How can you say it's the exact opposite?
Here's what I actually wrote:
'the globalists seem to think they can get their desired order out of chaos. But out of chaos are plenty of opportunities for idealists opposed to globalism to make headway, and also for purely selfish players to cut out their own territories.
This can become a self-fulfilling spiral, as when the players run their cost-benefit calculations for carving out their own territories, the more chaos there is, the more potential for gains by the players to break ranks with the globalists and stake out their own claims, free from globalists' control.'