DasMurmeltier
New
Nope. I didn't eat chocolate.
But you should have done so. I also did. It wasnt valentines chocolate though since im a hermit that is living on a mountain somewhere in europe.
Nope. I didn't eat chocolate.
Wait wait wait, so theoretically, you're saying as we make Earth better, we're turning Heaven into a trash heap, so Heaven can't be real? Perhaps the law of opposites only applies in the physical realm. From what I've read, this may be why people incarnate here in the first place, to experience getting to choose between suffering and pleasure.
Nope. I didn't eat chocolate.
But you should have done so. I also did. It wasnt valentines chocolate though since im a hermit that is living on a mountain somewhere in europe.
You can run, but you can't hide, Super Sexy. I'm on to YOU. MWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/stephen-frys-furious-rant-god-5072065
This particular interview seems to be getting a bit of media attention
He is an intellectual cocaine junkie, Who cares what he say's.
Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that he suffers from bipolar disorder and depression, so full marks for that ignorant statement.
He is an intellectual cocaine junkie, Who cares what he say's.
Johnny's working his way through the Skeptiko forum's greatest hits.I'm shutting down this thread. No more comments are allowed. This comment will be the final one.
My sincerest apologies.
Johnny's working his way through the Skeptiko forum's greatest hits.
Great, so it's ok for people who want to portray themselves as intellectual role models to be cocaine addicts because they suffer from depression and bi polar disorder.
Got it.
Anyway, I'm sorry Stephen Fry seems to have offended you with his views, I guess criticism of religion must somehow be verboten for you.
He would certainly have something to say about that apostrophe... ;)
Yes, it is ok for people to portray themselves as intellectuals to be concaine addicts. Because their use of drugs shouldn't undermine their views on something. Furthermore, there is some evidence to suggest that intelligent people are more likely to take drugs. http://www.nhs.uk/news/2011/11November/Pages/intelligent-children-illegal-drug-use.aspx.
Anyway, I'm sorry Stephen Fry seems to have offended you with his views, I guess criticism of religion must somehow be verboten for you.
Care to post any links on the dangers of misuse of cocaine?
Stephen Frys criticism of the Biblical God is not authentic, in one breath claiming God does not exist and in the other holding him accountable for all the evil in the world.
If God does not exist according to the intellectual supremo Mr Fry, then God can not be accountable.
But if God does exist, then even the intellectual brilliance of cocaine abuser Stephen Fry would have to admit his reasoning and understanding would be inferior to an all powerful God.
I agree that his reasoning is naive. To me it tends to suggest that he hasn't bothered to look into the subject, but has chosen to close the door in advance, and then use his arguments to justify not looking. Though he's not alone in this approach, I suppose there's an element of 'safety in numbers' in this view.I don't like Fry, either. His reasoning is naïve