemic is over in La Crete; they have reached herd immunity," Kuzimickas told CBC News in an email last month.
 
Ronald McDonald house evicts family of Leukemia patient. Now this is evil.

A father and mother of a 4 year old battling leukemia are both unvaccinated? I guess that's their choice, but that seems a tragic case of misparenting on the surface.

Second, a non-profit healthcare facility caring for extremely vulnerable children has the audacity to insist on vaccinations are you're up in arms about it?

Third, there are stories on line regarding this situation where the officials have demonstrated their work toward finding alternative housing for those unwilling to get vaccinated at no financial detriment to the families.

Look, the whole mandate thing feels overdone, even to me. But to be calling a healthcare facility evil for insisting people who voluntarily enter their facility be vaccinated is patently ridiculous. Up your game.
 
[
Second, a non-profit healthcare facility caring for extremely vulnerable children has the audacity to insist on vaccinations are you're up in arms about it?

What happened to the Science?
Double jabbed people are catching Covid and passing it on to those they live with, warn experts who have studied UK household cases.
Individuals who have had two vaccine doses can be just as infectious as those who have not been jabbed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59077036

I wouldn’t normally choose the BBC as a source nowadays, but I guess they’re the type of media that you might respect.

A father and mother of a 4 year old battling leukemia are both unvaccinated? I guess that's their choice, but that seems a tragic case of misparenting on the surface.

To me, this shows that you are a ‘true believer’ in vaccines.
You “guess” it’s their choice.
“tragic case”
”misparenting”

<div data-xf-p="1">Look, the whole mandate thing feels overdone, even to me. But to be calling a healthcare facility evil for insisting people who voluntarily enter their facility be vaccinated is patently ridiculous. Up your game.</div><div data-xf-p="1"><br></div><div data-xf-p="1"></div>
<div data-xf-p="1"></div>

If you were really as balanced as you assume you are, you’d see that what K9 was suggesting was far from being “patently ridiculous” and as no-one had rebutted your propaganda supporting post, I felt that for posterity’s sake someone should do so.

The “up your game.” comment is sickeningly arrogant.
K9‘s level of thinking on this is way above your own imo.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: K9!
You're blind Steve. You've blinded yourself on this thing to be well beyond any ability to question the orthodoxy.

Yes, vaccines do not 100% protect against transmission. Yes, there are risks to vaccines. That said...

If you had a severely immunocompromised 5 year old with leukemia, I would question any parent's judgement who didn't "get the jab" as you like to so pejoratively put it. I bet even half or more of your anti-mainstream priests, err authorities, would agree with this.

You're off the rails here. Pick better battles and K9 should up her game; comment stands.
 
I bet even half or more of your anti-mainstream priests, err authorities, would agree with this.

I very much doubt it. What’s the actual POINT if Covid is just as much transmitted by the jabbed as by the unjabbed?

You’re the one that‘s blind. If you don’t believe the BBC or my ‘conspiracy theorist pals’, who do you believe? Yourself?
 
  • Like
Reactions: K9!
I very much doubt it. What’s the actual POINT if Covid is just as much transmitted by the jabbed as by the unjabbed?
Hardly a proven point Steve. You present this as fact when in fact its only your conclusion.

You make my entire point here. A parent with a child such as in this case with even a "shred" of doubt regarding any incremental benefit regarding contraction/transmission would get the jab. Its such an obvious point.
 
Hardly a proven point Steve. You present this as fact when in fact its only your conclusion.

You make my entire point here. A parent with a child such as in this case with even a "shred" of doubt regarding any incremental benefit regarding contraction/transmission would get the jab. Its such an obvious point.
Can you provide a current total of children under 12 who have died with Covid?
I ask, because we don't hear many MRNA-Vax-the-kids-supporters including the obvious risks over time. Meaning sure maybe there's only (guessing) .0001% of the kids will die from myocarditis shortly after receiving the jab, but what REALLY matters is the compound effects of jabbing kids year after year with an infusion strong enough cause Miocarditis in some, must eventually cause it in many more if we're honestly speculating over time. This is stupidly-basic logic which isn't being addressed/included by the pro-jabbers. Not a peep about the potential compound effects.
 
Can you provide a current total of children under 12 who have died with Covid?
I ask, because we don't hear many MRNA-Vax-the-kids-supporters including the obvious risks over time. Meaning sure maybe there's only (guessing) .0001% of the kids will die from myocarditis shortly after receiving the jab, but what REALLY matters is the compound effects of jabbing kids year after year with an infusion strong enough cause Miocarditis in some, must eventually cause it in many more if we're honestly speculating over time. This is stupidly-basic logic which isn't being addressed/included by the pro-jabbers. Not a peep about the potential compound effects.
I don't have a view and I'm not sure how it relates to my issue with K9's inane outrage at this story.

I would assume anyone who's a parent of a 5 year old with a life threatening cancer would want to maximally mitigate their risk of COVID infection. This would, for me, mean an absolute certainty of "getting the jab" even if I wasn't fully convinced of a) its efficacy and b) its impact on my own health. I'd throw myself in front of a train for my kids (as would any parent).

That was one issue I had with this story.
 
I don't have a view and I'm not sure how it relates to my issue with K9's inane outrage at this story.

I would assume anyone who's a parent of a 5 year old with a life threatening cancer would want to maximally mitigate their risk of COVID infection. This would, for me, mean an absolute certainty of "getting the jab" even if I wasn't fully convinced of a) its efficacy and b) its impact on my own health. I'd throw myself in front of a train for my kids (as would any parent).

That was one issue I had with this story.
OR, you become a walking spike protein factory, and endanger them further.
Since it's all concocted in Frankenstein's lab anyway.
;) ;)
 
I'd throw myself in front of a train for my kids (as would any parent).

That was one issue I had with this story.

What if in 2019 Fauci said due to a climate change catastrophe in Wuhan China the Sun is now putting out poisonous rays and all children now must wear a 2 millimeter thick layer of a newly-invented-technologically-advanced semi-toxic sunscreen anytime they go outside and this is now the New Normal..... Then you find out that Fauci is directly tied to to the invention of this semi-toxic sunscreen. And you also learn that it's invention has been in the works for years prior to the climate event, with the previously established overall goal to deem obsolete all other sunscreens. Then on top of that, you find out that the both the US government and the US military had previously rejected proposals to manufacture it within the United States....

Some might rightfully suspect that the sunscreen is the train you think you're jumping in front of.
 
What if in 2019 Fauci said due to a climate change catastrophe in Wuhan China the Sun is now putting out poisonous rays and all children now must wear a 2 millimeter thick layer of a newly-invented-technologically-advanced semi-toxic sunscreen anytime they go outside and this is now the New Normal..... Then you find out that Fauci is directly tied to to the invention of this semi-toxic sunscreen. And you also learn that it's invention has been in the works for years prior to the climate event, with the previously established overall goal to deem obsolete all other sunscreens. Then on top of that, you find out that the both the US government and the US military had previously rejected proposals to manufacture it within the United States....

Some might rightfully suspect that the sunscreen is the train you think you're jumping in front of.
Well.
Jumping in front of a train would just get you ALL killed.
Maybe there's a better way. Derail it.
Funny, I saw the expanded political flyer of "hate has no home here", which lays out all the flashpoint issues we've been played on, and the first one was "science is real".
What the fuck does that even mean? It's hilarious! Defending abstractions!
 
Back
Top