forgot to put link in beforeTip of the iceberg if you ask me. I think Zuckerberg (satanic ritual abuse cult imo) is all over this election fraud.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...audit-zuckerbucks-shady-dominion-acquisition/
forgot to put link in beforeTip of the iceberg if you ask me. I think Zuckerberg (satanic ritual abuse cult imo) is all over this election fraud.
He isn't legally "president" because he lost the election. He is an usurper, better described as the current occupant of the White House.Do you really think that is all that is wrong with President Biden, or are you putting it on?
David
From what I've seen of these Trump lie lists, they are 100% baloney. They describe hyperbole, innocent errors, and inaccurate (by some measures) estimates as "lies", even though a lie isn't simply untrue or questionable, but believed false and presented as true by the person in question. Other items aren't even false. Having said all that, my experience in these conversations is that the progressive side of the argument either doesn't believe their own words (hence, they are lying) or they are so obdurately attached to their version of reality that no quantity or quality of information is sufficient to penetrate it. If I was a fact checker for FB, provided I could stoop to such a thing, which I doubt, these many claims about Trump would all vanish overnight.Silence provided you with a good chunk of lies to start with,
I'd be curious what elections you mean and whether they were clean.Sure about that Jim?
The last three mayor elections in the US show otherwise.
Disclaimer: 2020 was the first and probably the last time I’ll vote, and I voted Trump. Would probably take it back if I could, on principle.
I hope I live to see the retirement of Capitalism Liberalism and Communism.
I hate to admit but I think the Dems are currently closest to the winning future, (yet so embarrassingly far).
I think the winning future will be built on something like: The commoditization of a societies ability to lift it’s weakest/poorest into self-sustaining stability and on, toward prosperity.
Current failures:
Capitalism - Favors the poor sometimes, mostly/highest when they're lucky enough to have, at default, the gumption necessary to secure said favor.
Liberal Democracy - Favors the poor for so long as they promise to stay poor and participate in the ‘poor plan’.
Both seem to have a death grip on the need for there to be “a poor”
Edit: Commoditization doesn’t need imply capitalism. i.e: it’s common knowledge that there’s a special quality to keeping secret an act of service performed.
This is something that Democrats/liberals/RINOs/Marxists don't seem to realize. What has been done to our country over the last year is so horrible that conservatives are well beyond annoyed. One image that comes to mind when I think of this subject is a photo taken in France shortly after the end of WWII. In it, a French woman who dated a German soldier has all her hair cut off while sitting in a chair in the middle of a street, surrounded by townspeople. Other collaborators fared much worse.it wont be forgotten.
I'm afraid you're lost in a sea of conspiratorial nonsense Andrew.race riots/election fraud/lockdowns/and fake vaccinations
I'm afraid you're lost in a sea of conspiratorial nonsense Andrew.
There are some kernels in what you wrote. The extreme left is, by definition, extreme and warrants diligent oversight to challenge and check its deranged agenda. Most survey data seems to show a large majority of Americans are opposed to the extreme left's agenda. While we can't casually dismiss it there is enough political force to defeat it. It might be a bit messy but politics always seem to be just that: messy.
However, hanging on to the empty claims of election fraud and calling the COVID vaccines "fake" is just rubbish. Its propaganda much like what you'd expect from the same historical political movements you warn us all against.
You've fallen into a pit of extreme bias and its clouded your rationality.
I'm not denying Andrew's warning of the extreme left. There is some very dangerous stuff being promulgated in that extreme group. For example, teaching elementary school kids that they are guilty of crimes committed by their same skin colored ancestors is lunacy.
Yeah, I do think it is. I tend to believe, as I've stated, that its more of a fringe thing than the fear-mongerers on the right would indicated, but we're seeing things like this pop up in the educational system. Some of the corporate CRT stuff feels equally unbalanced.I agree that would be lunacy. But is that actually a thing?
Yeah, I do think it is.
The point still stands: If a 3 year old comes to his/her parents and indicates they identify as a gender other than their biological indicator it would be ridiculous for the parents to immediately implement a gender reassignment.
Its this type of stuff that we see as fringe lunacy (i.e., let's change all parenting practices to what Charlize Theron has adopted) that is still fringe today, but should be watched in case it starts to gain ANY sort of mainstream adoption. Likewise, helping parents to navigate children who are legitimately gay/transgender does make sense (at least to me; a parent). There's nuance as there is with most things.
Neither the extreme right nor extreme left recognize any form of nuance. A hallmark of bad ideas, bad thinking, and generally pretty bad people.
Hi mate,This is something that Democrats/liberals/RINOs/Marxists don't seem to realize. What has been done to our country over the last year is so horrible that conservatives are well beyond annoyed. One image that comes to mind when I think of this subject is a photo taken in France shortly after the end of WWII. In it, a French woman who dated a German soldier has all her hair cut off while sitting in a chair in the middle of a street, surrounded by townspeople. Other collaborators fared much worse.
Another thing is that the level of anger, resentment, and distrust is so great that we are beyond the point where this fact is communicated to the other side. When this situation is corrected, as eventually it must be, there will be a lot of people who regret how casually they treated the theft of Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms from the American public. They'll wonder, "What did I do?" They'll be told, "My son/daughter/wife/husband lost their job/lost their business/was imprisoned and tortured/died of a "vaccine" jab/committed suicide/died in Kabul/lost their life savings/etc because of your ill-considered support for/active involvement in race riots/election fraud/lockdowns/and fake vaccinations. Now suffer the consequences".
I suspect that the way I look at Democrats/Liberals today is no different than the way victim populations looked at Nazi collaborators in Germany or Japanese collaborators in China. Maybe they are stupid or ill-informed but that is no excuse for actions that caused such widespread damage. Pray it doesn't get any worse. What they have already done is bad enough. From what I have seen, it looks like there are hundreds of politicians and dozens of wealthy people in business who have committed treason, and thousands of lower level thugs who participated. Legally, they could all be given the standard penalty for treason and they would deserve it. Maybe there will be a less messy punishment invented before then but whatever the punishment is, they must be punished and the punishment must suit the crime.
EDIT: After watching the anarchy of the past year, I have also decided that I no longer want to give ground on any encroachments for the sake of "tolerance". Practically speaking, this means I try to shop at Christian establishments whenever possible. For instance, Hobby Lobby instead of Michael's. No solution is ever perfect, but for now, I see no reason to pay my oppressors to oppress me more.
Baloney. He didn't say anything about Charlize's situation. He was speaking in generalities about his views on parenting, as a parent, in a hypothetical situation with a 3 year old. It wasn't intolerant or insensitive at all. If you watch the source interview you'll see he goes out of his way to say he's not going to judge or evaluate another parent's approach to parenting.Well, yes. But nobody suggested such a thing. The insensitive and intolerant thing he did (and what you did just now to an even stronger degree) was immediately characterize whatever it was Charlize did, as dangerous, without knowing anything else about it.
What nuance? All we have to go on are the quotes attributed to her in an interview with the Daily Mail:Well, yeah. That's the problem right there. Why aren't you giving her the benefit of nuance?
Sure. Offer up some evidence to confirm this question. I'm assuming you don't feel there's an extreme left that is problematic and only an extreme right for which we should have concern. I'm game: prove it.Could this simply be an attribution bias on your part?