Robbedigital
New
Another brilliant retort, and I have to apologize and restate my main point/accusation that your tendency is to argue on behalf of the established Power. .To be clear, I actually think that your analogy would be one where I would generally agree that the celebrity lady was guilty given what we know. However, I disagree that it is a good analogy for the typical CT.
I disagree that I argue in favor of established power. I've been going on about how covid is mostly a scam perpetrated by established power. I've said right here how established power illegally invaded Iraq based on lies that they spread throughout society in the build-up to war.
How can you say that I am default in league with established power?
I call them as I see them. I have no allegiance to any side in all of this. Sometimes that means I'm generally aligned with the official findings and sometimes I'm not. Why do you have to be all black and white all of the time?
And what's with the racism comment? 13%/50% is a fact straight from FBI crime statistics. I mentioned it because it is well known and often cited among law enforcement types. Now it's a thought crime to cite facts? That just about makes you the established power (woke variety).
I inferred nothing from your use of the adjective "poor"other than I assumed it to be merely proof that you waver toward a focus on inconsequential trivialities (which could explain the tendency toward CTs).
Everyone wants to be the established power. CTists seek the same. They want to be the go to version of truth. They need to take down those who already have power to get there. So they defame them and call them liars, etc.; which is accurate to some extent, but they themselves lie to do the take down. Same snot, same nose, different nostril.
Don't you see? It's all a power struggle; who's story is going to be believed. It's all BS. I won't play. If you seek power over others, you are evil. I don't care what "side" you're on. Stand on your own two feet and stand alone if you must. That's what a real man does. A woman should seek a place by a real man's side. Join a herd and put your life in pain; doesn't matter if it's an establishment herd or a rebel herd. A real man seeks to help others be free when he must interact with them.
Btw, Leadership is not power over others, it is setting an example that helps others realize their own personal strength and freedom.
I think your method of reasoning, intentionally or not, applies the skeptical lens more rigorously against those who are getting fucked over by whatever the event may be....
9/11 for instance..
The idea that (to you) somehow the CTist comes out as the bigger asshole... as opposed to the rest of the world who gave up on the inquiry and accepted the "new normal".... Regardless how far from the mark their given theory is, my point would be that it cant possibly hold a candle to how Far the "new normal" is from where society should be holding regard to the event and it's aftermath.
So I'm triggered that you seem to see the CTist as more of an asshole than the people who are applauding the "new normal". Otherwise I would assume you would lend the CTist a lot more benefit of the doubt.