That's good. It means there should be room for us to illuminate some new things for one or other or both of us.
I take a fairly standard view that metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of being, beings, time, space, and causality. What about you?
- In what way would you say our metaphysics differs?
- Are we even using the word "metaphysics" in the same way?
Metaphysics — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
I appreciate the sentiment, and the same in return.
I define metaphysics as it was originally defined - "beyond the physical." My statement was based on my provisional assumption you have some sort of materialist and/or scientist/physicalist world view. I hope I am wrong but that's where I make my bet based on what I've read.
If I had to put a label on my world view I would say, pansychist/spectralist. I describe the reality I am experiencing as a quantum computational information processing system which is programmable by some of the very denizens that are experiencing it. I see conflict as a fundamental. Competing world views is a prime conflict (thus I am open to evolving my views).
I fight (meant metaphorically) on the side of the life force. My primary spirituality currently emulates the teachings of the Gathas of Zarathustra.