Seriously?
Use of such terms is what kills any possible discussion.
How about actually referring to what people actually believe:
A1 People who believe in Climate Change from industrial CO2.
A2 People who don't believe in Climate Change from industrial CO2.
A3 People who don't really care, but see backing one side or the other as being to their advantage.
B1 People who believe in a world with no borders.
B2 People who believe borders are essential.
B3 People who don't care except in as much as it gives them a soapbox.
B4 People who believe in a world with no borders, but who live in gated communities.
C1 People who believe Russia is so awful, we need to aim for war with Russia
C2 People who extract money from the military process, and want confrontation with Russia to continue, but don't want it to go all the way.
C3 People who want peace.
D1 People who believe there is an enormous amount yet to be done to free LBGT people.
D2 People who think we are in danger of antagonising the majority if we are not careful.
D3 People who would go back to the Victorian era in this regard.
E1 People who think Muslims are a highly persecuted minority and should be protected in any way possible.
E2 People who think Muslims need to be integrated into mainstream society a lot more, and backward concepts should be challenged hard, using the law if necessary.
E3 People who would expel al Muslims from the West
F1 People who think world trade is wonderful.
F2 People who think world trade needs tight control to prevent it being exploitative.
F3 People who would rather world trade was minimised, and each country made its own goods and food as far as possible.
My politics would be A2/B2/C3/D2/E2/F3
I don't see any other way to discuss these issues sensibly. There are plenty of letters of the alphabet left, if people want to expand the scheme. Decimal numbers might also be OK - e.g. A1.5 might refer to someone who thought Climate Change from CO2 might be real, but insufficiently large to matter that much.
David